Skip to main content


  • KIT FINE (a1)

I extend the previously given truth-maker semantics and logic for imperatives to deontic statements.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Aloni, M. (2007). Free choice, modals, and imperatives. Natural Language Semantics, 15, 6594.
Aloni, M. D. & Ciardelli, I. A. (2013). A logical account of free choice imperatives. In Aloni, M. D. and Franke, M., editors. The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of φ, ?φ, and ◇φ – A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman. Available at:
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2005). Disjunction in a Modal Space. Handout of a paper presented at NYU Polarity Workshop.
Anderson, A. R. (1966). The formal analysis of normative systems. In Rescher, N., editor. The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 147214.
Anglberger, A. J. J., Korbmacher, F. L. G., & Faroldi, J. (2016). An exact truthmaker semantics for explicit permission and obligation. In Roy, O., Tamminga, A., and Willer, M., editors. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. 13th International Conference, DEON 2016. London: College Publications, pp. 1631.
Asher, N. & Bonevac, D. (2005). Free choice permission is strong permission. Synthese, 145, 303323.
Barcan-Marcus, R. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. Journal of Philosophy, 77 (3), 121–36.
Barker, C. (2010). Free choice permission as resource sensitive reasoning. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3, 138.
Fine, K. (2014). Permission and possible worlds. Dialectica, 68.3, 317336.
Fine, K. (2016). Angellic content. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45, 199226.
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Sauerland, U. and Stateva, P., editors. Compositional Semantics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 71120
Kamp, H. (1973). Free choice permission. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 74, 5774.
Kanger, S. (1971). New foundations for ethical theory. In Hilpinen, R., editor. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, pp. 3658.
Kaufmann, M. S. (2012). Interpreting Imperatives. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. New York: Springer.
Kratzer, A. (1977). What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 337355.
Kratzer, A. & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from japanese. In Otsu, Y., editor. Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, pp. 125.
Lewis, D. (1979). A problem about permission. In Saarinen, E., Niiniluoto, I., Hilpenin, R., and Provence, M., editors. Essays in Honor of Jaakko Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 163–75. Reprinted in Lewis (2000), pp. 20–33.
Lewis, D. (2000). Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mason, H. E. (editor) (1996). Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mastop, R. (2005). What Can You Do: Imperative Mood in Semantic Theory . Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Nute, D. (1985). Permission. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16, 169–90.
Portner, P. (2004). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Watanabe, K. and Young, R. B., editors. Proceedings of SALT 14. New York: CLC Publications, pp. 235252.
Portner, P. (2007). Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics, 15(4) (Winter 2007), 351383.
Portner, P. (2012). Permission and choice. In Grewendorf, G. and Zimmermann, T. E., editors. Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories. Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 4368.
van Rooij, R. (2000). Permission to change. Journal of Semantics, 17(2), 119143.
Segerberg, K. (1990). Validity and satisfaction in imperative logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31(2), 203221.
Fraassen, van (1973). Values and the heart’s command. Journal of Philosophy, 70.1, 519.
von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan.
Yablo, S. (2011). A problem about permission and possibility. In Egan, A. and Weatherstone, B., editors. Epistemic Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 270294.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Review of Symbolic Logic
  • ISSN: 1755-0203
  • EISSN: 1755-0211
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-symbolic-logic
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed