Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-wnbrb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-23T06:08:26.759Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

UCLA Radiocarbon Dates VI*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Rainer Berger
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California Los Angeles 90024
W. F. Libby
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California Los Angeles 90024
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The measurements reported have been carried out during 1966 in the Isotope Laboratory of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics as a continuation of the UCLA date lists I through V. Samples were analyzed as CO2-gas at one atm in a 7.5 L proportional counter with three energy channels. The all-solid-state unit is supplied with high voltage from a remarkably stable and interference-free battery source. Radiocarbon ages have been calculated on the basis of a 5568-yr half-life as was recommended by the Sixth International C14 and H3 Dating Conference, June 1965, in Pullman, Washington. The standard for the contemporary biosphere remains as 95% of the count rate of NBS oxalic acid for radiocarbon laboratories. Background determinations have been based on CO2 obtained from marble. The error listed is always at least a one-sigma statistical counting error. In critical cases C13/C12 isotope ratio measurements were made to correct the dates. All samples were subjected to accepted pretreatments differing in the individual cases to exclude contamination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science

Footnotes

*

Publication number 561, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles.

References

Barker, H. and Mackey, C. J., 1959, British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements I: Radiocarbon, v. 1, p. 81.Google Scholar
Barker, H. and Mackey, C. J., 1961, British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements III: Radiocarbon, v. 3, p. 39.Google Scholar
Bartlett, A., 1967, Chronological studies of the Gatun Basin of Panama: a history of vegetation, climate and sealevel changes during the last 12,0000 yr.: Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
Baumhoff, M. A. and Heizer, R. F., 1965, Postglacial climate and archaeology in the desert west; in Postglacial climate and archaeology in the desert west;. Wright, H. E. and Frey, D. G.: Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, p. 697.Google Scholar
Bell, B., 1968, The archaeology of Nayarit, Jalisco and Colima; in Handbook of Middle American Indians, general ed. Wauchope, R.: Austin, Univ. of Texas Press, in press.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Fergusson, G. J., and Libby, W. F., 1965, UCLA radiocarbon dates IV: Radiocarbon, v. 7, p. 336.Google Scholar
Berger, R. and Horn, W., 1967, The construction date of the barns of Cressing Temple, Essex, in the light of radiocarbon analysis: Jour. Soc. Architectural Historians, in press.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Horney, A. G., and Libby, W. F., 1964, Radiocarbon dating of bone and shell from their organic components: Science, v. 144, p. 999.Google Scholar
Berger, R. and Libby, W. F., 1966, UCLA radiocarbon dates V: Radiocarbon, v. 8, p. 467.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Libby, W. F., Alexander, G. V., Mead, J. F., and Ross, J. F., 1966, Atmospheric bomb radiocarbon as a tracer in human beings; in Atmospheric bomb radiocarbon as a tracer in human beings;. Rothchild, S.: New York, Plenum Press, p. 321.Google Scholar
Berger, R., Taylor, R. E., and Libby, W. F., 1966, Radiocarbon content of marine shells from the California and Mexican west coast: Science, v. 153, p. 864.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. and Griffin, J. B., 1963, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates VIII: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 228.Google Scholar
Damon, P E., Haynes, C. V., and Long, A., 1964, Arizona radiocarbon dates V: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 91.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A., and Grey, D. C., 1966, Fluctuation of atmospheric carbon-14 during the last six millenia: Jour. Geophys. Res., v. 71, p. 1055.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A., and Sigalove, J. J., 1963, Arizona radiocarbon dates IV: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 283.10.1017/S0033822200036900Google Scholar
DeVries, H., 1958, Variations in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth: Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Prodc. B61, p. 94.Google Scholar
DeVries, H. and Barendsen, G. W., 1958, Groningen radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128, p. 1550.Google Scholar
Ekholm, G. F., 1942, Excavations at Guasave, Sinoloa, Mexico: Anthropological Papers of Am. Mus. of Nat. History, v. 38, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. J. and Libby, W. F., 1962, UCLA radiocarbon dates I: Radiocarbon, v. 4, p. 109.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. J. and Libby, W. F., 1963, UCLA radiocarbon dates II: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 1.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. J. and Libby, W. F., 1964, UCLA radiocarbon dates III: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 318.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. R., 1962, Nuevas fechas de la cronologia arqueologica Argentina obtenidas por el metodo de radiocarbon: Revista del Instituto de Antropologia. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba, v. 1, p. 303.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. R., 1966, Paper presented at 37th Internat. Cong. of Americanists, La Plata, Agentina.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R., 1933, Gypsum Ceva, Nevada: Southwest Mus. Papers, no. 8.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R., 1957, A Pinto site at Little Lake, California: Southwest Mus. Papers, no. 17.Google Scholar
Hayes, W. C., 1962, Egypt—to the end of twentieth dynasty; in Egypt—to the end of twentieth dynasty;. Hayes, C., Rowton, M. B. and Stubbings, F. H., Chronology: Cambridge Ancient History Fascicles: Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, general eds. Edwards, I. E. S., Gadd, C. J. and Hammond, N. G. L., p. 123.Google Scholar
Haynes, C. V., Damon, P. E., and Grey, D. C., 1966, Arizona radiocarbon dates VI: Radiocarbon, v. 8, p. 1.10.1017/S0033822200000011Google Scholar
Helck, W., 1956, Untersuchungen zu Manetho und den ägyptischen Königslisten: Berlin, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Horn, W., Born, E., and Berger, R., 1967, A victim of fire: the 15th century manor barn of Nettlestead, Kent: Aachener Kunstblätter, in press.Google Scholar
Horn, W., Charles, F. W. B., and Berger, R., 1966, The cruck-built barn of Middle Littleton, Worcestershire: Jour. Soc. Architectural Historians, v. 25, p. 221.Google Scholar
Kaplan, I. R. and Nissenbaum, A., 1966, Anomalous carbon-isotope ratios in nonvolatile organic material: Science, v. 153, p. 744.Google Scholar
Kigoshi, K. and Hasegawa, H., 1965, Secular variations of atmospheric radiocarbon concentration and its dependence on geomagnetism: Jour. Geophys. Res., v. 71, p. 1065.Google Scholar
La Marche, V. C. and Moonev, H. A., 1967, Altithermal timberline advance in Western United States: Nature, v. 213, p. 980.Google Scholar
Lanning, E. P., 1963, Archaeology of the Rose Spring Site, Iny-372: Univ. of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, v. 49, no. 3, p. 237.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1955. Radiocarbon dating: Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press. New Paperback edition with notes added, 1965.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1963, Accuracy of radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 140, p. 278.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., Berger, R., Mead, J. F., Alexander, G. V., and Ross, J. F., 1964, Replacement rates for human tissues from atmospheric radiocarbon: Science, v. 146, p. 1170.Google Scholar
Lingenfelter, R. E., 1963, Production of carbon-14 by cosmic- ray neutrons: Revs. Geophys., v. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Long, S. V., 1966, An application of the direct historical approach to West Mexican archaeology: Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Long, S. V. and Taylor, R. E., 1966, Chronology of a West Mexican shaft-tomb: Nature, v. 212, p. 651.Google Scholar
Long, S. V. and Taylor, R. E., 1966, Suggested revision for West Mexican archaeological sequences: Science, v. 154, p. 1456.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. B. and Berger, R., 1966, Two Aztec wood idols: Manuscript on file, Inst. of Geophysics and Dept. of Anthropology, UCLA.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, A. and Kaplan, I. R., 1967, Origin of the Beeri (Israel) sulfur deposit: Chemical Geology, v. 1, p. 295.Google Scholar
Olsson, I., 1959, Uppsala natural radiocarbon measurements I: Radiocarbon, v. 1, p. 87.Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K., 1959, University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates III: Radiocarbon, v. 1, p. 45.Google Scholar
Smith, H. S., 1964, Egypt and C14 dating: Am. Antiquity, v. 38, p. 32.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., 1961, Variations in radiocarbon concentration and sunspot activity: Jour. Geophys. Res., v. 66, p. 273.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., 1965, Carbon-14 content of 18th and 19th century wood: variations correlated with sunspot activity: Science, v. 149, p. 533.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Suess, H. E., 1966, On the relationship between radiocarbon dates and true sample ages: Radiocarbon, v. 8, p. 534.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E., 1965, Secular variations of the cosmic-ray-produced carbon-14 in the atmosphere and their interpretations: Jour. Geophys. Res., v. 70, p. 5937.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E. and Berger, R., 1967. Radiocarbon dates from Tizapan El Alto, Jalisco: in Excavations at Tizapan, Meighan, C. W. and Foote, L.: monograph, in press.Google Scholar
Tubbs, D. Y. and Berger, R., 1967, The viability of pathogens in ancient human coprolites: Univ. of California, Berkeley, Archaeol. Survey report No. 70.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V., 1966, Late Pleistocene vegetation and degree of pluvial climate change in the Chihuahuan desert: Science, v. 153, p. 970.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V. and Berger, R., 1967, Late Pleistocene history of woodland vegetation in the Mohave desert: Science, v. 155, p. 1640.Google Scholar
Willis, E. H., Tauber, T., and Münnich, K. O., 1960, Variations in the atmospheric radiocarbon concentration over the past 1300 years: Radiocarbon, v. 2, p. 1.Google Scholar
Wood, L. and Libby, W. F., 1964, Geophysical implications of radiocarbon date discrepancies; in Geophysical implications of radiocarbon date discrepancies;. Craig, Miller and Wasserberg: Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co., p. 205.Google Scholar