Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:55:59.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Converting AMS Data to Radiocarbon Values: Considerations and Conventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A P McNichol
Affiliation:
NOSAMS, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA. Email: amcnichol@whoi.edu.
A J T Jull
Affiliation:
NSF Arizona AMS Facility, Physics Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA
G S Burr
Affiliation:
NSF Arizona AMS Facility, Physics Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We summarize the basic operation of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) systems used to measure radiocarbon and discuss the calculations used to convert AMS output to 14C data.

Type
II. Getting More from the Data
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Baker, RTK, Harris, PS. 1978. The formation of filamentous carbon. In: Walker, PL, Thrower, PA, editors. Chemistry and physics of carbon. Volume 14. p 83165.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Hedges, REM. 1997. Hybrid ion sources: radiocarbon measurements from microgram to milligram. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B123:539–45.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Southon, JR. 1997. Corrections for contamination background in AMS 14C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B123:208–13.Google Scholar
Donahue, DJ, Linick, TW, Jull, AJT. 1990. Isotope-ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32(2):135–42.Google Scholar
Fifield, LK. 1996. Accelerator mass spectrometry, large and small. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A382:292–8.Google Scholar
Guinot, J, Audier, M, Coulon, M, Bonnetain, L. 1981. Formation and characterization of catalytic carbons obtained from CO disproportionation over an Iron Nickel catalyst I. Fragmentation and rates of carbon deposition. Carbon 19:95–8.Google Scholar
Linick, TW, Damon, PE, Donahue, DJ, Jull, AJT. 1989. Accelerator mass spectrometry: the new revolution in radiocarbon dating. Quaternary International 1:1–6.Google Scholar
Mook, W, van der Plicht, J. 1999. Reporting 14C activities and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41(3): 227–9.Google Scholar
Pearson, A, McNichol, AP, Schneider, RJ, von Reden, KF, Zheng, Y. 1998. Microscale AMS 14C measurement at NOSAMS. Radiocarbon 40(1):6175.Google Scholar
Rutherford, WM, Liner, JC. 1970. Preparation of elemental 13C and K13CN from 13CO2 . International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 21:71–3.Google Scholar
Schneider, RJ, Jones, GA, McNichol, AP, von Reden, KF, Elder, KL, Huang, K, Kessel, ED. 1994. Methods for data screening, flagging and error analysis at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B92:172–5.Google Scholar
Schneider, RJ, McNichol, AP, Nadeau, MJ, von Reden, KF. 1995. Measurements of the oxalic acid II/oxalic acid I ratio as a quality control parameter at NOSAMS. Radiocarbon 37(2):693–6.Google Scholar
Schneider, RJ, von Reden, KF, Hayes, JM, Wills, JSC, Kern, WGE, Kim, S-W. 2000. Test of positive ion beams from a microwave ion source for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B172: 252–6.Google Scholar
Seguin, FH, Schneider, RJ, Jones, GA, von Reden, KF. 1994. Optimized data analysis for AMS radiocarbon dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B92:176–81.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, B. 1999. 8th International Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. 6–10 September 1999. Palais Auersperg, Vienna, Austria. Conference Compendium.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, H. 1997. Reporting 14C data. Radiocarbon 19:355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M, Jacob, SWA, Synal, H-A. 2000. Tandem AMS at sub-MeV energies – status and prospects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B172: 144–51.Google Scholar
Synal, H-A, Jacob, S, Suter, M, Schroeder, JB. 1999. 8th International Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, 6–10 September 1999. Palais Auersperg, Vienna, Austria. Conference Compendium Google Scholar
Tuniz, C, Bird, JR, Fink, D, Herzog, GF. 1998. Accelerator mass spectrometry: ultrasensitive analysis for global science. CRC Press.Google Scholar