Skip to main content

Detector Sampling of Optical/IR Spectra: How Many Pixels per FWHM?

  • J. Gordon Robertson (a1) (a2)

Most optical and IR spectra are now acquired using detectors with finite-width pixels in a square array. Each pixel records the received intensity integrated over its own area, and pixels are separated by the array pitch. This paper examines the effects of such pixellation, using computed simulations to illustrate the effects which most concern the astronomer end-user. It is shown that coarse sampling increases the random noise errors in wavelength by typically 10–20 % at 2 pixels per Full Width at Half Maximum, but with wide variation depending on the functional form of the instrumental Line Spread Function (i.e. the instrumental response to a monochromatic input) and on the pixel phase. If line widths are determined, they are even more strongly affected at low sampling frequencies. However, the noise in fitted peak amplitudes is minimally affected by pixellation, with increases less than about 5%. Pixellation has a substantial but complex effect on the ability to see a relative minimum between two closely spaced peaks (or relative maximum between two absorption lines). The consistent scale of resolving power presented by Robertson to overcome the inadequacy of the Full Width at Half Maximum as a resolution measure is here extended to cover pixellated spectra. The systematic bias errors in wavelength introduced by pixellation, independent of signal/noise ratio, are examined. While they may be negligible for smooth well-sampled symmetric Line Spread Functions, they are very sensitive to asymmetry and high spatial frequency sub-structure. The Modulation Transfer Function for sampled data is shown to give a useful indication of the extent of improperly sampled signal in an Line Spread Function. The common maxim that 2 pixels per Full Width at Half Maximum is the Nyquist limit is incorrect and most Line Spread Functions will exhibit some aliasing at this sample frequency. While 2 pixels per Full Width at Half Maximum is nevertheless often an acceptable minimum for moderate signal/noise work, it is preferable to carry out simulations for any actual or proposed Line Spread Function to find the effects of various sampling frequencies. Where spectrograph end-users have a choice of sampling frequencies, through on-chip binning and/or spectrograph configurations, it is desirable that the instrument user manual should include an examination of the effects of the various choices.

Corresponding author
3 Email:
Hide All
Anderson, J., & King, I. R. 2000, PASP, 112, 1360
Antilogus, P., Astier, P., Doherty, P., Guyonnet, A., and Regnaulta, N. 2014, JInst, 9, C03048
Barron, N., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 466
Bernstein, G. 2002, PASP, 114, 98
Bickerton, S. J., & Lupton, R. H. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1275
Boreman, G. D. 2001, Modulation Transfer Function in Optical and Electro-Optical Systems (Bellingham: SPIE Press)
Bracewell, R. N. 1978, The Fourier Transform and its Applications (New York: McGraw-Hill)
Bracewell, R. N. 1995, Two Dimensional Imaging (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall), 365
Chance, K., Kurosu, T. P., & Sioris, C. E. 2005, ApOpt, 44, 1296
Clarke, T. W., Frater, R. H., Large, M. I., Munro, R. E. B., & Murdoch, H. S. 1969, AuJPA, 10, 3
Eadie, W. T., Dryard, D., James, F. E., Roos, M., & Sadoulet, B. 1971, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 146
Fischer, R. E., Tadic-Galeb, B., & Yoder, P. R. 2008, Optical System Design (New York: McGraw-Hill)
Fruchter, A. S. 2011, PASP, 123, 497
Fruchter, A. S., & Hook, R. N. 2002, PASP, 114, 144
Goad, L., Roddier, F., Beckers, J., & Eisenhardt, P. 1986, Proc. SPIE, 628, 305
Guyonnet, A., Astier, P., Antilogus, P., Regnault, N., & Doherty, P. 2015, A&A, 575, A41
Hamming, R. W. 1983, Digital Filters (2nd edn.; Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall), 30
Jorden, P. R., Deltorn, J.-M. and Oates, A. P. 1994, Proc. SPIE, 2198, 836
Lauer, T. R. 1999a, PASP, 111, 227
Lauer, T. R. 1999b, PASP, 111, 1434
Mayor, M., et al. 2003, ESO Messenger, 114, 20
Rasmussen, A. J. 2014, JInst, 9, C04027
Robertson, J. G. 2013, PASA, 30, 48 (Paper 1)
Rousset, G. 1999, in Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, ed. Roddier, F. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 115
Saunders, W. 2014, Proc. SPIE, 9147, 60
Saunders, W., et al. 2004, SPIE, 5492, 389
Spinhirne, J. M., et al. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3353, 22
Stubbs, C. W. 2014, JInst, 9, C03032
Vollmerhausen, R. H., Reago, D. A., & Driggers, R. G. 2010, Analysis and Evaluation of Sampled Imaging Systems (Bellingham: SPIE Press)
Widenhorn, R., Weber-Bargioni, A., Blouke, M. M., Bae, A. J., & Bodegom, E. 2010, OptEn, 49, 044401
Yaroslavsky, L. P. 2013, Theoretical Foundations of Digital Imaging using MATLAB (Boca Raton: CRC Press), 83
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
  • ISSN: 1323-3580
  • EISSN: 1448-6083
  • URL: /core/journals/publications-of-the-astronomical-society-of-australia
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 29th August 2017 - 23rd March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.