Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:09:23.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parens on Strauss's Recovery of Medieval Political Philosophy - Joshua Parens : Leo Strauss and the Recovery of Medieval Political Philosophy. Rochester Studies in Medieval Political Thought. (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2016. Pp. xvi, 191.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Miriam Galston
Miriam Galston*
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Symposium on Joshua Parens's Leo Strauss and the Recovery of Medieval Political Philosophy
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , Summer 2017 , pp. 478 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

3 My translation borrows from the translations of Eve Adler (PLA 75) and Fred Baumann (PLB 54).

4 In addition to the Commentary on the Mishnah and the Mishneh Torah, Maimonides wrote many medical treatises and responsa for Jews throughout the Islamic empire. He was also a practicing doctor and court physician, which required considerable travel.

5 See Parens 19, noting that Aristotle says little about religion and less about law (although he discusses regimes at length).

6 Of course, Alfarabi warns that experience can be sound or unsound. See Summary of Plato's “Laws” 3:7–9, in Mahdi, Muhsin, “The Editio Princeps of Fārābī’s Compendium Legum Platonis ,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 20 (1961): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar