Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-12T07:44:21.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Financial Fragility, Business Creation and Job Destruction*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Étienne Wasmer  and
Philippe Weil
Étienne Wasmer
Affiliation:
Université de Metz, ID2, ECARES, IZA and CEPR
Philippe Weil
Affiliation:
ECARES, VLB, IEP Paris, CEPR and NBER
Get access

Summary

We build a model of endogenous destruction with credit and labor marketimperfections, represented by a matching process between financiers andentrepreneurs on one hand, and entrepreneurs and workers on the other hand.Business creation, credit opening and job destruction represent three activemargins of the model. Financial imperfections lead to financial fragility.This implies the existence of a forth latent margin whichmay be activated in the case of repudiation of financial contracts. Thisparadigm is applied to the recent development of the U.S. economy. Anempirical test in panel of OECD countries further suggests the importance ofventure capital for macroeconomic variables.

Résumé

Résumé

Nous construisons un modèle de destruction endogènes d’emploi avec desimperfections sur le marché du crédit et du travail. Ces imperfections sontreprésentées par un processus d’appariement entre les banquiers et lesentrepreneurs d’une part, et entre les entrepreneurs et les salariés d’autrepart. La création d’entreprises, l’ouverture des crédits aux entreprises etla destruction des emplois constituent les trois marges actives du modèle.Les imperfections financières créent de la fragilité financière, ce quiimplique l’existence d’une quatrième marge à l’état de latence. Cette margepeut être activée lorsque les contrats financiers sont répudiés. Ceparadigme est appliqué aux dévelopements récents de l’économie américaine.Un test sur données de panel de l’OCDE suggère l’importance ducapital-risque pour les variables macro-économiques.

Keywords

Credit and Search FrictionsUnemploymentNew EconomyMonetary PolicyJ64G24E51Frictions de Credit et de ProspectionChômageNouvelle EconomicJ64G24E51

Information

Type
III. Finance
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 68 , Special Issue 1-2: The New Economy: Implications and Viability , 2002 , pp. 185 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This paper was prepared for the conference “New Economy, Viability and Implications”, Université de Metz, on April 27-28,2001. We thank the participants for their comments. We also thank Asa Rosen for her careful reading of the paper.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2000), “Credit Market Imperfections and Persistent Unemployment”, NBER Working Paper No. W7938.Google Scholar
Degryse, H. and Ongena, S. (2001), “Distance, Lending Relationships, and Competition”, mimeo, K.U. Leuven.Google Scholar
Easterly, W., Islam, R. and Stiglitz, J. (1999), “Shaken and Stirred: Volatility and Macroeconomic Paradigms for Rich and Poor Countries”, Michael Bruno Memorial Lecture, XIIth World Congress of the IEA, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Mortensen, D.T. and Pissarides, C.A. (1994), “Job Creation and Job Destruction in the Theory of Unemployment”, Review of Economic Studies, 64, 397–415.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. and Rajan, R. (2000), “Does distance still matters? The information revolution in small business lending”, NBER w.p. 7685, revised March 2001.Google Scholar
Pissarides, C.A. (1990), Equilibrium Unemployment Theory, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wasmer, E. and P. Weil (2001), “The Macroeconomics of Credit and Labor Market Frictions”, paper presented at the European Summer Symposium in International Macroeconomics, 1999, Lisbon, and IZA discussion paper 179 (Aug. 2000).Google Scholar