Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T00:34:11.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Correction for Replicated Error in Correlation Coefficients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

W. L. Bashaw  and
Harry E. Anderson Jr.
W. L. Bashaw
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Harry E. Anderson Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A solution is presented to the problem of determining a proper correction for spuriousness in correlation coefficients. The general case developed is the estimate of correlation between u and v, both being linear functions of the same set of variables. Special formulae relate to overlapping scales correlations, part-whole correlations, and item-total test correlations.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 1967 , pp. 435 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The research and development reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, under the provisions of the Cooperative Research Program. This research was conducted by the Evaluation Division of the Research and Development Center in Educational Stimulation. The authors wish to thank E. E. Cureton for his helpful suggestions.

References

Anderson, H. E. Jr. A factorial study of the female form of the SVIB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 270–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, H. E. Jr. and Bashaw, W. L. Further comments on the internal structure of the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 211–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, H. E. Jr., Davis, H. C. Jr., and Wolking, W. D. A factorial study of the MMPI for students in health and rehabilitation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1966, 26, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cureton, E. E. Corrected item-test correlations. Psychometrika, 1966, 31, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, J. C. Factor analysis in the study of personality, California: Stanford University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. C. Technical aspects of multi-trait tests. A reply to Dr. Lorge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935, 26, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, T. L. and Krey, A. C. Tests and measurements in the social sciences, Vol. IV ofReport of the commission on the social studies, New York: Scribners, 1934.Google Scholar
Kuder, G. F. and Richardson, M. W. The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shure, G. H. and Rogers, M. S. Note of caution on the factor analysis of the MMPI. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 14–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, G. S. and Dahlstrom, W. G. Basic readings on the MMPI in psychology and medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1956.Google Scholar