Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

CATEGORICAL HARMONY AND PATH INDUCTION

  • PATRICK WALSH (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper responds to recent work in the philosophy of Homotopy Type Theory by James Ladyman and Stuart Presnell. They consider one of the rules for identity, path induction, and justify it along ‘pre-mathematical’ lines. I give an alternate justification based on the philosophical framework of inferentialism. Accordingly, I construct a notion of harmony that allows the inferentialist to say when a connective or concept is meaning-bearing and this conception unifies most of the prominent conceptions of harmony through category theory. This categorical harmony is stated in terms of adjoints and says that any concept definable by iterated adjoints from general categorical operations is harmonious. Moreover, it has been shown that identity in a categorical setting is determined by an adjoint in the relevant way. Furthermore, path induction as a rule comes from this definition. Thus we arrive at an account of how path induction, as a rule of inference governing identity, can be justified on mathematically motivated grounds.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY PITTSBURGH, PA 15213, USA E-mail: pwalsh@andrew.cmu.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

N. D Belnap . (1962). Tonk, plonk and plink. Analysis, 22(6), 130134.

J. Ladyman & S Presnell . (2015). Identity in homotopy type theory, part I: The justification of path induction. Philosophia Mathematica, 23(3), 386406.

F. W Lawvere . (1969). Adjointness in foundations. Dialectica, 23(3–4), 281296.

F. W Lawvere . (1970). Equality in hyperdoctrines and comprehension schema as an adjoint functor. Applications of Categorical Algebra, 17, 114.

J Mayberry . (1994). What is required of a foundation for mathematics? Philosophia Mathematica, 2(1), 1635.

J Peregrin . (2014). Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

F. Pfenning & R Davies . (2001). A judgemental reconstruction of modal logic. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, 11(4), 511540.

A. N Prior . (1960). The runabout inference-ticket. Analysis, 21(2), 3839.

P Schroeder-Heister . (2007). Generalized definitional reflection and the inversion principle. Logica Universalis, 1(2), 355376.

F Steinberger . (2009). Not so stable. Analysis, 69(4), 655661.

J. T Stevenson . (1961). Roundabout the runabout inference-ticket. Analysis, 21(6), 124128.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Review of Symbolic Logic
  • ISSN: 1755-0203
  • EISSN: 1755-0211
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-symbolic-logic
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 295 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th March 2017 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.