Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:04:15.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Removal of Conservation Substances by “Soxhlet“-Type Extraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Frank Bruhn*
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Labor für Altersbestimmung und Isotopenforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Max-Eyth-Str. 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Alexander Duhr
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Labor für Altersbestimmung und Isotopenforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Max-Eyth-Str. 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Pieter M Grootes
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Labor für Altersbestimmung und Isotopenforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Max-Eyth-Str. 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Annette Mintrop
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Labor für Altersbestimmung und Isotopenforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Max-Eyth-Str. 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Marie-Josée Nadeau
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Labor für Altersbestimmung und Isotopenforschung, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Max-Eyth-Str. 11, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: fbruhn@leibniz.uni-kiel.de.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the Leibniz radiocarbon lab, art and archaeological objects, often chemically conserved and thus potentially contaminated with respect to their 14C content, are treated using a computer-controlled “Soxhlet”-type series extractor. This device uses a continuous procedure of boiling and condensation of different solvents for extraction and vacuum filtration under constant process conditions. An elutrope sequence of five solvents that dissolve most customary conservation chemicals was selected. A study of these different contaminants applied to reference wood samples with subsequent accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurements demonstrates that their effective removal is dependent on the use of adequate solvents. For many contaminants (e.g. wood glue, methyl cellulose, Klucel®, sugar, and polyethylene glycol), routine acid-alkali-acid (AAA) treatment already yields satisfactory results, whereas for Caparol® and beeswax a relatively “mild” treatment with acetone, methanol, water, and subsequent standard AAA extraction is sufficient. Complete removal of rubber glue, epoxy resin, and paraffin can only be accomplished with our full set of solvents. The latter procedure is also appropriate when no or only incomplete information about the type of conservation material is available. For epoxy resin the contamination appears to be enriched in the alkali residue, and the easily soluble “humic acid” fraction, even after standard AAA treatment, gives satisfactory results. Two case studies on the application of the extraction procedures are presented.

Type
I. Becoming Better
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Daniels, V. 1981. Removal of epoxy resins from antiquities. Conservation News 16:11.Google Scholar
Horie, CV. 198. Materials for conservation: organic consolidants, adhesives and coatings. Oxford: Architectural Press. 281 p.Google Scholar
Matthäus, B, Brühl, L. 1999. Vergleich eines neuen Feststoff-Wirbelstrom-Extraktionsverfahrens mit der DGF-Standardmethode B-1% (87) zur Bestimmung des Ölgehaltes von Ölsaaten. GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift 2(99): 151–5.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Schleicher, M, Grootes, PM, Erlenkeuser, H, Gottdang, A, Mous, DJW, Sarnthein, JM, Willkomm, H. 1997. The Leibniz-Labor AMS facility at the Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B123:2230.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM, Schleicher, M, Hasselberg, P, Rieck, A, Bitterling, M. 1998. Sample throughput and data quality at the Leibniz-Labor AMS facility. Radiocarbon 40(1):239245.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Burk, RL, Quay, PD. 1984. 13C/12C ratios in tree rings and the transfer of biospheric carbon to the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 89(D7):11,73148.Google Scholar