Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:57:42.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scintillation Counter Performance at the SMU Radiocarbon Laboratory∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

James M Devine  and
Herbert Haas
James M Devine
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Southern Methodist University Dallas, Texas 75275
Herbert Haas
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Southern Methodist University Dallas, Texas 75275
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results are presented of a study of counter performance and vial characteristics for three liquid scintillation counters used at the SMU Radiocarbon Laboratory: the Intertechnique LS20, Packard Tri-Carb 460C, and LKB Wallac Rack Beta 1217. Modifications to photomultiplier tube high voltage, pre-amplifier gain, energy window settings, counting vial design, and sample holder design have resulted in reduced background, higher counting efficiency, and greater long-term stability for the Intertechnique and Packard counters. Square quartz counting vials are used in the Intertechnique and Packard counters with excellent results. Use of Teflon vials in the LKB counter requires careful cleaning procedures and long counting times.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , 1987 , pp. 12 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Baillie, L A, 1960, Determination of liquid scintillation counting efficiency by pulse height shift: Internatl Jour Appl Radiation Isotopes, v 8, p 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, D and Polach, H, 1983, Effects of vial holder materials and design on low-level C14 scintillation counting, in McQuarrie, S A, Ediss, C, and Wiebe, L I, eds, Advances in scintillation counting: Edmonton, Univ Alberta Press, p 468–477.Google Scholar
Gupta, S K and Polach, H, Radiocarbon dating practices at ANU: Research School Pacific Studies, ANU, Canberra, 173 p.Google Scholar
Haas, H. 1979, Specific problems with liquid scintillation counting of small benzene volumes and background count estimation, in Berger, R and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl 14C conf, 9th, Proc: Berkeley, Univ California Press, p 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polach, H, Nurmi, J, Kojola, H, and Soini, E, 1983a, Electronic optimisation of scintillation counters for detection of low-level H3 and C14 , in McQuarrie, S A, Ediss, C, and Wiebe, L A, eds, Advances in scintillation counting: Edmonton, Univ Alberta Press, p 420–441.Google Scholar
Polach, H, Robertson, S, Butterfield, D and Gower, J, 1983b, The “windowless” approach to scintillation counting: low-level C14 as an example, in McQuarrie, S A, Ediss, C, and Wiebe, L I, eds, Advances in scintillation counting: Edmonton, Univ Alberta Press, p 494–507.Google Scholar
Soini, E, 1975, Rejection of optical crosstalk in photomultiplier tubes in liquid scintillation counters: Wallac rept, Turku, Finland, 9 p.Google Scholar