Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-lqwgf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T13:38:00.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Analysis of Categorizing Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Glen T. Evans
Glen T. Evans*
Affiliation:
The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Latent partition analysis enables an examination of the modal population categorizations of a set of items. The initial model proposed by Wiley is reformulated, extended and generalized. Firstly, the effects of judges are regarded as random, rather than fixed. In a second model, several latent partitions, rather than one, are allowed, resulting in a type of multidimensional approach. Finally, both the single and multiple partition models are shown to be specializations of a less restrictive model, called the category focusing model. In each of these three cases, properties implicit in the model are used to derive appropriate solution procedures.

Measures of individual differences are considered, and the application of the procedure to experimental work in concept formation is discussed. Several sets of data are used to demonstrate the characteristics of the techniques evolved.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , September 1970 , pp. 367 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This project was commenced while the author was on the staff of the University of Queensland.

References

Bartlett, M. S. A note on the multiplying factor for various x 2 approximations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 1954, B16, 296–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. H., & Trabasso, T. R. Concept Identification. In Atkinson, R. C. (Eds.), Studies in Mathematical Psychology, 1964, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericksen, S. C. Studies in the abstraction process. Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76, 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern Factor Analysis, 1967, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, C. W., & Kaiser, H. F. Oblique factor analytic solutions by orthogonal transformations. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joreskog, K. G. Statistical Estimation in Factor Analysis, 1963, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960, 20, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F., & Caffrey, J.. Alpha Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawley, D. N. The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section A, 1940, 60, 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, G. & Pearlstone, Zena. Free and constrained concept learning and subsequent recall. Journal of Verbal Learning, 1966, 5, 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, D. E. Latent partition analysis. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed