Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 252
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Amann-Winkel, Katrin Bellissent-Funel, Marie-Claire Bove, Livia E. Loerting, Thomas Nilsson, Anders Paciaroni, Alessandro Schlesinger, Daniel and Skinner, Lawrie 2016. X-ray and Neutron Scattering of Water. Chemical Reviews, Vol. 116, Issue. 13, p. 7570.

    Bernhardt, Marten Priebe, Marius Osterhoff, Markus Wollnik, Carina Diaz, Ana Salditt, Tim and Rehfeldt, Florian 2016. X-Ray Micro- and Nanodiffraction Imaging on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Differentiated Cells. Biophysical Journal, Vol. 110, Issue. 3, p. 680.

    Borges, Júlio C. Seraphim, Thiago V. Dores-Silva, Paulo R. and Barbosa, Leandro R. S. 2016. A review of multi-domain and flexible molecular chaperones studies by small-angle X-ray scattering. Biophysical Reviews, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 107.

    Bruetzel, Linda K. Fischer, Stefan Salditt, Annalena Sedlak, Steffen M. Nickel, Bert and Lipfert, Jan 2016. A Mo-anode-based in-house source for small-angle X-ray scattering measurements of biological macromolecules. Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 87, Issue. 2, p. 025103.

    Bruetzel, Linda K. Gerling, Thomas Sedlak, Steffen M. Walker, Philipp U. Zheng, Wenjun Dietz, Hendrik and Lipfert, Jan 2016. Conformational Changes and Flexibility of DNA Devices Observed by Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. Nano Letters,

    Cleverley, Robert M. Rismondo, Jeanine Lockhart-Cairns, Michael P. Van Bentum, Paulien T. Egan, Alexander J.F. Vollmer, Waldemar Halbedel, Sven Baldock, Clair Breukink, Eefjan and Lewis, Richard J. 2016. Subunit Arrangement in GpsB, a Regulator of Cell Wall Biosynthesis. Microbial Drug Resistance,

    Fernandez-Barranco, Cristina Kozioł, Anna E. Skrzypiec, Krzysztof Rawski, Michał Drewniak, Marek and Yebra-Rodriguez, Africa 2016. Study of spatial distribution of sepiolite in sepiolite/polyamide6,6 nanocomposites. Applied Clay Science, Vol. 127-128, p. 129.

    Fernandez-Barranco, Cristina Kozioł, Anna E. Skrzypiec, Krzysztof Rawski, Michał Drewniak, Marek and Yebra-Rodriguez, Africa 2016. Reprint of Study of spatial distribution of sepiolite in sepiolite/polyamide6,6 nanocomposites. Applied Clay Science,

    Gonçalves, Karen M. Junior, Ivaldo I. Papadimitriou, Vassiliki Zoumpanioti, Maria Leal, Ivana C. R. de Souza, Rodrigo O. M. A. Cordeiro, Yraima and Xenakis, Aristotelis 2016. Nanoencapsulated Lecitase Ultra andThermomyces lanuginosusLipase, a Comparative Structural Study. Langmuir, Vol. 32, Issue. 26, p. 6746.

    Hansen, Steen 2016. Estimation of the density distribution from small-angle scattering data. Journal of Applied Crystallography, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 856.

    Jain, Rohit Khan, Nazimuddin Menzel, Andreas Rajkovic, Ivan Konrad, Manfred and Techert, Simone 2016. Insights into open/closed conformations of the catalytically active human guanylate kinase as investigated by small-angle X-ray scattering. European Biophysics Journal, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 81.

    Koutsioubas, Alexandros Jaksch, Sebastian and Pérez, Javier 2016. DENFERTversion 2: extension ofab initiostructural modelling of hydrated biomolecules to the case of small-angle neutron scattering data. Journal of Applied Crystallography, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 690.

    Liu, Jun Li, Zhihong Wei, Yanru Wang, Wenjia Wang, Bing Liang, Hongli and Gao, Yuxi 2016. Measurement of protein size in concentrated solutions by small angle X-ray scattering. Protein Science, Vol. 25, Issue. 8, p. 1385.

    Mao, Yimin Su, Ying and Hsiao, Benjamin S. 2016. Probing structure and orientation in polymers using synchrotron small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering techniques. European Polymer Journal, Vol. 81, p. 433.

    Pollock, Naomi L. Satriano, Letizia Zegarra-Moran, Olga Ford, Robert C. and Moran, Oscar 2016. Structure of wild type and mutant F508del CFTR: A small-angle X-ray scattering study of the protein–detergent complexes. Journal of Structural Biology, Vol. 194, Issue. 1, p. 102.

    Tokuda, Joshua M. Pabit, Suzette A. and Pollack, Lois 2016. Protein–DNA and ion–DNA interactions revealed through contrast variation SAXS. Biophysical Reviews, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 139.

    Vavra, Kevin C. Xia, Youlin and Rock, Ronald S. 2016. Competition between Coiled-Coil Structures and the Impact on Myosin-10 Bundle Selection. Biophysical Journal, Vol. 110, Issue. 11, p. 2517.

    Vestergaard, Bente 2016. Analysis of biostructural changes, dynamics, and interactions – Small-angle X-ray scattering to the rescue. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Vol. 602, p. 69.

    Weigand, Steven Filippova, Ekaterina V. Kiryukhina, Olga and Anderson, Wayne F. 2016. Small angle X-ray scattering data and structure factor fitting for the study of the quaternary structure of the spermidine N-acetyltransferase SpeG. Data in Brief, Vol. 6, p. 47.

    Yabukarski, Filip Leyrat, Cedric Martinez, Nicolas Communie, Guillaume Ivanov, Ivan Ribeiro, Euripedes A. Buisson, Marlyse Gerard, Francine C. Bourhis, Jean-Marie Jensen, Malene Ringkjøbing Bernadó, Pau Blackledge, Martin and Jamin, Marc 2016. Ensemble Structure of the Highly Flexible Complex Formed between Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Unassembled Nucleoprotein and its Phosphoprotein Chaperone. Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 428, Issue. 13, p. 2671.


Small-angle scattering: a view on the properties, structures and structural changes of biological macromolecules in solution

  • Michel H. J. Koch (a1), Patrice Vachette (a2) and Dmitri I. Svergun (a1) (a3)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 23 October 2003

1. Introduction 148

2. Basics of X-ray and neutron scattering 149

2.1 Elastic scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a single electron 149

2.2 Scattering by assemblies of electrons 151

2.3 Anomalous scattering and long wavelengths 153

2.4 Neutron scattering 153

2.5 Transmission and attenuation 155

3. Small-angle scattering from solutions 156

3.1 Instrumentation 156

3.2 The experimental scattering pattern 157

3.3 Basic scattering functions 159

3.4 Global structural parameters 161

3.4.1 Monodisperse systems 161

3.4.2 Polydisperse systems and mixtures 163

3.5 Characteristic functions 164

4. Modelling 166

4.1 Spherical harmonics 166

4.2 Shannon sampling 169

4.3 Shape determination 170

4.3.1 Modelling with few parameters: molecular envelopes 171

4.3.2 Modelling with many parameters: bead models 173

4.4 Modelling domain structure and missing parts of high-resolution models 178

4.5 Computing scattering patterns from atomic models 184

4.6 Rigid-body refinement 187

5. Applications 190

5.1 Contrast variation studies of ribosomes 190

5.2 Structural changes and catalytic activity of the allosteric enzyme ATCase 191

6. Interactions between molecules in solution 203

6.1 Linearizing the problem for moderate interactions: the second virial coefficient 204

6.2 Determination of the structure factor 205

7. Time-resolved measurements 211

8. Conclusions 215

9. Acknowledgements 216

10. References 216

A self-contained presentation of the main concepts and methods for interpretation of X-ray and neutron-scattering patterns of biological macromolecules in solution, including a reminder of the basics of X-ray and neutron scattering and a brief overview of relevant aspects of modern instrumentation, is given. For monodisperse solutions the experimental data yield the scattering intensity of the macromolecules, which depends on the contrast between the solvent and the particles as well as on their shape and internal scattering density fluctuations, and the structure factor, which is related to the interactions between macromolecules. After a brief analysis of the information content of the scattering intensity, the two main approaches for modelling the shape and/or structure of macromolecules and the global minimization schemes used in the calculations are presented. The first approach is based, in its more advanced version, on the spherical harmonics approximation and relies on few parameters, whereas the second one uses bead models with thousands of parameters. Extensions of bead modelling can be used to model domain structure and missing parts in high-resolution structures. Methods for computing the scattering patterns from atomic models including the contribution of the hydration shell are discussed and examples are given, which also illustrate that significant differences sometimes exist between crystal and solution structures. These differences are in some cases explainable in terms of rigid-body motions of parts of the structures. Results of two extensive studies – on ribosomes and on the allosteric protein aspartate transcarbamoylase – illustrate the application of the various methods. The unique bridge between equilibrium structures and thermodynamic or kinetic aspects provided by scattering techniques is illustrated by modelling of intermolecular interactions, including crystallization, based on an analysis of the structure factor and recent time-resolved work on assembly and protein folding.

Corresponding author
Michel Koch, European Molecular Biology Laboratory – Hamburg Outstation, EMBL c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: +49-40-89902-113; Fax: +49-40-89902-149; E-mail:
Patrice Vachette, LURE, Université Paris-Sud BP34, F-91898, Orsay Cédex, France. Tel.: +33-1-64468855; Fax: +33-1-64464148; E-mail:
Dmitri Svergun, European Molecular Biology Laboratory – Hamburg Outstation, EMBL c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: +49-40-89902-125; Fax: +49-40-89902-149; E-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
  • ISSN: 0033-5835
  • EISSN: 1469-8994
  • URL: /core/journals/quarterly-reviews-of-biophysics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *