Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:10:53.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Test of the EA-AGE3 System for 14C Measurement of CaCO3 Samples and Coral-Based Estimation of Marine Reservoir Correction in the Ogasawara Islands, Northwestern Subtropical Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2019

Yoko Saito-Kokubu ,
Takehiro Mitsuguchi ,
Takahiro Watanabe ,
Tsutomu Yamada ,
Ryuji Asami  and
Yasufumi Iryu Open the ORCID record for Yasufumi Iryu [Opens in a new window]
Yoko Saito-Kokubu*
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Jorinji, Izumi-cho, Toki, Gifu 509-5102, Japan
Takehiro Mitsuguchi
Affiliation:
Institute for Asian PaleoClimate, Ooma Akadoji-cho, Konan, Aichi 483-8226, Japan
Takahiro Watanabe
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Jorinji, Izumi-cho, Toki, Gifu 509-5102, Japan
Tsutomu Yamada
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aobayama, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
Ryuji Asami
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aobayama, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
Yasufumi Iryu
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aobayama, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: kokubu.yoko@jaea.go.jp.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We conducted a preliminary test of the coupled system of an elemental analyzer and the automated graphitization equipment Ionplus AGE3 (EA-AGE3 method) for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS 14C) measurements of CaCO3 samples, by comparing with the conventional method where the samples are hydrolyzed in phosphoric acid and resulting CO2 gas is manually graphitized in a vacuum line (HPA method). The samples used in the test were the IAEA C2 travertine, fossil and modern corals from the Ryukyu Islands and the Ogasawara Islands, respectively (both are located in the northwestern subtropical Pacific). Results indicate that, relative to the HPA method, the EA-AGE3 method tends to cause an increase of ~0.4–0.5 pMC with more widely scattered data. This is presumably due to 14C contamination in the EA (the most likely cause seems to be a memory effect of 14C); this effect could be reduced by careful optimization of conditions and procedures in the EA process. The 14C data of pre-bomb annual bands (1931–1949 AD) in the modern Ogasawara coral obtained by the HPA method were used to estimate the marine reservoir 14C-age correction (ΔR) of this region; it ranges from –109 yr to –28 yr with the mean value with standard deviation of –81 ± 29 yr.

Keywords

14CCaCO3EA-AGE3marine reservoir correction
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 61 , Issue 5: Radiocarbon 2018 Conference Proceedings Trondheim, Norway, June 17–22, 2018 Part 1 of 2 , October 2019 , pp. 1593 - 1601
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 23rd International Radiocarbon Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17–22 June, 2018

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, AH, Siciliano, D, Potts, DC, DeMartini, EE, Covarrubias, S. 2016a. Bomb radiocarbon and the Hawaiian Archipelago: coral, otoliths, and seawater. Radiocarbon 58(3):531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, AH, Asami, R, Iryu, Y, Kobayashi, DR, Camacho, F. 2016b. Bomb-produced radiocarbon in the western tropical Pacific Ocean: Guam coral reveals operation-specific signals from the Pacific Proving Grounds. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121:6351–6366.Google Scholar
Bonjean, F, Lagerloef, GSE. 2002. Diagnostic model and analysis of the surface currents in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography 32:2938–2954.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cersoy, S, Zazzo, A, Rofes, J, Tresset, A, Zirah, S, Gauthier, C, Kaltnecker, E, Thil, F, Tisnerat-Laborde, N. 2017. Radiocarbon dating minute amounts of bone (3–60 mg) with ECHoMICADAS. Scientific Reports 7(1):7141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07645-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druffel, ERM. 1987. Bomb radiocarbon in the Pacific: Annual and seasonal timescale variations. Journal of Marine Research 45:667–98.10.1357/002224087788326876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Griffin, S, Guilderson, TP, Kashgarian, M, Southon, J, Schrag, DP. 2001. Changes of subtropical north Pacific radiocarbon and correlation with climate variability. Radiocarbon 43(1):15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fewlass, H, Talamo, S, Tuna, T, Fagault, Y, Kromer, B, Hoffmann, H, Pangrazzi, C, Hublin, JJ, Bard, E. 2018. Size matters: radiocarbon dates of <200 µg ancient collagen samples with AixMICADAS and its gas ion source. Radiocarbon 60(2):425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, AR, McNichol, AP, Donoghue, JC, Stuart, DR, von Reden, K, NOSAMS. 2000. The NOSAMS sample preparation laboratory in the next millennium: progress after the WOCE program. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):409–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirabayashi, S, Yokoyama, Y, Suzuki, A, Miyairi, Y, Aze, T. 2017a. Short-term fluctuations in regional radiocarbon reservoir age recorded in coral skeletons from the Ryukyu Islands in the north-western Pacific. Journal of Quaternary Science 32(1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirabayashi, S, Yokoyama, Y, Suzuki, A, Miyairi, Y, Aze, T. 2017b. Multidecadal oceanographic changes in the western Pacific detected through high-resolution bomb-derived radiocarbon measurements on corals. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 18(4):1608–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, K, Tanaka, T, Sakanoue, M. 1982. Secular variation of radiocarbon concentration in seawater: Sclerochronological approach. Proceedings of the Fourth International Coral Reef Symposium 1:181–5.Google Scholar
Mitsuguchi, T, Dang, PX, Kitagawa, H, Yoneda, M, Shibata, Y. 2007. Tropical South China Sea surface 14C record in an annually-banded coral. Radiocarbon 49(2):905–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Brown, TA, Reimer, RW. 2004. Discussion: reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46(3):1299–1304.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50, 000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito-Kokubu, Y, Matsubara, A, Miyake, M, Nishizawa, A, Ohwaki, Y, Nishio, T, Sanada, K, Hanaki, T. 2015. Progress on multi-nuclide AMS of JAEA-AMS-TONO. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sookdeo, A, Wacker, L, Fahrni, S, McIntyre, CP, Friedrich, M, Reinig, F, Nievergelt, D, Tegel, W, Kromer, B, Büntgen, U. 2017. Speed dating: a rapid way to determine the radiocarbon age of wood by EA-AMS. Radiocarbon 59(3):933–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southon, J, Kashgarian, M, Fontugne, M, Metivier, B, Yim, WWS. 2002. Marine reservoir corrections for the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia. Radiocarbon 44(1):167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, KE, Skog, G, Georgiadou, E, Genberg, J, Johansson, A. 2011. A guide to radiocarbon units and calculations. Internal Report: Division of Nuclear Physics, Department of Physics, Lund University. p. 1–17.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.10.1017/S0033822200003672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.10.1016/0168-583X(84)90529-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoneda, M, Shibata, Y, Tanaka, A, Uehiro, T, Morita, M, Uchida, M, Kobayashi, T, Kobayashi, C, Suzuki, R, Miyamoto, K, Hancock, B, Dibden, C, Edmonds, JS. 2004. AMS 14C measurement and preparative techniques at NIES-TERRA. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoneda, M, Uno, H, Shibata, Y, Suzuki, R, Kumamoto, Y, Yoshida, K, Sasaki, T, Suzuki, A, Kawahata, H. 2007. Radiocarbon marine reservoir ages in the western Pacific estimated by pre-bomb molluscan shells. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:432–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010. A revolutionary graphitization system: fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:931–934.10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.067CrossRefGoogle Scholar