Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-bjz6k Total loading time: 0.274 Render date: 2022-05-16T12:38:06.622Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Supernovae and Single-Year Anomalies in the Atmospheric Radiocarbon Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Michael Dee*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford – RLAHA, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
Benjamin Pope
Affiliation:
University of Oxford – Physics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
Daniel Miles
Affiliation:
University of Oxford – RLAHA, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
Sturt Manning
Affiliation:
Cornell University – Cornell Tree-Ring Laboratory, Ithaca, New York, USA
Fusa Miyake
Affiliation:
Nagoya University – ISEE, Nagoya, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: michael.dee@rlaha.ox.ac.uk.

Abstract

Single-year spikes in radiocarbon production are caused by intense bursts of radiation from space. Supernovae emit both high-energy particle and electromagnetic radiation, but it is the latter that is most likely to strike the atmosphere all at once and cause a surge in 14C production. In the 1990s, it was claimed that the supernova in 1006 CE produced exactly this effect. With the 14C spikes in the years 775 and 994 CE now attributed to extreme solar events, attention has returned to the question of whether historical supernovae are indeed detectable using annual 14C measurements. Here, we combine new and existing measurements over six documented and putative supernovae, and conclude that no such astrophysical event has yet left a distinct imprint on the past atmospheric 14C record.

Type
Rapid Event in the Natural Atmospheric 14C Content
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

Baldwin, GC, Kleiber, GS. 1947. Photo-fission in heavy elements. Physical Review Letters 71(1):310.Google Scholar
Balona, LA, Broomhall, A-M, Kosovichev, A, Nakariakov, VM, Pugh, CE, van Doorsselaere, T. 2015. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450:956966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benitez, N, Maíz-Apellániz, J, Canelles, M. 2002. Evidence for nearby supernova explosions. Physical Review Letters 88:081101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, F, Higham, TFG, Ditchfield, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2010. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52(1):103112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG, Leach, P. 2004. Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46(1):1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, GS. 2013. Radiocarbon dating: causes of temporal variations. In: Elias SA, Mock CJ, editors. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier. p 336344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, BE, Lehtinen, NG, Inan, US. 2010. Neutron production in terrestrial gamma ray flashes. Journal of Geophysical Research 115:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Y-N, Huang, Y-L. 1994. Identification of the guest star of AD 185 as a comet rather than a supernova. Nature 371(6496):398399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliver, EW, Tylka, AJ, Dietrich, WF, Ling, AG. 2014. On a solar origin for the cosmogenic nuclide event of 775 A.D. The Astrophysical Journal 781:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, PE, Kaimei, D, Kocharov, GE, Mikheevai, IB, Peristykh, AN. 1995. Radiocarbon production by the gamma-ray component of supernovae explosions. Radiocarbon 37(2):599604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, D, Mordecai, D. 2012. Comet encounters and carbon 14. The Astrophysical Journal 761:L27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J, Schramm, DN. 1995. Could a nearby supernova explosion have caused a mass extinction? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92(1):235238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestone, RB. 2014. Observation of 23 supernovae that exploded <300 pc from Earth during the past 300 kyr. The Astrophysical Journal 789:29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrels, N, Laird, CM, Jackman, CM, Cannizzo, JK, Mattson, BJ, Chen, W. 2003. Ozone depletion from nearby supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal 585:11691176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DA, Stephenson, FR. 2003. The historical supernovae. In: Weiler KW, editor. Supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursters. New York: Springer. p 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güttler, D, Adolphi, F, Beer, J, Bleicherd, N, Boswijke, G, Christl, M, Hogg, A, Palmer, J, Vockenhuber, C, Wacker, L, Wundereet, J. 2015. Rapid increase in cosmogenic radiocarbon in AD 775 measured in New Zealand kauri trees indicates short-lived increase in radiocarbon production spanning both hemispheres. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 411:290297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambaryan, VV, Neuhäuser, R. 2013. A galactic short gamma-ray burst as cause for the 14C peak in AD 774/5. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430:3236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, AJT, Panyushkina, IP, Lange, TE, Kukarskih, VV, Myglan, VS, Clark, KJ, Salzer, MW, Burr, GS, Leavitt, SW. 2014. Excursions in the 14C record at A.D. 774–775 in tree rings from Russia and America. Geophysical Research Letters 41(8):30043010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepler, J. 1606. De stella nova in pede Serpentarii. Prague: Typis Pauli Sessii.Google Scholar
Kidger, M. 1999. The Star of Bethlehem, an Astronomers View. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lal, D, Peters, B. 1967. Cosmic ray produced radioactivity on the Earth. In: Sitte K, editor. Encyclopedia of Physics, Volume 9. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 551612.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Naegler, T, Kromer, B, Diehl, M, Francey, RJ, Gomez-Pelaez, AJ, Steele, LP, Wagenbach, D, Weller, R, Worthy, D. 2010. Observations and modelling of the global distribution and long-term trend of atmospheric 14CO2 . Tellus 62(1):2646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingenfelter, RE. 1963. Production of carbon 14 by cosmic-ray neutrons. Reviews of Geophysics 1(1):3555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maehara, H, Shibayama, T, Notsu, S, Nagao, T, Kusaba, S, Honda, S, Nogami, D, Shibata, K. 2012. Superflares on solar-type stars. Nature 485(7399):478481.Google ScholarPubMed
Maehara, H, Shibayama, T, Notsu, Y, Notsu, S, Honda, S, Nogami, D, Shibata, K. 2015. Statistical properties of superflares on solar-type stars based on 1-min cadence data. Earth, Planets and Space 67:59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masarik, J, Beer, J. 2009. An updated simulation of particle fluxes and cosmogenic nuclide production in the Earth’s atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 114:D11103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekhaldi, F, Muscheler, R, Adolphi, F, Aldahan, A, Beer, J, McConnell, JR, Possnert, G, Sigl, M, Svensson, A, Synal, H-A, Welten, KC, Woodruff, TE. 2015. Multiradionuclide evidence for the solar origin of the cosmic-ray events of AD 774/5 and 993/4. Nature Communications 6:8611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melott, AL, Thomas, BC. 2012. Causes of an AD 774–775 14C increase. Nature 491(7426):E1E2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melott, AL, Usoskin, IG, Kovaltsov, GA, Laird, CM. 2015. Has the Earth been exposed to numerous supernovae within the last 300 kyr? International Journal of Astrobiology 14(3):375378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjo, H, Miyahara, H, Kuwana, K, Masuda, K, Muraki, Y, Nakamura, T. 2005. Possibility of the detection of past supernova explosion by radiocarbon measurement. In: Proceedings of the 29 th International Cosmic Ray Conference. Volume 2. Pune. p 357–60.Google Scholar
Miles, DWH. 2002. The tree-ring dating of the roof carpentry of the Eastern Chapels, North Nave Triforium, and North Porch, Salisbury Cathedral, Wiltshire, Centre for Archaeology Report 94/2002. Portsmouth: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Miyake, F, Nagaya, K, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2012. A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774–775 from tree rings in Japan. Nature 486(7402):240242.Google ScholarPubMed
Miyake, F, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2013. Another rapid event in the carbon-14 content of tree rings. Nature Communications 4:17481752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Notsu, Y, Shibayama, T, Maehara, H, Notsu, S, Nagao, T, Honda, S, Ishii, TT, Nogami, D, Shibata, K. 2013. Superflares on solar-type stars observed with Kepler II. Photometric variability of superflare-generating stars: a signature of stellar rotation and starspots. The Astrophysical Journal 771(2):127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, AK, Blinov, AV, Vasilyev, GI, Vdovina, MA, Volkov, PA, Konstantinov, AN, Ostryakov, VM. 2013. Gamma-ray bursts and the production of cosmogenic radionuclides in the Earth’s Atmosphere. Astronomy Letters 39(9):571577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinec, P, Tokar, T. 1979. Gamma-rays from supernovae and radiocarbon production. In: Miyake S. Proceedings of 16 th International Cosmic Rays Conference. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. p 237–42.Google Scholar
Reid, GC, McAfee, JR, Crutzen, PJ. 1978. Effects of intense stratospheric ionisation events. Nature 275(5680):489492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):18691887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruderman, MA. 1974. Possible consequences of nearby supernova explosions for atmospheric ozone and terrestrial life. Science 184(4141):10791081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, BE. 1995. ‘Supernova’ 185 is really a nova plus comet P-Swift/Tuttle. The Astronomical Journal 110(4):17931795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staff, RA, Reynard, L, Brock, F, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2014. Wood pretreatment protocols and measurement of tree-ring standards at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 56(2):709715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, FR. 2015. Astronomical evidence relating to the observed 14C increases in A.D. 774–5 and 993–4 as determined from tree rings. Advances in Space Research 55(6):15371545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, FR, Clark, DH, Crawford, DF. 1977. The supernova of AD 1006. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 180:567664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, RG. 2008. The origin and meaning of colourful descriptions in ancient Chinese records. Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 11(2):8796.Google Scholar
Tammann, GA, Löffler, W, Schröder, A. 1994. The galactic supernova rate. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 92:487493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, BC, Melott, AL, Arkenberg, KR, Snyder, BR. 2013. Terrestrial effects of possible astrophysical sources of an AD 774-775 increase in 14C production. Geophysical Research Letters 40:12371240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipler, FJ. 2005. The Star of Bethlehem: a type Ia/Ic supernova in the Andromeda galaxy? The Observatory 125:168174.Google Scholar
Tse-Tsung, H. 1957. A new catalog of novae recorded in the Chinese and Japanese Chronicles. Soviet Astronomy 1:161.Google Scholar
Usoskin, IG, Kromer, B, Ludlow, F, Beer, J, Friedrich, M, Kovaltsov, GA, Solanki, SK, Wacker, L. 2013. The AD 775 cosmic event revisited: the sun is to blame. Astronomy and Astrophysics L3:14.Google Scholar
Wichmann, R, Fuhrmeister, B, Wolter, U, Nagel, E. 2014. Kepler super-flare stars: what are they? Astronomy & Astrophysics 567:A36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, F-Y, Strom, RG, Jiang, S-Y. 2006. The guest star of AD185 must have been a supernova. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 6(5):635640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Dee supplementary material

Figure S1 and Tables S1-S2

Download Dee supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 141 KB
14
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Supernovae and Single-Year Anomalies in the Atmospheric Radiocarbon Record
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Supernovae and Single-Year Anomalies in the Atmospheric Radiocarbon Record
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Supernovae and Single-Year Anomalies in the Atmospheric Radiocarbon Record
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *