Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T20:30:14.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The only sure sign …’: Thought and Language in Descartes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2010

John Cottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some people like to think that the modern discipline of philosophy has little if anything to learn from the history of the subject, but in reality the philosophical inquiries of each generation always take shape against the background of an implicit dialogue with the actual or imagined ideas of past thinkers. Many of our current debates on the relationship between thought and language bear the imprint of what the ‘father of modern philosophy’ said, or is supposed to have said.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 42 , March 1997 , pp. 29 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Referances

Bacon F. 1905. The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, ed. J. M. Robertson (reprinted from the translation of Ellis and Spedding). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & WorldGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1976. ‘The Role of the Malignant Demon’, Studia Leibnitiana 8, 257–64Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1978a. ‘A Brute to the Brutes? Descartes' Treatment of Animals’, Philosophy 53, 551–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1978b. ‘Descartes on Thought’, The Philosophical Quarterly 28, 208–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1988. The Rationalists. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1993. A Descartes Dictionary. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1996. ‘Cartesian Ethics: Reason and the Passions’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 196, 193–298Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. (Forthcoming). Philosophy and the Good Life: Reason and the Passions in Greek, Cartesian and Psychoanalytic Ethics. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
J, Cottingham. (ed.) 1992. The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. 1964–1976. CEuvres de Descartes, 12 volumes, ed. Adam, C. and Tannery, P., revised edition. Paris: Vrin/CNRS. (Referred to here as ‘AT’)Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volumes I and II, ed. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge University Press. (Referred to here as ‘CSM’)Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume III, The Correspondence, ed. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D. and , Kenny. Cambridge University Press. (Referred to here as ‘CSMK’)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, T. S. 1963. Collected Poems 1909–1935. London: Faber & FaberGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S. 1993. Irrationality and the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, J. (Forthcoming). ‘Art and Illusion in Descartes’ Optics', unpublished.Google Scholar
Jolley, N. 1990. The Light of the Soul. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Malebranche, N. 1959–1966. CEuvres Complètes, ed. Robinet, A.. Paris: VrinGoogle Scholar
Montaigne, M. de. 1987. An Apology for Raymond Sebond, trans. Screech, M. A.. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
G, Moyal. (ed.). 1991. Descartes: Critical Assessments. 4 vols. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. 1978. Descartes. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar