Skip to main content
×
Home

ON THE INFINITE IN MEREOLOGY WITH PLURAL QUANTIFICATION

  • MASSIMILIANO CARRARA (a1) and ENRICO MARTINO (a1)
Abstract

In “Mathematics is megethology,” Lewis reconstructs set theory using mereology and plural quantification (MPQ). In his recontruction he assumes from the beginning that there is an infinite plurality of atoms, whose size is equivalent to that of the set theoretical universe. Since this assumption is far beyond the basic axioms of mereology, it might seem that MPQ do not play any role in order to guarantee the existence of a large infinity of objects. However, we intend to demonstrate that mereology and plural quantification are, in some ways, particularly relevant to a certain conception of the infinite. More precisely, though the principles of mereology and plural quantification do not guarantee the existence of an infinite number of objects, nevertheless, once the existence of any infinite object is admitted, they are able to assure the existence of an uncountable infinity of objects. So, if—as Lewis maintains—MPQ were parts of logic, the implausible consequence would follow that, given a countable infinity of individuals, logic would be able to guarantee an uncountable infinity of objects.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF PADUA, PADOVA, ITALY. E-mail:massimiliano.carrara@unipd.it
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF PADUA, PADOVA, ITALY. E-mail:enrico.martino@unipd.it
References
Hide All
Boolos G. (1984). To be is to be a value of a variable. (Or to be some values of some variables). Journal of Philosophy, 81, 430449.
Boolos G. (1985). Nominalist platonism. Philosophical Review, 94, 327344.
Burkhardt H., Seibt J., & Imaguire G.., editors. (2009). Handbook of Mereology. Munich, Germany: Philosophia Verlag.
Carrara M., & Martino E. (2009). On the ontological commitment of mereology. Review of Symbolic Logic, 2, 164174.
Hellman G. (1996). Structuralism without structures. Philosophia Mathematica, 4, 100123.
Lewis D. K. (1991). Parts of Classes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lewis D. K. (1993). Mathematics is megethology. Philosophia Mathematica, 1, 323.
Martino E. (1996). La teoria degli insiemi in un platonismo nominalista. In Abrusci V. M., Cellucci C., Cordeschi R., and Fano V., editors. Prospettive della logica e della filosofia della scienza. Pisa, Italy: ETS, pp. 445451.
Pollard S. (1988). Plural quantification and the axiom of choice. Philosophical Studies, 54, 393397.
Simons P. (2000). Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Review of Symbolic Logic
  • ISSN: 1755-0203
  • EISSN: 1755-0211
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-symbolic-logic
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 151 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.