Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:39:17.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Sebastián Gurovich*
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University, Weston Creek ACT 2611, Australia Australia Telescope National Facility, Marsfield NSW 2122, Australia
Stacy S. McGaugh
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2421, USA
Ken C. Freeman*
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University, Weston Creek ACT 2611, Australia
Helmut Jerjen
Affiliation:
Mount Stromlo Observatory, Australian National University, Weston Creek ACT 2611, Australia
Lister Staveley-Smith
Affiliation:
Australia Telescope National Facility, Marsfield NSW 2122, Australia
W. J. G. De Blok
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3YB, UK
*
ECorresponding author. Email: sebaguro@mso.anu.edu.au; kcf@mso.anu.edu.au
ECorresponding author. Email: sebaguro@mso.anu.edu.au; kcf@mso.anu.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We validate the baryonic Tully–Fisher (TF) relation by exploring the Tully–Fisher (TF) and BTF properties of optically and Hi-selected disk galaxies. The data includes galaxies from Sakai et al. (2000) calibrator sample, McGaugh et al. (2000: M2000) I-band sample, and 18 newly acquired Hi-selected field dwarf galaxies observed with the ANU 2.3-m telescope and the ATNF Parkes telescope (Gurovich 2005a).

As in M2000, we re-cast the TF and BTF relations as relationships between baryon mass and W20. First we report some numerical errors in M2000. Then, we calculate weighted bi-variate linear fits to the data, and finally we compare the fits of the intrinsically fainter dwarfs with the brighter galaxies of Sakai et al. (2000). With regards to the local calibrator disk galaxies of Sakai et al. (2000), our results suggest that the BTF relation is indeed tighter than the TF relation and that the slopes of the BTF relations are statistically flatter than the equivalent TF relations. Further, for the fainter galaxies which include the I-band M2000 and Hi-selected galaxies of Gurovich's sample, we calculate a break from a simple power law model because of what appears to be real cosmic scatter. Not withstanding this point, the BTF models are marginally better models than the equivalent TF ones with slightly smaller Χred2 values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2004

References

Bevington, P. R. 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (Columbus: McGraw-Hill), 56 Google Scholar
Eder, J. A., & Schombert, J. M. 2000, ApJS 131, 47 Google Scholar
Freeman, K. C. 1999, in The Low Surface Brightness Universe, IAU Col. 171, ASP Conf. Ser. 170, 3 Google Scholar
Gurovich, S. 2005a, Thesis, in prep. Google Scholar
Gurovich, S., et al. 2005b, ApJ, in prep.Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., et al. 2003, A&A, 398, 479 Google Scholar
Kormendy, J., & Freeman, K. C. 2004, IAUS, 220, 377 Google Scholar
Martin, M. C. 1998, A&AS, 131, 77 Google Scholar
McGaugh, S. S., Schombert, J. M., Bothun, G. D., & de Blok, W. J. G. 2000, ApJ, 533, L99 Google Scholar
Pfenniger, D., & Revaz, Y. 2004 (astro-ph/0409621)Google Scholar
Pildis, R. A., et al. 1997, ApJ, 481, 157 Google Scholar
Press, W. H., et al. 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran77 (CUP: Cambridge), 660 Google Scholar
Pilyugin, L. S., et al. 2004, A&A, 425, 849 Google Scholar
Sakai, S., et al. 2000, ApJ, 529, 698 Google Scholar
Schombert, J. M., et al. 1997, ApJS, 111, 233 Google Scholar
Tonry, J. L., et al. 2000, ApJS, 530, 625 Google Scholar