Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

On Becoming, Cosmic Time and Rotating Universes1


In the literature on the compatibility between the time of our experience and the time of physics, the special theory of relativity has enjoyed central stage. By bringing into the discussion the general theory of relativity, I suggest a new analysis of the misunderstood notion of becoming, developed from hints in Gödel's published and unpublished arguments for the ideality of time. I claim that recent endorsements of such arguments, based on Gödel's own ‘rotating’ solution to Einstein's field equation, fail: once understood in the right way, becoming can be shown to be both mind-independent and compatible with spacetime physics. Being a needed tertium quid between views of time traditionally regarded as in conflict, such a new approach to becoming should also help to dissolve a crucial aspect of the century-old debate between the so-called A and B theories of time.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Callender 1997. ‘Review of M. Dorato's Time and Reality, Bologna, Clueb 1995’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 117–20.

R. Clifton and M. Hogarth 1995. ‘The Definability of Becoming in Minkowski Spacetime’, Synthese, 103, 355–87.

D. Dieks 1988. ‘Discussion: Special Relativity and the Flow of Time’, Philosophy of Science, 55, 456460.

K. Gödel (1949b. ‘An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solution of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation’, Review of Modern Physics, 21, 447–50.

W. Godfrey-Smith 1979. ‘Special Relativity and the Present’, Philosophical Studies, 36, 233–44.

J. Kim 1976. ‘Events as property exemplification’, in Brand M. and Walton d. (eds), Action Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 159–77.

N. Maxwell 1985. ‘Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?’, Philosophy of Science, 52, pp. 2343.

A. Padgett 1992. God, Eternity and the Nature of Time, New York: St. Martin's Press.

H. Putnam 1967. ‘Time and Physical Geometry’, The Journal of Philosophy, 64, pp. 240–47.

N. Rakic 1997. ‘Past, present and future and special relativity’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 257280.

C. Rietdijk 1966. ‘A rigorous proof of determinism derived from the special theory of relativity’, Philosophy of Science, 33, 341–44.

B. Russell 1915. ‘On the Experience of Time’, Monist, 25, 212–33.

S. Saunders 1996. ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics and Tense’, Synthese, 107, 1953.

S. Savitt 1994. ‘The Replacement of Time’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 463474.

H. Stein 1968. ‘On Einstein-Minkowski spacetime’, Journal of Philosophy, 65, 523.

H. Stein 1970. ‘On the Paradoxical Time-Structure of Gödel,Philosophy of Science, 37, 589601.

H. Stein 1991. ‘On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future’, Philosophy of Science, 58, 147–67.

H. Wang 1995. ‘Time in Philosophy and in Physics from Kant and Einstein to Gödel’, Synthese, 102, 215–34.

R. Weingard 1972. ‘Relativity and the Reality of Past and Future Events’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 23, 199221.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements
  • ISSN: 1358-2461
  • EISSN: 1755-3555
  • URL: /core/journals/royal-institute-of-philosophy-supplements
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 7 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 148 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.