Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:37:38.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Values-Based Practice: A Theory-Practice Dynamic for Navigating Values and Difference in Health Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Abstract

This chapter introduces values-based practice as a resource for working with individually diverse values in health and social care, and describes its origins in an on-going development through the resources of philosophy. The chapter is in two main sections. Section I, Values-Based Practice, builds on two brief interactive exercises to introduce and explain the key features of values-based practice. As a relatively recent addition to the range of resources for working with values in health and social care, values-based practice is distinctive in focussing on the diversity of values comprising individual lived experience. Like evidence-based practice, values-based practice is a process-driven rather than an outcome-driven methodology. That is to say, rather than offering prescribed answers, both approaches offer processes that support decision-makers in coming to answers for themselves based on the particular circumstances presented by the situation in question. Although entirely complementary, the processes involved are of course different. Where evidence-based practice relies on meta-analyses of the results of high-quality clinical trials to inform a consensual model of decision-making, values-based practice builds on learnable clinical skills and other process elements to inform a dissensual model of decision-making rather than seeking to overcome value-conflicts in reaching consensus. Working within a premise of mutual respect for differences of values, and guided by three key principles linking values and evidence, values-based practice, as described in the chapter, supports dissensual decision-making, balanced according to the circumstances presented by the decision in question, within frameworks of locally-set frameworks of shared values. Section II, The Theory-Practice Dynamic, then outlines the theory-practice dynamic on which values-based practice is based. The origins of values-based practice in mid-twentieth century ordinary language philosophy of the Oxford School are outlined. As the chapter illustrates, although a limited area of analytic philosophy, many aspects of values-based practice are informed by ordinary language philosophy, ranging from its premise, through the training exercises and other process elements described in Section I, to its role in hybrid empirical studies supporting its model of service delivery. The development of values-based practice, furthermore, as section II goes on to describe, is ongoing, with key initiatives drawing not only on both analytic and Continental traditions of European philosophy, but also on non-European philosophies such as those of Africa and the Caribbean.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, John, ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57 (1956/7), 130. Reprinted in A.R. White (ed.), The Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John, Philosophical Papers, 3rd edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, Anna, ‘Moral Perception and Relational Self-Cultivation: Reassessing Attunement as a Virtue’, in Werkhoven, S. and Dennis, M. (eds.), Ethics and Self-Cultivation: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2018a), 197221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, Anna, ‘Moral Perception, Thick Concepts and Perspectivalism’, in Bergqvist, Anna and Cowan, R. (eds.), Evaluative Perception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018b), 258–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergqvist, Anna, ‘Narrative Understanding, Value and Diagnosis: A Particularist Account of Clinical Formulations and Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health’, Philosophy, Psychology & Psychiatry, 27:2 (2020), 149–67.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Anna, ‘Psychiatric Ethics’, in Panizza, Silvia Caprioglio and Hopwood, Mark (eds.), The Murdochian Mind (London: Routledge, 2022), 479–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (trans.), St Augustine Confessions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Colombo, Anthiny, Bendelow, Gillian, Fulford, Kenneth, and Williams, Simon, ‘Evaluating the Influence of Implicit Models of Mental Disorder on Processes of Shared Decision Making within Community-Based Multidisciplinary Teams’, Social Science & Medicine, 56 (2003), 1557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz-Keay, David and Fulford, Kenneth, ‘Voices, Values and Values-Based Practice: Engaging with What Matters in Voice Hearing’, in Parker, I., Schnackenberg, J., and Hopfenbeck, Mark (eds.), The Practical Handbook of Hearing Voices: Therapeutic and Creative Approaches (Monmouth, UK: PCCS Books, 2021), 113–22.Google Scholar
Fann, K.T. (ed.), Symposium on J.L. Austin (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969).Google Scholar
Fulford, Kenneth, Moral Theory and Medical Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, reprinted 1995 and 1999).Google Scholar
Fulford, Kenneth, ‘Editorial’, JNDS (Journal of the Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences), 1:4 (2020), available at: https://journal.nds.ox.ac.uk/index.php/JNDS/article/view/125.Google Scholar
Fulford, Kenneth, Morris, Katherine, Sadler, John, and Stanghellini, Giovanni (eds.), Nature and Narrative: An Introduction to the New Philosophy of Psychiatry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, Kenneth and Colombo, Anthony, ‘Six Models of Mental Disorder: A Study Combining Linguistic-Analytic and Empirical Methods’, Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 11:2 (2004), 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, K.W.M (Bill), Peile, Ed, and Carrol, Heidi, Essential Values-Based Practice: Clinical Stories Linking Science with People (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, Kenneth, King, Colin, and Bergqvist, Anna, ‘The Inter-Personal Lived World of Values and Race Equality in Mental Health’, PSN (Psychiatrie. Sciences Humaines and Neuroscience), 21:1 (2023), 3146.Google Scholar
Council, General Medical, Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions Together (London: The Genral Medical Council, 2008).12Google Scholar
Handa, Ashok, Fulford-Smith, Lucy, Barber, Zoe, Dobbs, Thomas, Fulford, Kenneth, and Peile, Edward, ‘The Importance of Seeing Things from Someone Else's Point of View’, BMJ Careers online journal (2016), available at: http://careers.bmj.com/careers/advice/The_importance_of_seeing_things_from_someone_else's_point_of_view.Google Scholar
Hare, Richard, The Language of Morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Hare, Richard, ‘Descriptivism’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 49 (1963), 115–34. Reprinted in R.M. Hare, Essays on the Moral Concepts (London: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar
Herring, Jonathan, Fulford, Kenneth, Dunn, Michael, and Handa, Ashok, ‘Elbow Room for Best Practice? Montgomery, Patients’ values, and Balanced Decision-Making in Person-Centred Care’, Medical Law Review, 25:4 (2017), 582603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerl, Christoph, ‘Understanding, Explaining, and Intersubjectivity in Schizophrenia’, Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 8:2 (2017), 83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Julian, Crepaz-Keay, David, Emmett, Charlotte, and Fulford, Kenneth, ‘The Montgomery Ruling, Individual Values and Shared Decision-Making in Psychiatry’, British Journal of Psychiatry Advances, 24 (2018), 93100.Google Scholar
King, Colin, Clarke, Simon, Gillard, Steven, and Fulford, Kenneth, ‘Beyond the Color Bar: Sharing Narratives in Order to Promote a Clearer Understanding of Mental Health Issues across Cultural and Racial Boundaries’, in Stoyanov, Drozdstoj, Stanghellini, Giovanni, Staden, Werdie Van, Wong, Michael, and Fulford, Kenneth (eds.), International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice: Case Studies and Commentaries (Berlin: Springer Nature, 2021), 403–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koralus, Philipp and Mascarenhas, Salvador, ‘The Erotetic Theory of Reasoning: Bridges between Formal Semantics and the Psychology of Deductive Inference’, Philosophical Perspectives, 27:1 (2013), 312–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencken, H.L., Prejudices: Second Series (Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing, 1920, reprinted 2006).Google Scholar
Messas, Guilherme, The Existential Structure of Substance Disorders: A Psychopathological Study (Berlin: Springer Nature, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messas, Guilherme and Fulford, Kenneth, ‘Three Dialectics of Disorder: Refocusing Phenomenology For 21st Century Psychiatry’, Lancet Psychiatry, 8:10 (2021a), 855–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messas, Guilherme and Fulford, Kenneth, ‘A Values-Based Phenomenology for Substance Use Disorder: A New Approach for Clinical Decision-Making’, Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 38 (2021b), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (judgement delivered 11 March 11 2015): https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0136.html.Google Scholar
NICE, Shared Decision Making NICE Guideline (London: National Institute for Health and care Excellence, 2021).Google Scholar
Parrott, Matthew and Koralus, Philipp, ‘The Erotetic Theory of Delusional Thinking’, Journal of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 20:5 (2015), 398415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, Hilary, The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and other Essays (Cambridge, MA, and London, England: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (London and New York: Penguin Books, 1963).13Google Scholar
Sackett, David, S.E. Straus, Scott Richardson, William Rosenberg, and R.B. Haynes, Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM, 2nd edition, (Edinburgh and London: Churchill Livingstone, 2000).Google Scholar
Slade, Michael, Amering, Michaela, Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O'Hagan, M., Panther, G., Perkins, Rachel, Shepherd, G., Tse, S., and Whitley, R., ‘Uses and Abuses of Recovery: Implementing Recovery-Oriented Practices in mental Health Systems’, World Psychiatry, 13 (2014), 1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanghellini, Giovanni, Lost in Dialogue: Anthropology, Psychopathology, and Care (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Stanghellini, Giovanni, ‘The PHD Method for Psychotherapy: Integrating Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, and Psychodynamics’, Psychopathology, 52:2 (2019), 7584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanghellini, Giovanni, Castellini, G., Brogna, P., Faravelli, C., and Ricca, V., ‘Identity and Eating Disorders (IDEA): A Questionnaire Evaluating Identity and Embodiment in Eating Disorder Patients’, Psychopathology, 45:3 (2012), 147–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, Dan J., Nielsen, Kris, Hartford, Anna, Gagné-Julien, Anne-Marie, Glackin, Shane, Friston, Karl, Maj, Mario, Zachar, Peter and Aftab, Awais, ‘Philosophy of Psychiatry: Theoretical Advances and Clinical Implications’, World Psychiatry (forthcoming, 2023).Google Scholar
Stoyanov, Drozdstoj, Stanghellini, Giovanni, Van Staden, Werdie, Wong, Michael, and Fulford, Kenneth (eds.), International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice: Case Studies and Commentaries (Berlin: Springer Nature, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ujewe, Sanuel and Van Staden, Werdie, ‘Policy-Making Indabas to Prevent “Not Listening”: An Added Recommendation from the Life Esidimeni Tragedy’, in Stoyanov, Drozdstoj, Stanghellini, Giovanni, Staden, Werdie Van, Wong, Michael, and Fulford, Kenneth, (eds.), International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice: Case Studies and Commentaries (Berlin: Springer Nature, 2021), 257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Staden, Werdie, ‘“Thinking Too Much”: A Clash of Legitimate Values in Clinical Practice Calls for an Indaba Guided by African Values-Based Practice’, in Stoyanov, Drozdstoj, Stanghellini, Giovanni, Van Staden, Werdie, Wong, Michael, and Fulford, Kenneth (eds), International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice: Case Studies and Commentaries (Berlin: Springer Nature, 2021), 179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatapuram, Sridhar, ‘Values-Based Practice and Global Health’, in Loughlin, M. (ed.), Debates in Values-Based Practice: Arguments For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnock, Geoffrey, J.L. Austin (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Woodbridge, Kim and Fulford, Kenneth, Whose Values? A Workbook for Values-Based Practice in Mental Health Care (London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2004).14Google Scholar