Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:53:34.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sport, War, and Contest in Shakespeare's Henry VI*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Gregory M. Colón Semenza*
Affiliation:
The University of Connecticut

Abstract

Whereas sport had been justified since antiquity for providing soldiers with the physical training they would require in battle, its utilitarian function waned with the English military's gradual adaptation of firearms during the Renaissance. As a result, sports were increasingly condemned as idle and superfluous phenomena — nothing more than futile competitions between men. In Shakespeare's Henry VI, sport figures as a metaphor for war itself, also condemnable as a result of the historical shift from the politics of chivalric idealism to the “politics of reality.” Throughout the trilogy, Shakespeare indicts modern warfare as mere sport for ambitious and corrupt nobles.

Type
Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1996. Politics. Ed. Stephen Everson. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Lodovico. 1974. Orlando Furioso. Trans. Guido Waldman. London and New York.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. 1904. English Works: Toxophilus, Report of the Affaires and State of Germany, The Scolemaster. Ed. William Aldis Wright. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ascham, Roger. 1904. Toxophilus. Ed. William Aldis Wright. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Helene Iswolsky. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Barish, Jonas. 1991. “War, Civil War, and Bruderkrieg in Shakespeare.” In Literature and Nationalism, ed. Vincent Newey and Ann Thompson, 11-21. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Berry, Edward. 1975. Patterns of Decay: Shakespeare's Early Histories. Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
Bevington, David. 1968. Tudor Drama and Politics: A Critical Approach to Topical Meaning. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Boris, Edna Zwick. 1978. Shakespeare's English Kings: The People and the Law. Rutherford, NJ.Google Scholar
Calderwood, James L. 1967. “Shakespeare's Evolving Imagery: 2Henry VI.” English Studies 48: 481–93.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lily B. 1963. Shakespeare's ‘Histories': Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy. San Marino, CA.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1994, reprint. The Civilizing Process. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Oxford.Google Scholar
Elyot, Sir Thomas. 1967. The Boke Named the Governour. Ed. Henry Herbert Stephen Croft. New York.Google Scholar
Fourquevaux. 1589. Instructions for the Wanes. Trans. Paul Ive. London.Google Scholar
Galen. 1951. De Sanitate Tuenda [Hygiene]. Ed. Robert Montraville Green. Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1988. “Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and its Subversion.” In Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, 21-65. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R. 1962. “War and Public Opinion in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.Past and Present 22: 1835.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R.. 1985. War and Society in Renaissance Europe: 1450-1620. New York.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. 1992. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England Chicago.Google Scholar
Hughes, Paul L. and James F. Larkin, eds. 1964. Tudor Royal Proclamations. New Haven.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Lawrence. [1563] 1973. The Nobles. Reprint, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Institution of a Gentleman. [1555] 1839. Reprint, London.Google Scholar
James I. 1603. Basilikon Down or His Majesties Instructions to his Dearest Sonne, Henry the Prince. London.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Paul A. 1956. Shakespeare's Military World. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Keeton, George W. 1967. Shakespeare's Legal and Political Background. London.Google Scholar
Kelly, Henry Ansgar. 1970. Divine Providence in the England of Shakespeare's Histories. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kyle, Donald G. 1987. Athletics in Ancient Athens. Leiden.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander. 1988. Shakespeare's Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays. London and New York.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolb. 1965. L'arte della Guerra. Trans. Ellis Farneworth. Indianapolis and New York.Google Scholar
Manning, Roger B. 1993. Hunters and Poachers: A Social and Cultural History of Unlawful Hunting in England, 1485-1640. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1998. Bloody Constraint: War and Chivalry in Shakespeare. Oxford.Google Scholar
Milton, John. 1991. John Milton, ed. Stephen Orgel and Jonathan Goldberg. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, Richard. 1994. Positions Concerning the Training Up of Children. Ed. William Barker. Toronto.Google Scholar
Peacham, Henry. 1962. The Complete Gentleman. Ed. Virgil B. Heltzel. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Plato. 1987. Republic. Trans. Desmond Lee. New York.Google Scholar
Prior, Moody E. 1973. The Drama of Power: Studies in Shakespeare's History Plays. Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Reese, M. M. 1961. The Cease of Majesty: A Study of Shakespeare's History Plays. London.Google Scholar
Ribner, Irving. 1957. The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Rich, Barnabe. 1578. Allarme to England. London.Google Scholar
Richmond, H. M. 1967. Shakespeare's Political Plays. New York.Google Scholar
Riggs, David. 1971. Shakespeare's Heroical Histories: Henry VI and its Literary Tradition. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, (2nd ed.). Ed. G. Bkkemore Evans. Boston.Google Scholar
Sidney, Sir Philip. 1989. Astrophil and Stella. In The Oxford Authors: Sir Philip Sidney. Ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sprague, Arthur Colby. 1964. Shakespeare's Histories: Plays for the Stage. London.Google Scholar
Talbert, Ernest William. 1962. The Problem of Order: Elizabethan Political Commonplaces and an Example of Shakespeare's Art. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W. 1944. Shakespeare's History Plays. New York.Google Scholar
Traversi, Derek Antona. 1957. Shakespeare: From Richard II to Henry V. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Vegetius. 1993. Vegetius: Epitome of Military Science. Intro. N. E Milner. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Webb, Henry J. 1965. Elizabethan Military Science: The Books and Practice. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Wells, Robin Headlam. 1985. “The Fortunes of Tillyard: Twentieth-Century Critical Debate on Shakespeare's History Plays.English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 66: 391403.Google Scholar