Skip to main content
×
×
Home

THE LOGIC OF JOINT ABILITY IN TWO-PLAYER TACIT GAMES

  • PETER HAWKE (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Logics of joint strategic ability have recently received attention, with arguably the most influential being those in a family that includes Coalition Logic (CL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL). Notably, both CL and ATL bypass the epistemic issues that underpin Schelling-type coordination problems, by apparently relying on the meta-level assumption of (perfectly reliable) communication between cooperating rational agents. Yet such epistemic issues arise naturally in settings relevant to ATL and CL: these logics are standardly interpreted on structures where agents move simultaneously, opening the possibility that an agent cannot foresee the concurrent choices of other agents. In this paper we introduce a variant of CL we call Two-Player Strategic Coordination Logic (SCL2). The key novelty of this framework is an operator for capturing coalitional ability when the cooperating agents cannot share strategic information. We identify significant differences in the expressive power and validities of SCL2 and CL2, and present a sound and complete axiomatization for SCL2. We briefly address conceptual challenges when shifting attention to games with more than two players and stronger notions of rationality.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY STANFORD UNIVERSITY 450 SERRA MALL STANFORD, CA 94305, USA E-mail: phawke@stanford.edu
References
Hide All
Ågotnes T., Goranko V., & Jamroga W. (2007). Alternating-time temporal logics with irrevocable strategies. In Samet D., editor. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK XI). New York, NY, USA: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, pp. 1524.
Alur R., Henzinger T. A., & Kupferman O. (2002). Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM, 49, 672713.
Bacharach M. (2006). Beyond Individual Choice. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Broersen J., Herzig A., & Troquard N. (2006). Embedding alternating-time temporal logic in strategic stit logic of agency. Journal of Logic and Computation, 16(5), 559578.
Chopra S., Pacuit E., & Parikh R. (2004). Knowledge-theoretic properties of strategic voting. In Alferes J. and Leite J., editors. Proceedings of Logics in Artificial Intelligence: 9th European Conference (JELIA), LNCS, Vol. 3229. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1830.
Fagin R., Halpern J. Y., Moses Y., & Vardi M. Y. (1995). Reasoning about Knowledge. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
Ghaderi H., Lesperance Y., & Levesque H. (2007). A logicial theory of coordination and joint ability. In Huhns M. and Shehory O., editors. Proceedings of Twenty-Second Conference on Artifical Intelligence (AAAI07). Vancouver, BC: ACM, pp. 421426.
Goranko V. & Hawke P. (2010). On the dynamics of information and abilities of players in multi-player games. In Proceedings of LOFT 10. Paper presented at the 9th Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 9), University of Toulouse, France, July 2010.
Goranko V. & Jamroga W. (2004). Comparing semantics for logics of multi-agent systems. Synthese, 139(2), 241280.
Goranko V., Jamroga W., & Turrini P. (2013). Strategic games and truly playable effectivity functions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 26, 288314.
Harsanyi J. (1977). Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Horty J. & Belnap N. (1995). A study of action, omission, ability and obligation. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24, 583644.
Horty J. F. (2001). Agency and Deontic Logic. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Leyton-Brown K. & Shoham Y. (2008). Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise, Multidisciplinary Introduction. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.
Mele A. R. (2003). Agent’s abilities. Nous, 37(3), 447470.
Pacuit E. & Roy O. (2016). Epistemic foundations of game theory. In Zalta E. N., editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. CA, USA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemic-game/.
Pacuit E. & Simon S. (2011). Reasoning with protocols under imperfect information. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(3), 412444.
Pauly M. (2001). Logic for Social Software. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Schelling T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
van Benthem J. (2007). Rational dynamics and epistemic logic in games. International Game Theory Review, 9(1), 1345.
van Benthem J. (2014). Logic in Games. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
van der Hoek W. & Jamroga W. (2004). Agents who know how to play. Fundamenta Informaticae, 62, 135.
van der Hoek W. & Pauly M. (2007). Modal logic for games and information. In Blackburn P., van Benthem J., and Wolter F., editors. Handbook of Modal Logic. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 10771148.
van der Hoek W., & Wooldridge M. (2003). Cooperation, knowledge and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica, 75, 125127.
van Ditmarsch H., Lang J., & Saffidine A. (2012). Strategic voting and the logic of knowledge. In Proceedings of 14th TARK. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Richland, SC, USA, pp. 12471248.
van Ditmarsch H., van der Hoek W., & Kooi B. (2008). Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
van Drimmelen G. & Goranko V. (2006). Complete axiomatization and decidability of alternating-time temporal logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 353, 93117.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Review of Symbolic Logic
  • ISSN: 1755-0203
  • EISSN: 1755-0211
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-symbolic-logic
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 901 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th March 2017 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.