Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-gfk6d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-30T12:28:05.721Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

UCLA Radiocarbon Dates IV∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Rainer Berger ,
G. J. Fergusson  and
W. F. Libby
Rainer Berger
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles 24, California
G. J. Fergusson*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles 24, California
W. F. Libby
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles 24, California
*
∗∗Present address: Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The measurements reported in this list have been carried out in the Isotope Laboratory of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics during 1964. They are a continuation of the previously reported date lists UCLA I, II and III. The same counting procedure has been continued: CO2 proportional counting at 1 atm of pressure in a 7.5 L counter with three energy channels. Dates have been calculated according to the recommendations of the Fifth Radiocarbon Conference, Cambridge, 1962, on the basis of a radiocarbon half-life of 5568 yr (Godwin, 1962). The modern standard for organic samples has been based on 95% of the count rate of NBS oxalic acid for radiocarbon laboratories. Background measurements are determined with CO2 derived from marble. The ages of carbonate-containing substances such as shells and tufa have been calculated on the basis of estimates for the corresponding contemporary C14 activity (Broecker and Walton, 1959), as discussed in the respective sample descriptions. New methods of sample preparation are described in context with the date listings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 7 , 1965 , pp. 336 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

Footnotes

∗

Publication number 407. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles.

References

Agrawal, D. P., Kusumgar, S., Lal, D., and Sarna, R. P., 1964, Tata Institute radiocarbon date list II: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 226–232.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Horney, A. G., and Libby, W. F., 1964, Radiocarbon dating of bone and shell from their organic components: Science, v. 144, p. 999–1001.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Kulp, J. L., 1957, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Science, v. 126, p. 1324–1334.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Walton, A., 1959, The geochemistry of C14 in the fresh water systems: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 16, p. 15.Google Scholar
Collier, D., 1962, Archaeological investigations in the Casma Valley, Peru: Akten des 34. Internationalen Amerikanistenkongresses, Vienna, Austria, p. 411–417.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., 1964, The nature of charcoal excavated at archeological sites: Am. Antiquity, v. 29, p. 514–517.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1958a, Univ. of Michigan radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 127, p. 1098–1105.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B. 1958b, Univ. of Michigan radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128, p. 1117–1123.Google Scholar
Damon, Paul E., Long, , Austin, and Sigalove, Joel J., 1963, Arizona radiocarbon dates IV: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 283–301.Google Scholar
Drucker, P., Heizer, R. F., and Squier, R. J., 1957, Radiocarbon dates from La Venta, Tabasco: Science, v. 126, p. 72–73.Google Scholar
Drucker, P., Heizer, R. F., and Squier, R. J. 1959, Excavations at La Venta, Tabasco, 1955: Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 170.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. F., 1963a, Upper tropospheric carbon-14 levels during spring 1962: Jour. Geophys. Research, v. 68, p. 3933–3941.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. F. 1963b, High-volume sampler for atmospheric carbon dioxide: Review of Sci. Instruments, v. 34, p. 403–406.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. F., and Libby, W. F., 1962, UCLA radiocarbon dates I: Radiocarbon, v. 4. p. 109–114.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. F., and Libby, W. F. 1963, UCLA radiocarbon dates II: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 1–22.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. F., and Libby, W. F. 1964, UCLA radiocarbon dates III: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 318–339.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H., 1959, The royal canon of Turin: Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. 1961, Egypt of the pharaons: Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., 1962, Half-life of radiocarbon: Nature, v. 195, p. 984.Google Scholar
Hayes, W. C., 1962, Chronology: Egypt—to the end of twentieth dynasty. A fascicle of the Cambridge Ancient History in process of being revised: Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, Edwards, I. E. S., Gadd, C. J., and Hammond, N. G. L., general ed., p. 1–23.Google Scholar
Horn, W., 1957, On the origins of the mediaeval bay system: Jour. of Society of Architectural Historians, v. 17, p. 12 and note 37.Google Scholar
Horn, W. 1962, Two timber mediaeval churches from Cheshire, England: Art Bulletin. v. 44, p. 263–278.Google Scholar
Horn, W., and Born, E., 1964, The barns of the Abbey of Beaulieu: at its Granges of Grent Coxwell and Beaulieu-St. Leonards: Berkeley-Los Angeles, Univ. of Calif. Press, p. 1–84.Google Scholar
Hubbs, C. L., Bien, G. S., and Suess, H. E., 1965, La Jolla natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Radiocarbon, v. 7, p. 66–117.Google Scholar
Krinov, E. L., 1963, The Tunguska and Sikhote-Alin Meteorites in The Moon, Meteorites and Comets, Middlehurst, B. M. and Kuiper, G. P., editors: The Solar System (Chicago), v. 4, p. 208–234.Google Scholar
Lauer, J.-P., 1961, Les Pyramides de Sakkarah: Cairo, L'Institute Graphique Egyptien, p. 12.Google Scholar
Lauer, J.-P. 1962, Histoire Monumentale des Pyramides d'Égypte, Vol. I (text), Les Pyramides à Degrés (IIIe Dynastie) : Institut Francaise d'Archéologie Orientale. Bibliothéque d'Étude, T. XXXIX (Cairo).Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1955, Radiocarbon Dating: Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., Berger, R., Mead, J. F., Alexander, G. V., and Ross, J. F., 1964, Replacement rates for human tissue from atmospheric radiocarbon: Science, v. 146 p. 1170–1172.Google Scholar
Long, Austin, 1965, Smithsonian Institution radiocarbon measurements II: Radiocarbon, v. 7, p. 245–256.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Southwest Museum, 1951, Five prehistoric sites in Los Angeles County, California.Google Scholar
Ogden, J. Gordon III, and Hay, Ruth J., 1964, Ohio Wesleyan University natural radiocarbon measurements I: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 340–348.Google Scholar
Orr, P. C., 1957, On the occurrence and nature of Amberat: Observations (WSI), no. 2, p. 1–3.Google Scholar
Petrie, , Flinders, W. M., 1914, Tarkhan II: British School of Archeol. in Egypt (London), p. 6.Google Scholar
Porcella, A., and Porcella, T., 1963, Masterpieces of European Art: Exhibition at Tallyho. Las Vegas, Nevada, p. 236.Google Scholar
Prufer, O. H., 1963, Der Hopewell-Komplex der östlichen Vereinigten Staaten: Paideuma. v. 9, p. 122–147.Google Scholar
Robins, P. A., and Swart, E. R., 1964, Southern Rhodesian radiocarbon measurements I: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 31–36.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W., Lange, A. L., and de Saussure, R., 1958, Split-twig figurines in the Grand Canyon: Am. Antiquity, v. 23, p. 264–274.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. C., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1964, Groningen radiocarbon dates V: Radiocarbon. v. 6, p. 349–369.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V., and Jorgensen, C. D., 1964, Pleistocene wood rat middens and climatic change in Mohave Desert: a record of juniper woodlands: Science, v. 143, p. 1171–1174.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. J., 1930, The great Siberian meteor and the waves, seismic and aerial, which it produced: Quart. Jour. Royal Meteorol. Soc., v. 56, p. 287–304.Google Scholar
Wise, E. N., and Shutler, D. Jr., 1958, University of Arizona radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 127, p. 72–74.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1921, A new cave man from Rhodesia, South Africa: Nature, v. 108, p. 371.Google Scholar