Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:34:00.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovery of Structure in Incomplete Data by Alscal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Robert C. MacCallum
Robert C. MacCallum*
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Robert C. MacCallum, Department of Psychology, 404C West 17th Avenue, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A Monte Carlo study was carried out in order to investigate the ability of ALSCAL to recover true structure inherent in simulated proximity measures when portions of the data are missing. All sets of simulated proximity measures were based on 30 stimuli and three dimensions, and selection of missing elements was done randomly. Properties of the simulated data varied according to (a) the number of individuals, (b) the level of random error, (c) the proportion of missing data, and (d) whether the same entries or different entries were deleted for each individual. Results showed that very accurate recovery of true distances, stimulus coordinates, and weight vectors could be achieved with as much as 60% missing data as long as sample size was sufficiently large and the level of random error was low.

Keywords

multidimensional scalingindividual differences modelsmissing data

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 69 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Reference Notes

Bloxom, B. Individual differences in multidimensional scaling, 1968, Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J.IDIOSCAL (Individual Differences in Orientation SCALing): A generalization of INDSCAL allowing IDIOsyncratic reference systems as well as an analytic approximation to INDSCAL. Paper presented at meetings of the Psychometric Society, Princeton, N.J., March 1972.Google Scholar
Harshman, R. A. PARAFAC2: Mathematical and technical notes, 1972, California: U. C. L. A..Google Scholar

References

Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 283–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, R. A., & Cliff, N. A Monte Carlo evaluation of interactive multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1976, 41, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, C. B. Multidimensional scaling: Combining observations when individuals have different perceptual structures. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, P. D., & Poor, D. D. S. On the determination of appropriate dimensionality in data with error. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., & Cornelius, E. T. III A Monte Carlo investigation of recovery of structure by ALSCAL. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 401–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, C. R. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A Monte Carlo study of the basic parameters. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 323–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, I., & Domoney, D. W. Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., & deLeeuw, J. Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 7–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R., & Messick, S. An individual differences model for multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 333–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. W. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: Recovery of metric information. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar