Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:18:36.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Verification of the Cosmic-Ray Event in AD 993–994 by Using a Japanese Hinoki Tree

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

Fusa Miyake*
Affiliation:
Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Kimiaki Masuda
Affiliation:
Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Masataka Hakozaki
Affiliation:
Center for Chronological Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Toshio Nakamura
Affiliation:
Center for Chronological Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Fuyuki Tokanai
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
Kazuhiro Kato
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
Katsuhiko Kimura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Symbiotic Systems Science, Fukushima University, Fukushima, Japan
Takumi Mitsutani
Affiliation:
National Institutes for Cultural Heritage, Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Nara, Japan
*
2. Corresponding author. Email: fmiyake@stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp.

Abstract

A rapid yearly increase in the radiocarbon content has been detected for the period from AD 993 to 994. However, this event is supported by the 14C measurements of only one cedar tree sample, and verification is necessary to confirm this event more reliably. For this purpose, this study measured the 14C content in Japanese Hinoki tree rings corresponding to the period from AD 988 to 997 using the accelerator mass spectrometry system at Yamagata University (YU-AMS). The result shows a significant 14C increase from AD 993 to 994, and is consistent with the previously measured data for the Japanese cedar tree. This marks the second case detecting an increased 14C level corresponding to the AD 994 event.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baillie, MGL, Pilcher, JR. 1973. A simple crossdating program for tree-ring research. Tree-Ring Bulletin 33:714.Google Scholar
Burr, GS. 2007. Radiocarbon dating: causes of temporal variations. In: Elias, S, editor. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 2931–41.Google Scholar
Güttler, D, Beer, J, Bleicher, N, Boswijk, G, Hogg, AG, Palmer, JG, Vockenhuber, C, Wacker, L, Wunder, J. 2013. Worldwide detection of a rapid increase of cosmogenic 14C in AD 775. Poster presented at the Nuclear Physics in Astrophysics VI conference, 19–24 May 2013, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Jull, AJT, Panyushkina, IP, Lange, TE, Kukarskih, VV, Myglan, VS, Clark, KJ, Salzer, MW, Burr, GS, Leavitt, SW. 2014. Excursions in the 14C record at A.D. 774–775 in tree rings from Russia and America. Geophysical Research Letters 41(8):3004–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, F, Nagaya, K, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2012. A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774–775 from tree rings in Japan. Nature 486(7402):240–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, F, Masuda, K, Nakamura, T. 2013. Another rapid event in the carbon-14 content of tree rings. Nature Commununications 4:1748, doi:10.1038/ncomms2873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, T, Masuda, K, Miyake, F, Nagaya, K, Yoshimitsu, T. 2013. Radiocarbon ages of annual rings from Japanese wood: evident age offset based on IntCal09. Radiocarbon 55(2):763–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, KB, Mikaloff-Fletcher, SE, Bianchi, D, Beaulieu, C, Galbraith, ED, Gnanadesikan, A, Hogg, AG, ludicone, D, Lintner, BR, Naegler, T, Reimer, PJ, Sarmiento, JL, Slater, RD. 2011. Interhemispheric gradient of atmospheric radiocarbon reveals natural variability of Southern Ocean winds. Climate of the Past 7:1123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokanai, F, Kato, K, Anshita, M, Sakurai, H, Izumi, A, Toyoguchi, T, Kobayashi, T, Miyahara, H, Ohyama, M, Hoshino, Y. 2013. Present status of YU-AMS system. Radiocarbon 55(2):251–9.Google Scholar
Usoskin, IG, Kovaltsov, GA. 2012. Occurrence of extreme solar particle events: assessment from historical proxy data. The Astrophysical Journal 757:92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usoskin, IG, Kromer, B, Ludlow, F, Beer, J, Friedrich, M, Kovaltsov, GA, Solanki, SK, Wacker, L. 2013. The AD775 cosmic event revisited: the Sun is to blame. Astronomy & Astrophysics 552: L3, doi:10.1051/0004–6361/201321080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar