Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-v444p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-17T12:17:26.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fitting a Response Model for n Dichotomously Scored Items

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

R. Darrell Bock  and
Marcus Lieberman
R. Darrell Bock
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Marcus Lieberman
Affiliation:
Institute for Educational Research, Downers Grove, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method of estimating the parameters of the normal ogive model for dichotomously scored item-responses by maximum likelihood is demonstrated. Although the procedure requires numerical integration in order to evaluate the likelihood equations, a computer implemented Newton-Raphson solution is shown to be straightforward in other respects. Empirical tests of the procedure show that the resulting estimates are very similar to those based on a conventional analysis of item “difficulties” and first factor loadings obtained from the matrix of tetrachoric correlation coefficients. Problems of testing the fit of the model, and of obtaining invariant parameters are discussed.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , June 1970 , pp. 179 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Research reported in this paper was supported by NSF Grant 1025 to the University of Chicago.

References

Birnbaum, A. Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. Part 5 of Lord & Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D. & Jones, L. V. The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice, 1968, San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Davidoff, M. D., & Goheen, H. W. A table for the rapid determination of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 1963, 18, 114–121.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers, 1st ed., Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1925.Google Scholar
Froemel, E. A Fortran IV subroutine for computing the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Education Statistical Laboratory Research Memo No. 13. The University of Chicago, 1970.Google Scholar
Hastings, C. Jr. Approximations for digital computers, 1955, Princeton, N. J.: University Press.10.1515/9781400875597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrysson, S. The relation between factor loadings and biserial correlation in item analysis. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 419–424.10.1007/BF02289648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indow, T., & Samejima, F. On the results obtained by the absolute scaling model and the Lord model in the field of intelligence, 1966, Yokahama: Psychological Laboratory, Hiyoshi Campus, Keio University.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. UMLFA: A computer program for unrestricted maximum likelihood factor analysis. Educational Testing Service Research Memo RM-66-20, Princeton, N. J., 1967.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. I, 2nd ed., London: Griffin, 1963.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics, Vol. II, 1961, London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, D. & Bock, R. D. A Fortran IV program for maximum likelihood item analysis and test scoring: Normal ogive model. Education Statistical Laboratory Research Memo No. 12. The University of Chicago, 1970.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N. On problems connected with item selection and test construction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1943, 61, 273–287.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N. The factorial analysis of multiple item tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1944, 62-A, 74–82.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. An application of confidence intervals and of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee's ability. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 57–75.10.1007/BF02289028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monograph, No. 7, 1952.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. An analysis of the verbal scholastic aptitude test using Birnbaum's three-parameter logistic model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1968, 28, 989–1020.10.1177/001316446802800401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. Statistical theories of mental test scores, 1968, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference and its applications, 1966, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. Estimating latent ability using a pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement No. 17. William Byrd Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Stroud, A. H., & Secrest, Don Gaussian Quadrature Formulas, 1966, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. A method for scaling ability test items in difficulty taking item unreliability into account (Abstract). American Psychologist, 1948, 3, 309–310.Google Scholar