Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T05:39:33.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reassessing Human Settlement on the South Coast of San Miguel Island, California: The Use of 14C Dating as a Reconnaissance Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Todd J Braje*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1218, USA.
Jon M Erlandson
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1218, USA. Email: jerland@uoregon.edu
Torben C Rick
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275-0336, USA. Email: trick@smu.edu
*
Corresponding author. Email: tbraje@uoregon.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

California's San Miguel Island contains over 600 archaeological sites, some occupied as early as 12,000 yr ago and most located along the island's north coast. Archaeologists have long believed the south coast to have been marginal or largely uninhabited. Burial of some landforms by sand dunes deposited after historical overgrazing, the lack of systematic survey, and a dearth of radiocarbon dating have also contributed to an underestimation of the intensity of human land use along the south coast of San Miguel Island. Our recent reconnaissance and dating of shell middens on the island's south coast indicate more intensive occupation than previously thought, with numerous south coast sites spanning at least the past 9000 yr, and demonstrate the utility of combining systematic archaeological reconnaissance and radiometrics in reconstructions of human settlement and historical ecology in coastal environments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arnold, JE. 1992. Complex hunter-gatherer-fishers of prehistoric California: chiefs, specialists, and maritime adaptations of the Channel Islands. American Antiquity 57(1):6084.Google Scholar
Arnold, JE. 2000. The origins of hierarchy and the nature of hierarchical structures in prehistoric California. In: Hierarchies in Action: Cui Bono? Carbondale, California: Center for Archaeological Investigations. p 221–40.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM. 2001. The search for early shell middens on San Miguel Island, California. Unpublished report submitted to The Foundation for the Exploration and Research on Cultural Origins and Channel Islands National Park.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Bartoy, K. 1995. Cabrillo, the Chumash, and Old World diseases. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 17(2):153–73.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Kennett, DJ, Ingram, BL, Guthrie, DA, Morris, DP, Tveskov, MA, West, GJ, Walker, PL. 1996. An archaeological and paleontological chronology for Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261), San Miguel Island, California. Radiocarbon 38(2):355–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Moss, ML. 1996. The Pleistocene-Holocene transition along the Pacific Coast of North America. In: Straus, L, Eriksen, B, Erlandson, J, Yesner, D, editors. Humans at the End of the Ice Age: The Archaeology of the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition. New York: Plenum. p 277302.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Moss, ML. 1999. The systematic use of radiocarbon dating in archaeological surveys in coastal and other erosional environments. American Antiquity 64(3):431–43.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Rick, TC, Kennett, DJ, Walker, PL. 2001. Dates, demography, and disease: cultural contacts and possible evidence for Old World epidemics among the Island Chumash. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 37(3):1126.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Rick, TC, Vellanoweth, RL. 2004. Human impacts on ancient environments: a case study from California's Northern Channel Islands. In: Fitzpatrick, SM, editor. Voyages of Discovery: The Archaeology of Islands. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. p 5183.Google Scholar
Erlandson, JM, Rick, TC, Estes, JA, Graham, MH, Braje, TJ, Vellanoweth, RL. Forthcoming. Sea otters, shellfish, and humans: a 10,000-year record from San Miguel Island, California. In: Garcelon, D, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth California Islands Conference.Google Scholar
Glassow, MA. 1980. Recent developments in the archaeology of the Channel Islands. In: Power, DM, editor. Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 7999.Google Scholar
Greenwood, RS. 1978. Archaeological survey and investigation: Channel Islands National Monument, California. Volumes I and II [manuscript on file]. Santa Barbara: Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Greenwood, RS. 1982. Archaeological survey on San Miguel Island Channel Islands National Monument California. Volumes I and II [report on file at the Central Coast Information Center]. Santa Barbara: Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Heye, G. 1921. Certain artifacts from San Miguel Island, California. Indian Notes and Monographs 7(4):1211. New York: Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation.Google Scholar
Johnson, DL. 1980. Episodic vegetation stripping, soil erosion, and landscape modification in prehistoric and recent historic time, San Miguel Island, California. In: Power, DM, editor. The California Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 103–21.Google Scholar
Johnson, JR, Stafford, TW Jr, Ajie, HO, Morris, DP. 2000. Arlington Springs revisited. In: Browne, D, Mitchell, K, Chaney, H, editors. Proceedings of the Fifth California Channel Islands Symposium. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 628–32Google Scholar
Juger, A, Johnson, DL. 1980. Was there a Quaternary land bridge to the Northern Channel Islands? In: Power, DM, editor. The California Islands Symposium: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 33–9.Google Scholar
Kennett, DJ. 1998. Behavioral ecology and the evolution of hunter-gatherer societies on the Northern Channel Islands, California [PhD dissertation]. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Kennett, DJ. Forthcoming. The Island Chumash: Behavioral Ecology of a Maritime Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. 310 p.Google Scholar
King, CD. 1990. Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used for Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before AD 1804. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Orr, PC. 1968. Prehistory of Santa Rosa Island. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Rick, TC. 2004. Daily activities, community dynamics, and historical ecology on California's Northern Channel Islands [PhD dissertation]. Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Rick, TC, Erlandson, JM. 2003. Archaeology, ancient human impacts on the environment, and cultural resource management on Channel Islands National Park, California. CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship 1(1):86–9.Google Scholar
Rick, TC, Erlandson, JM. 2004. Archaeological site assessments on San Miguel and Santa Rosa Islands, Channel Islands National Park, California. Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon. Report submitted to Channel Islands National Park.Google Scholar
Rogers, DB. 1929. Prehistoric Man on the Santa Barbara Coast. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Rozaire, CE. 1978. Archaeological Investigations on San Miguel Island, California. Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Walker, PL, Kennett, DJ, Jones, TL, DeLong, R. 2000. Archaeological investigations at the Point Bennett Pinniped Rookery on San Miguel Island. In: Browne, D, Mitchell, K, Chaney, H, editors. Proceedings of the Fifth California Channel Islands Symposium. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 628–32.Google Scholar