Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-8ckrc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-23T15:24:19.952Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion Reporting of 14C Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Minze Stuiver  and
Henry A Polach
Minze Stuiver
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Henry A Polach
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not possible as this article does not have html content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Count rates, representing the rate of 14C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14C data reporting (table 1) causes headaches to many. Minor deflections in pathway, depending on personal interpretations, are possible and give end results that are not always useful for inter-laboratory comparisons. This discussion is an attempt to identify some of these problems and to recommend certain procedures by which reporting ambiguities can be avoided.

Type
Discussion
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , 1977 , pp. 355 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Broecker, W S, and Olson, E A, 1959, Lamont radiocarbon measurements VI: Radiocarbon, v 1, p 111–132.Google Scholar
Flint, R F and Deevey, E S, 1961, Editorial statement: Radiocarbon Supp, Am Jour Sci, v 3.Google Scholar
Godwin, Harry, 1962, Radiocarbon dating: Nature, v 195, no. 4845, p 943–945.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, 1970, The use of Oxalic acid as a Standard, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology, Nobel symposium, 12th Proc: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 17.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, 1969, Optimisation of liquid scintillation radiocarbon age determinations and reporting of ages: Atomic Energy in Australia, v 12, no. 3, p 21–28.Google Scholar
Polach, H A 1976, Radiocarbon dating as a research tool in archaeology-hopes and limitations, in Barnard, Noel, ed, Symposium on scientific methods of research in the study of ancient Chinese Bronzes and South East Asian metal and other archaeological artifacts Proc: Australian Natl Univ, Dept Far Eastern History Pub. Google Scholar
Rafter, T A and Grant-Taylor, T, compilers, 1972, Internat conf on radiocarbon dating, 8th internat conf on Radiocarbon Dating Proc, October, 1972, Royal Soc New Zealand, v 1, p 1.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, and Robinson, S W, 1974, University of Washington Geosecs North Atlantic carbon-14 results: Earth and Planetary Sci Letters, v 23, p 87–90.Google Scholar