Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T05:32:10.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The IAEA 14C Intercomparison Exercise 1990

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Kazimierz Rozanski ,
Willibald Stichler ,
Roberto Gonfiantini ,
E. M. Scott ,
R. P. Beukens ,
Bernd Kromer  and
Johannes Van Der Plicht
Kazimierz Rozanski
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
Willibald Stichler
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
Roberto Gonfiantini
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
E. M. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QW Scotland
R. P. Beukens
Affiliation:
Isotrace Laboratory, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A7 Canada
Bernd Kromer
Affiliation:
Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 366, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
Johannes Van Der Plicht
Affiliation:
Centre for Isotope Research, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

As a follow-up to the meeting of experts convened at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in February 1989, and the International 14C Workshop held in Glasgow in September 1989, the 14C Quality Assurance Program was formulated. In a joint effort of several radiocarbon teams and IAEA staff, we have prepared a set of five new intercomparison materials. These are natural materials frequently used by radiocarbon laboratories. The materials were distributed to 137 laboratories in May 1990. In February 1991, a meeting of experts was convened in Vienna to evaluate the results, to determine the radiocarbon activity of the five samples expressed in % Modern (pMC) terms and to define the 13C/12C ratio, and to make recommendations on further use of these materials. We present here the results of the exercise and the agreed consensus values for each of the five materials and discuss the different analyses that were undertaken.

Information

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 14th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1992 , pp. 506 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Aitchison, T. C., Scott, E. M., Harkness, D. D., Baxter, M. S. and Cook, G. T. 1990 Report on Stage 3 of the International Collaborative Program. In Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of 14C Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 271–278.Google Scholar
Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F., Scott, E. M., Baxter, M. S. and Aitchison, T. C. 1990 International Collaborative Study: Structuring and sample preparation. In Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of 14C Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, L. A. and Polach, H. A. 1980 Exploratory analysis of the international radiocarbon cross-calibration data: Consensus values and interlaboratory error. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 22 (3): 933–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonfiantini, R., Rozanski, K. and Stichler, W. 1990 Intercalibration of environmental isotope measurements: The program of the International Atomic Energy Agency. In Scott, E. M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercomparison of 14C Laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3): 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Study Group 1982 An inter-laboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree-rings. Nature 298: 619–623.Google Scholar
International Study Group 1983 An international tree-ring replicate study. In Waterbolk, H. T. and Mook, W. G., eds., Proceedings of 14C and Archaeology. Pact 8: 123–133.Google Scholar
Mook, W. G. 1990 Special report from the Glasgow Intercomparison Workshop on quality control and assurance. Radiocarbon 32(1): 107–108.Google Scholar
Otlet, R. L., Walker, A. J., Hewson, A. D. and Burleigh, R. 1980 14C interlaboratory comparison in the UK: Experiment design, preparation and preliminary results. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 22(3): 936–947.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K. 1989 Consultants' group meeting on the C-14 quality assurance programme. Vienna, IAEA: 7 p.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K. 1991 Consultants' group meeting on C-14 reference materials for radiocarbon laboratories. Vienna, IAEA: 25 p.Google Scholar
Scott, E. M., Aitchison, T. C., Harkness, D. D., Cook, G. T. and Baxter, M. S. 1990 An overview of all three stages of the international radiocarbon intercomparison. Radiocarbon 32(3): 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E. M., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F., Cook, G. T. and Baxter, M. S. 1992 Announcement of a further international intercomparison exercise. Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. R. and Ward, G. K. 1981 Evaluation and clustering of radiocarbon age determinations: Procedures and paradigms. Archaeometry 23(1): 19–39.Google Scholar