Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-ggg9q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-10T19:09:22.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extraction and AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Pollen from Lake Baikal Sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Natalia Piotrowska ,
Andrzej Bluszcz ,
Dieter Demske ,
Wojciech Granoszewski  and
Georg Heumann
Natalia Piotrowska*
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Department of Radioisotopes, Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Andrzej Bluszcz
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Department of Radioisotopes, Krzywoustego 2, PL-44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Dieter Demske
Affiliation:
FU Berlin, Institute of Geological Sciences (Palaeontology), Malteserstr. 74-100, D-12249 Berlin, Germany.
Wojciech Granoszewski
Affiliation:
Polish Geological Institute, Carpathian Branch, Skrzatów 1, PL-31-560 Kraków, Poland. Also: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, PAN, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Kraków, Poland.
Georg Heumann
Affiliation:
University Bonn, Institute of Palaeontology, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
*
Corresponding author. Email: natalia.piotrowska@carbon14.pl.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This work focuses on the preparation and dating of sporomorph (pollen and spores) concentrates of high purity. Three sediment cores recovered from Lake Baikal within the EU-Project CONTINENT were subjected to palynological analyses and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dating. Laboratory processing of concentrates was aimed at the removal of non-sporomorph organic matter by means of chemical treatment, micro-sieving, and heavy liquid separation. The obtained concentrates were checked under the microscope and sample purity was estimated on the basis of particle counts. The results of AMS 14C dating show differences in the sedimentation rate among 3 sites of Lake Baikal.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 46 , Issue 1: Proceedings of the 18th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 2), Conference Editors: Nancy Beavan Athfield, Rodger J Sparks , 2004 , pp. 181 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon program OxCal. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Mathewes, RW, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1989. Radiocarbon dating of pollen by accelerator mass spectrometry. Quaternary Research 32: 205–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, SM, Jones, GA, Rubin, M, King, JW, Peck, JA, Orem, WH. 1996. AMS radiocarbon analyses from Lake Baikal, Siberia: challenges of dating sediments from a large, oligotrophic lake. Quaternary Science Reviews 15:669–84.Google Scholar
Czernik, J, Goslar, T. 2001. Preparation of graphite targets in the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory for AMS 14C dating. Radiocarbon 43(2A):283–91.Google Scholar
Erdtman, G. 1969. Handbook of Palynology: Morphology - Taxonomy - Ecology, An Introduction to the Study of Pollen Grains and Spores. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. 486 p.Google Scholar
Goslar, T, Czernik, J. 2000. Sample preparation in the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory for AMS 14C dating of sediments. Geochronometria 18:1–8.Google Scholar
Goslar, T, Czernik, J, Goslar, E. Forthcoming. Low-energy 14C AMS in Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B. Google Scholar
Horiuchi, K, Minoura, K, Hoshino, K, Oda, T, Nakamura, T, Kawai, T. 2000. Palaeoenvironmental history of Lake Baikal during the last 23000 years. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 157:95–108.Google Scholar
Jöris, O, Weninger, B. 1998. Extension of the 14C calibration curve to ca. 40,000 cal BC by synchronizing Greenland 18O/16O ice core records and North Atlantic foraminifera profiles: a comparison with U/Th coral data. Radiocarbon 40(1):495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, MR, van der Plicht, J, van Geel, B, Goslar, T. 2002. Problematic 14C-AMS dates of pollen concentrates from Lake Gosciqz (Poland). Quaternary International 88(1):21–6.Google Scholar
Morgenroth, G, Kerscher, H, Kretschmer, W, Klein, M, Reichel, M, Tully, T, Wrzosok, I. 2000. Improved sample preparation techniques at the Erlangen AMS Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B 172:416–23.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, T, Brugiapaglia, E, Digerfeldt, G, Reille, M, de Beaulieu, J-L, Yasuda, Y. 1998. Dense-media separation as a more efficient pollen extraction method for use with organic sediment/deposit samples: comparison with the conventional methods. Boreas 27:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnéll, J. 1992. Preparing pollen concentrates for AMS dating—a methodological study from a hard-water lake in southern Sweden. Boreas 21:373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnéll, J, Everitt, E. 1996. Preparative centrifugation—a new method for preparing pollen concentrates for radiocarbon dating by AMS. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 5:201–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. INTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weninger, B, Jöris, O, Danzeglocke, U. 2003. Climate archaeology with Fortran. Fortran Source 19(1) Spring 2003. Lahey Computer Systems, Inc. Google Scholar
Zhou, WJ, Donahue, D, Jull, AJT. 1997. Radiocarbon AMS dating of pollen concentrated from eolian sediments: implications for monsoon climate change since the Late Quaternary. Radiocarbon 39(1):19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar