Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Brogaard, Berit and Gatzia, Dimitria Electra 2015. Time and Time Perception. Topoi, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 257.

  • Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, Volume 50
  • March 2002, pp. 137-152

Mc Taggart and the Truth about Time


McTaggart famously argued that time is unreal. Today, almost no one agrees with his conclusion.1 But his argument remains the locus classicus for both the A–theory and the B-theory of time. I want to show how McTaggart's argument provided the impetus for both of these opposing views of the nature of time. I will also present and defend what I take to be the correct view of the nature of time.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. L. Craig 1998. ‘McTaggart's Paradox and the Problem of Temporary Intrinsics’, Analysis 58, 122–27.

M. Dummett 1960. ‘A Defense of McTaggart's Proof of the Unreality of Time’, Philosophical Review 69, 497504.

Q. Smith Language and Time, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)

T. L. S. Sprigge 1992. ‘The Unreality of Time’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92, 119.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements
  • ISSN: 1358-2461
  • EISSN: 1755-3555
  • URL: /core/journals/royal-institute-of-philosophy-supplements
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *