Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-hwk5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-09T22:43:24.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Normal forms for unary probabilistic automata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

Maria Paola Bianchi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Comelico 39, 20135 Milano, Italy. bianchi@di.unimi.it, pighizzini@di.unimi.it
Giovanni Pighizzini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Comelico 39, 20135 Milano, Italy. bianchi@di.unimi.it, pighizzini@di.unimi.it
Get access

Abstract

We investigate the possibility of extending Chrobak normal form to the probabilisticcase. While in the nondeterministic case a unary automaton can be simulated by anautomaton in Chrobak normal form without increasing the number of the states in thecycles, we show that in the probabilistic case the simulation is not possible by keepingthe same number of ergodic states. This negative result is proved by considering thenatural extension to the probabilistic case of Chrobak normal form, obtained by replacingnondeterministic choices with probabilistic choices. We then propose a different kind ofnormal form, namely, cyclic normal form, which does not suffer from the same problem: weprove that each unary probabilistic automaton can be simulated by a probabilisticautomaton in cyclic normal form, with at most the same number of ergodic states. In thenondeterministic case there are trivial simulations between Chrobak normal form and cyclicnormal form, preserving the total number of states in the automata and in theircycles.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bianchi, M.P., Mereghetti, C., Palano, B. and Pighizzini, G., On the size of unary probabilistic and nondeterministic automata. Fundamenta Informaticae 112 (2011) 119135. Google Scholar
Chrobak, M., Finite automata and unary languages, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 47 (1986) 149158; Erratum, Theoret. Comput. 302 (2003) 497–498. Google Scholar
Geffert, V., Magic numbers in the state hierarchy of finite automata. Inf. Comput. 205 (2001) 16521670. Google Scholar
G. Gramlich, Probabilistic and Nondeterministic Unary Automata, in Proc. of MFCS. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2757 (2003) 460–469. CrossRef
D.L. Isaacson and R.W. Madsen, Markov Chains Theory and Applications, edited by J. Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1976).
Jiang, T., Mcdowell, E. and Ravikumar, B., The structure and complexity of minimal nfa’s over a unary alphabet. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 2 (1991) 163182. Google Scholar
J. Kaneps, Regularity of One-Letter Languages Acceptable by 2-Way Finite Probabilistic Automata, in Proc of FCT. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 529 (1991) 287–296. CrossRef
Mereghetti, C. and Pighizzini, G., Optimal simulations between unary automata. SIAM J. Comput. 30 (2001) 19761992. Google Scholar
Mereghetti, C., Palano, B. and Pighizzini, G., Note on the succinctness of deterministic, nondeterministic, probabilistic and quantum finite automata. RAIRO–Theor. Inf. Appl. 5 (2001) 477490. Google Scholar
Milani, M. and Pighizzini, G., Tight bounds on the simulation of unary probabilistic automata by deterministic automata. J. Automata, Languages and Combinatorics 6 (2001) 481492. Google Scholar
A. Paz, Introduction to Probabilistic Automata. Academic Press, New York (1971).
Rabin, M., Probabilistic automata. Inf. Control 6 (1963) 230245. Google Scholar
E. Seneta, Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag (1981).
To, A.W., Unary finite automata vs. arithmetic progressions. Inf. Process. Lett. 109 (2009) 10101014. Google Scholar