Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?

  • Frederick Ferré

Extract

Many environmental thinkers are torn in two opposing directions at once. For good reasons we are appalled by the damage that has been done to the earth by the ethos of heedless anthropocentric individualism, which has achieved its colossal feats of exploitation, encouraged to selfishness by its world view—of relation-free atoms—while chanting ‘reduction’ as its mantra. But also for good reasons we are repelled, at the other extreme, by environmentally correct images of mindless biocentric collectivisms in which precious personal values are overridden for the good of some healthy beehive ‘whole’.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All

1 This paradox-prone term was first proposed in Ferré, 1989. See especially pp. 238 ff.

2 See, for example, Regan, 1990, p.78; but see also Midgley, 1983, ch. 9 for a characteristically sensible antidote.

3 For further support of the present both/and argument, see Midgley, 1978, ch. 10, ‘Speech and Other Excellences’, and ch. 11, ‘On Being Animal as Well as Rational’.

4 On this, and other related issues, see Merchant, 1990, for a thoughtful exploration of ‘egoistic’, ‘homocentric’, and ‘ecocentric’ ethics.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed