Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Use of self-administered instruments to assess psychiatric disorders in older people: validity of the General Health Questionnaire, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the self-completion version of the revised Clinical Interview Schedule

  • J. Head (a1), S. A. Stansfeld (a2), K. P. Ebmeier (a3), J. R. Geddes (a3), C. L. Allan (a3), G. Lewis (a4) and M. Kivimäki (a1)...

Abstract

Background

Diagnosis of depressive disorder using interviewer-administered instruments is expensive and frequently impractical in large epidemiological surveys. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of three self-completion measures of depressive disorder and other psychiatric disorders in older people against an interviewer-administered instrument.

Method

A random sample stratified by sex, age and social position was selected from the Whitehall II study participants. This sample was supplemented by inclusion of depressed Whitehall II participants. Depressive disorder and other mental disorders were assessed by the interviewer-administered structured revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) in 277 participants aged 58–80 years. Participants also completed a computerized self-completion version of the CIS-R in addition to the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

Results

The mean total score was similar for the interviewer-administered (4.43) and self-completion (4.35) versions of the CIS-R [95% confidence interval (CI) for difference −0.31 to 0.16]. Differences were not related to sex, age, social position or presence of chronic physical illness. Sensitivity/specificity of self-completion CIS-R was 74%/98% for any mental disorder and 75%/98% for depressive episode. The corresponding figures were 86%/87% and 78%/83% for GHQ and 77%/89% and 89%/86% for CES-D.

Conclusions

The self-completion computerized version of the CIS-R is feasible and has good validity as a measure of any mental disorder and depression in people aged ⩾ 60 years. GHQ and CES-D also have good criterion validity as measures of any mental disorder and depressive disorder respectively.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Use of self-administered instruments to assess psychiatric disorders in older people: validity of the General Health Questionnaire, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the self-completion version of the revised Clinical Interview Schedule
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Use of self-administered instruments to assess psychiatric disorders in older people: validity of the General Health Questionnaire, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the self-completion version of the revised Clinical Interview Schedule
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Use of self-administered instruments to assess psychiatric disorders in older people: validity of the General Health Questionnaire, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the self-completion version of the revised Clinical Interview Schedule
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence . The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Ms. J. Head, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. (Email: j.head@ucl.ac.uk)

References

Hide All
Boyd, RC, Le, HN, Somberg, R (2005). Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression. Archives of Women's Mental Health 8, 141153.
Brugha, TS, Bebbington, PE, Jenkins, R (1999). A difference that matters: comparisons of structured and semi-structured psychiatric diagnostic interviews in the general population. Psychological Medicine 29, 10131020.
Brugha, TS, Meltzer, H, Jenkins, R, Bebbington, PE, Taub, NA (2005). Comparison of the CIS-R and CIDI lay diagnostic interviews for anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine 35, 10891091.
Dozeman, E, van Schaik, DJ, van Marwijk, HW, Stek, ML, van der Horst, HE, Beekman, AT (2011). The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is an adequate screening instrument for depressive and anxiety disorders in a very old population living in residential homes. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26, 239246.
Goldberg, DP (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Goldberg, DP, Hillier, VF (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine 9, 139145.
Goldberg, DP, Williams, P (1988). A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson: Windsor.
Haro, JM, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez, S, Brugha, TS, de Girolamo, G, Guyer, ME, Jin, R, Lepine, JP, Mazzi, F, Reneses, B, Vilagut, G, Sampson, NA, Kessler, RC (2006). Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatic Research 15, 167180.
Jordanova, V, Wickramesinghe, C, Gerada, C, Prince, M (2004). Validation of two survey diagnostic interviews among primary care attendees: a comparison of CIS-R and CIDI with SCAN ICD-10 diagnostic categories. Psychological Medicine 34, 10131024.
Klinkman, MS, Coyne, JC, Gallo, S, Schwenk, TL (1997). Can case-finding instruments be used to improve physician detection of depression in primary care? Archives of Family Medicine 6, 567573.
Lewis, G (1994). Assessing psychiatric disorder with a human interviewer or a computer. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 48, 207210.
Lewis, G, Pelosi, AJ, Araya, R, Dunn, G (1992). Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers. Psychological Medicine 22, 465486.
Lewis, G, Pelosi, AJ, Glover, E, Wilkinson, G, Stansfeld, SA, Williams, P, Shepherd, M (1988). The development of a computerised assessment for minor psychiatric disorder. Psychological Medicine 18, 737745.
Marmot, MG, Davey Smith, G, Stansfeld, SA, Patel, C, North, F, Head, J, White, I, Brunner, EJ, Feeney, A (1991). Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 337, 13871393.
Metz, CE (1978). Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 8, 283298.
Patton, GC, Coffey, C, Posterino, M, Carlin, JB, Wolfe, R, Bowes, G (1999). A computerised screening instrument for adolescent depression: population-based validation and application to a two-phase case-control study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 34, 166172.
Peters, L, Clark, D, Carroll, F (1998). Are computerized interviews equivalent to human interviewers? CIDI-Auto versus CIDI in anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine 28, 893901.
Pez, O, Gilbert, F, Bitfoi, A, Carta, MG, Jordanova, V, Garcia-Mahia, C, Mateos-Alvarez, R, Prince, M, Tudorache, B, Blatier, C, Kovess-Masfety, V (2010). Validity across translations of short survey psychiatric diagnostic instruments: CIDI-SF and CIS-R versus SCID-I/NP in four European countries. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 45, 11491159.
Radloff, LS (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1, 385401.
Stahl, D, Sum, CF, Lum, SS, Liow, PH, Chan, YH, Verma, S, Chua, HC, Chong, SA (2008). Screening for depressive symptoms: validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a multiethnic group of patients with diabetes in Singapore. Diabetes Care 31, 11181119.
Stansfeld, S, Head, J, Bartley, M, Fonagy, P (2008). Social position, early deprivation and the development of attachment. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 43, 516526.
Stansfeld, SA, Head, J, Marmot, MG (1998). Explaining social class differences in depression and well-being. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 33, 19.
Stansfeld, SA, Marmot, MG (1992). Social class and minor psychiatric disorder in British civil servants: a validated screening survey using the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine 22, 739749.
Thomas, JL, Jones, GN, Scarinci, IC, Mehan, DJ, Brantley, PJ (2001). The utility of the CES-D as a depression screening measure among low-income women attending primary care clinics. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 31, 2540.
Williams, JW Jr., Noel, PH, Cordes, JA, Ramirez, G, Pignone, M (2002). Is this patient clinically depressed? Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 11601170.
Wittchen, HU (1994). Reliability and validity studies of the WHO – Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research 28, 5784.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed