Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T00:41:13.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Test “Reliability”: Its Meaning and Determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Lee J. Cronbach
Lee J. Cronbach*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of test reliability is examined in terms of general, group, and specific factors among the items, and the stability of scores in these factors from trial to trial. Four essentially different definitions of reliability are distinguished, which may be called the hypothetical self-correlation, the coefficient of equivalence, the coefficient of stability, and the coefficient of stability and equivalence. The possibility of estimating each of these coefficients is discussed. The coefficients are not interchangeable and have different values in corrections for attentuation, standard errors of measurement, and other practical applications.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1947 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © 1947 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cronbach, L. J. A case study of the split-half reliability coefficient. J. educ. Psychol., in press.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. On estimates of test reliability. J. educ. Psychol., 1943, 34, 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 255–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holzinger, K. J. and Harman, H. Factorial analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. W. B. and Ferguson, G. A. Studies on the reliability of tests, Toronto: Department of Educational Research, 1941.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. G. Validity for what?. J. consulting psychol., 1946, 10, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, T. L. The reliability coefficient. Psychometrika, 1942, 7, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuder, G. F. and Richardson, M. W. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. F. A first course in statistics, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1942.Google Scholar
London, I. D. Some consequences for history and psychology of Langmuir's concept of convergence and divergence of phenomena. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 170–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remmers, H. H. andWhisler, L. Test reliability as a function of method of computation. J. educ. Psychol., 1938, 29, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar