Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:26:54.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification, Extraction, and Preparation of Reliable Lime Samples for 14C Dating of Plasters and Mortars with the “Pure Lime Lumps” Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Giovanni L A Pesce ,
Richard J Ball ,
Gianluca Quarta  and
Lucio Calcagnile
Giovanni L A Pesce*
Affiliation:
Institute for the History of Material Culture, c/o Museo di San Agostino piazza Sarzano 35r, 16128 Genoa, Italy Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
Richard J Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
Gianluca Quarta
Affiliation:
Centre for Dating and Diagnostics, Department of Engineering of Innovation, University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy
Lucio Calcagnile
Affiliation:
Centre for Dating and Diagnostics, Department of Engineering of Innovation, University of Salento, Via per Monteroni, 73100, Lecce, Italy
*
Corresponding author. Email: GL.A.Pesce@bath.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon dating was first applied to historic lime mortars during the 1960s. However, despite the relative simplicity of the technique in principle, a number of subsequent studies have highlighted important aspects that should be considered. One of the most significant of these challenges arises from sample contamination by carbonaceous substances such as incompletely burnt limestone and aggregates of fossil origin containing “dead” 14C. More recent studies have shown that in the majority of old lime-based mixtures the contamination problem can be avoided through selection of pure lime lumps. These particular types of lumps are believed to originate from areas where the lime is incompletely mixed with the aggregate. It has been demonstrated that even a single lime lump can provide sufficient material for a 14C date of the mortar from which the lump was taken (Pesce et al. 2009). This paper describes the practical challenges associated with location, extraction, and preparation of 4 lime lumps extracted from 2 new sites for 14C dating. These include distinguishing the lime lumps from other lumps present in the matrix and the removal of material surrounding the lime lump. The coherence of 14C dating with other archaeological information on the chronology of historic sites is highlighted through case studies.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 54 , Issue 3-4 , 2012 , pp. 933 - 942
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bakolas, A, Biscontin, G, Moropoulou, A, Zendri, E. 1995. Characterization of the lumps in the mortars of historic masonry. Thermochimica Acta 269–270:809–16.Google Scholar
Berger, R. 1992. 14C dating mortar in Ireland. Radiocarbon 34(3):880–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boato, A. 2008. L'Archeologia in Architettura. 1st edition. Venezia: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Boynton, RS. 1980. Chemistry and Technology of Lime and Limestone. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, S, Cariati, F, Fermo, P, Cariati, P, Alessandrini, G, Toniolo, L. 1997. White lumps in fifth- to seventeenth-century AD mortars from northern Italy. Archaeometry 39(1):1–7.Google Scholar
Bugini, R, Toniolo, L. 1990. La presenza di grumi bianchi nelle malte antiche: ipotesi sull'origine. Arkos 12:4–8.Google Scholar
Casarino, A, Pittaluga, D. 2001. An analysis of building methods: chemical-physical and archaeological analyses of micro-layer coatings on medieval facades in the centre of Genoa. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2(4):259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsen, J. 2006. Microscopy of historic mortars—a review. Cement and Concrete Research 36(8):1416–24.Google Scholar
Elsen, J, Brutsaert, A, Deckers, M, Brulet, R. 2004. Microscopical study of ancient mortars from Turnay (Belgium). Materials Characterization 53(2–4):289–94.Google Scholar
Fieni, L. 2002. La Basilica di San Lorenzo Maggiore a Milano tra età tardoantica e medioevo: metodologie di indagine archeometrica per lo studio dell'elevato. Archeologia dell'Architettura 7:51–98.Google Scholar
Folk, RL, Valastro, S Jr. 1976. Successful technique for dating of lime mortar by carbon-14. Journal of Field Archaeology 3(2):203–8.Google Scholar
Franzini, M, Leoni, L, Lezzerini, M, Sartori, F. 1990. On the binder of some ancient mortars. Mineralogy and Petrology 67(1–2):59–69.Google Scholar
Gallo, N. 2001. 14C e archeologia del costruito: il caso di Castello Aghinolfi (MS). Archeologia dell'architettura 4:31–6.Google Scholar
Gallo, N, Fieni, L, Martini, M, Sibilia, E. 1998. Archèologie du bati, 14C et thermolumiscence: deux exemples en comparaison. Actes du 3eme Congrés International 14C et Archéologie. Google Scholar
Goren, Y, Goring-Morris, AN. 2008. Early pyrotechnology in the Near East: experimental lime-plaster production at the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B site of Kfar HaHoresh, Israel. Geoarchaeology 23(6):779–98.Google Scholar
Hale, J, Heinemeier, J, Lancaster, L, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å. 2003. Dating ancient mortar. American Scientist 91:130–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Lindroos, A, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, ÁE. 2010. Successful AMS 14C dating of non-hydraulic lime mortars from the Medieval churches of the Aland Islands, Finland. Radiocarbon 52(1):171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, JP. 2005. Investigation of traditional lime mortars – the role of optical microscopy. Proceedings of the 10th Euroseminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials. p 1–18.Google Scholar
Karkanas, P. 2007. Identification of lime plaster in prehistory using petrographic methods: a review and reconsideration of the data on the basis of experimental and case studies. Geoarchaeology 22(7):775–96.Google Scholar
Leslie, AB, Hughes, JJ. 2002. Binder microstructure in lime mortars: implications for the interpretation of analysis results. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 35:257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Braskén, M, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, Á. 2007. Mortar dating using AMS 14C and sequential dissolution: examples from Medieval, non-hydraulic lime mortars from the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Radiocarbon 49(1):47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, M, Sibilia, E. 2006. Absolute date of historical buildings: the contribution of thermoluminescence (TL). Journal of Neutron Research 14(1):69–74.Google Scholar
Nawrocka, D, Michniewicz, J, Pawlyta, J, Pazdur, A. 2005. Application of radiocarbon method for dating of lime mortars. Geochronometria 24:109–15.Google Scholar
Pachiaudi, C, Marechal, J, Van Strydonck, M, Dupas, M, Dauchot-Dehon, M. 1986. Isotopic fractionation of carbon during CO2 absorption by mortar. Radiocarbon 28(2A):691–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesce, GLA, Quarta, G, Calcagnile, L, D'Elia, M, Cavaciocchi, P, Lastrico, C, Guastella, R. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of lumps from aerial lime mortars and plasters: methodological issues and results from the San Nicolò of Capodimonte church (Camogli, Genoa, Italy). Radiocarbon 51(2):867–72.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonninen, E, Junger, H. 2001. An improvement in preparation of mortar for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 43(2A):271–3.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Dupas, M, Dauchot-Dehon, M, Pachiaudi, C, Maréchal, J. 1986. The influence of contaminating (fossil) carbonate and the variations of δ13C in mortar dating. Radiocarbon 28(2A):702–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Strydonck, MK, Van der Borg, AFM, De Jong, EK. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of lime fractions and organic material from buildings. Radiocarbon 34(3):873–9.Google Scholar