Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T16:37:33.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEIGHBORHOOD SEMANTICS FOR INTENTIONAL OPERATORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

GRAHAM PRIEST
GRAHAM PRIEST*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne, and Department of Philosophy, University of St Andrews
*
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS, ST. ANDREWS, KY16 9AL, UK. E-mail: gpriest@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Towards NonBeing (Priest, 2005) gives a noneist account of the semantics of intentional operators and predicates. The semantics for intentional operators are modelled on those for the □ in normal modal logics. In this paper an alternative semantics, modelled on neighborhood semantics for □, is given and assessed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 360 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arló-Costa, H., & Pacuit, E. (2006). First-order classical modal logic. Studia Logica, 84, 171–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chellas, B. (1989). Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria, 36, 373–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2001). Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Revised as Part 1 of Priest (2008).Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2005). Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2006). In Contradiction (second edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2008). Introduction to Non-Classical Logic: From If to Is. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, G. (2009). Against against non-being.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (1970). Advice on modal logic. In Lambert, K., editor. Philosophical Problems in Logic. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, pp. 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillari, G. (2008). Quantified logic of awareness and impossible possible worlds. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waagbø, G. (1992). Quantified modal logic with neighbourhood semantics. Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 38, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar