Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:23:33.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Induction of oxidative stress related responses in Arabidopsis thaliana following uranium exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2009

N. Vanhoudt
Affiliation:
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Biosphere Impact Studies, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium Hasselt University, Environmental Biology, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
H. Vandenhove
Affiliation:
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Biosphere Impact Studies, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
K. Opdenakker
Affiliation:
Hasselt University, Environmental Biology, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
T. Remans
Affiliation:
Hasselt University, Environmental Biology, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
K. Smeets
Affiliation:
Hasselt University, Environmental Biology, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
D. Martinez Bello
Affiliation:
Hasselt University, Statcom, Censtat, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
M. Van Hees
Affiliation:
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Biosphere Impact Studies, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
J. Wannijn
Affiliation:
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Biosphere Impact Studies, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
J. Vangronsveld
Affiliation:
Hasselt University, Environmental Biology, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
A. Cuypers
Affiliation:
Hasselt University, Environmental Biology, Agoralaan Building D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The reactive oxygen species (ROS)-signaling pathway is very important in heavy metal toxicity. Induction of the antioxidative defense mechanism, comprising ROS-scavenging enzymes and metabolites, in plants after environmental uranium contamination has been insufficiently studied in the past. This study aimed to analyze oxidative stress related responses in Arabidopsis thaliana after uranium exposure. Seventeen-day-old seedlings were exposed to 0, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM uranium for 3 days. After exposure to 100 μM uranium, a decrease in fresh weight for leaves and roots was observed, leaves colored anthocyanous and roots were stunted and yellow. To reveal the importance of oxidative stress in uranium toxicity, alterations in ROS-scavenging enzymes were studied at protein and transcriptional level. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) capacities increased in leaves and roots after exposure to 100 μM uranium but no differences were observed for catalase (CAT) capacities. Transcript levels of different SODs located at various cellular compartments were affected depending on the place of action. Gene expression of CAT in leaves and roots was also affected after uranium exposure. Results indicate that oxidative stress plays an important role in uranium toxicity but suggest that plant responses differ for leaves and roots.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

H. Vandenhove, International Congress Series 1225 (2002) 307–315.
D. Ribera, F. Labrot, G. Tisnerat and J.F. Narbonne, Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 146 (1996) 53–89.
R. Mittler, S. Vanderauwera, M. Gollery and F. Van Breusegem, Trends in Plant Science 9 (2004) 1360–1385.
A. Arora, R. Sairam and G. Srivastava, Current Science 82 (2002) 1227–1238.
H. Vandenhove, A. Cuypers, M. Van Hees, G. Koppen and J. Wannijn, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 44 (2006) 795–805.
K. Smeets, A. Cuypers, A. Lambrechts, B. Semane, P. Hoet, A. Van Laere and J. Vangronsveld, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 43 (2005) 437–444.
A. Cuypers, J. Vangronsveld and H. Clijsters, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 39 (2001) 657–664. CrossRef
H. Bergmeyer, K. Gawehn and M. Grassl, in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, edited by H. Bergmeyer (Academic Press, New York, 1974).
J. McCord and I. Fridovich, Journal of Biological Chemistry 244 (1969) 6049–6055.
J. Vandesompele, K. De Preter, F. Pattyn, B. Poppe, N. Van Roy, A. De Paepe and F. Speleman, Genome Biology 3 (2002) research 0034.
E. Lehmann and H. D'Abrera, in Nonparametrics, Statistical Methods based on Ranks (Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1998).
M. Kutner, C. Nachtsheim, J. Neter and W. Li, in Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5th edn. (Boston, Massachusets, Mac Graw Hill, 2005).
R. Mittler, Trends in Plant Science 7 (2002) 405–410.
J. Weckx and H. Clijsters, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 35 (1997) 405–410.
J. Weckx and H. Clijsters, Physiologia Plantarum 96 (1996) 506–512.
H. Clijsters, A. Cuypers and J. Vangronsveld, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 54c (1999) 730–734.
R. Alscher, N. Erturk and L. Heath, Journal of Experimental Botany 53 (2002) 1331–1341. CrossRef