Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:56:56.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of harvest time and soaking treatment on cell cycle activity in sugarbeet seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Elwira Ś;liwiń;ska ,
Hai-Chun Jing ,
Claudette Job ,
Dominique Job ,
Jan H.W. Bergervoet ,
Raoul J. Bino  and
Steven P.C. Groota
Elwira Ś;liwiń;ska
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Technology and Agriculture, Kaliskiego 7, 85–796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Hai-Chun Jing
Affiliation:
Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Science, Tianjin 300192, PR, China
Claudette Job
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Mixte CNRS / Rhône-Poulenc, Rhône-Poulenc Agrochimie, 14–20 rue Pierre Baizet, 69263 Lyon cedex 9, France
Dominique Job
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Mixte CNRS / Rhône-Poulenc, Rhône-Poulenc Agrochimie, 14–20 rue Pierre Baizet, 69263 Lyon cedex 9, France
Jan H.W. Bergervoet
Affiliation:
Department of Reproduction Technology, Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO), POB 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Raoul J. Bino
Affiliation:
Department of Reproduction Technology, Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO), POB 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Steven P.C. Groota*
Affiliation:
Department of Reproduction Technology, Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO), POB 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Correspondence Fax: +31 317 47 80 94 Email: s.p.c.groot@cpro.dlo.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cell cycle activity in dry and germinating untreated and treated (soaked in water and subsequently in fungicide) seeds of two sugarbeet cultivars, collected at commercial harvest time (late mature seeds) and about 2 weeks before this (immature seeds), was investigated by flow cytometry, and by immuno-detection of β-tubulin and the B-subunit of the 11 S globulin. Germination capacity and field emergence were tested. With dry seeds of both cultivars, higher G2 / G1 ratios were observed in the radicle tips of late mature seeds, as compared with those from immature seeds. The late mature seeds contained more partly degraded (soluble) B-subunit of 11 S globulin, typical of germinating or primed sugarbeet seeds. Thus events associated with the onset of germination had occurred in the seed lots collected at commercial harvest time. The cytoskeleton protein β-tubulin was not detectable in dry seeds from either harvest. Western blotting revealed an accumulation of β-tubulin during germination and this was faster in the late mature harvested seeds which was correlated with the onset of DNA replication. Soaking enhanced the rate of cell cycle activation during germination as well as vigour, germination capacity, and field emergence. There was positive correlation between the G2 / G1 ratio and the traits examined in laboratory and field tests. It is concluded that a combined analysis of proteins and cell-cycle-related events can be used in understanding and predicting sugarbeet seed quality.

Keywords

11 S globulinBeta vulgaris L.β-tubulinDNA replicationflow cytometrygermination markersseed treatment

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 91 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. and Watson, J.D. (1994) Molecular biology of the cell. (3rd edition) New York, Garland.Google Scholar
Battle, J.P. and Whittington, W.J. (1969a) The relation between inhibitory substances and variability in time to germination of sugar beet clusters. Journal of Agricultural Science 73, 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battle, J.P. and Whittington, W.J. (1969b) The influence of genetic and environmental factors on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science 73, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bino, R.J., de Vries, J.N., Kraak, H.L. and van Pijlen, J.G. (1992) Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in tomato seeds during priming and germination. Annals of Botany 69, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bino, R.J., Lanteri, S., Verhoeven, H.A. and Kraak, H.L., (1993) Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in seed tissues. Annals of Botany 72, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bino, R.J., Bergervoet, J.H.W. and Lanteri, S. (1995) The use of cell cycle activity as an early indicator for the start of the germination process. pp. 11–17 in Fourth National Symposium on Stand Establishment of Horticultural Crops, UC-Davis (USA).Google Scholar
Bino, R.J., Bergervoet, J.H.W., De Vos, C.H.R., Kraak, H.L., Lanteri, S., Van Der Burg, W.J. and Zheng, X.Y. (1996) Comparison of nuclear replication activity and protein expression patterns during tomato seed germination. Field Crops Research 45, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, K.J. (1986) Manipulation of seed water relations via osmotic priming to improve germination under stress conditions. HortScience 21, 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côme, D. and Thévenot, C. (1982) Environmental control of embryo dormancy and germination. pp. 271–298in Khan, A.A. (Ed.) The physiology and biochemistry of seed development, dormancy and germination. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, Elsevier Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
de Castro, R.D., Zheng, X.Y., Bergervoet, J.H.W., De Vos, C.H.R. and Bino, R.J. (1995) b-tubulin accumulation and DNA replication in imbibing tomato seeds. Plant Physiology 109, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, R.D., Hilhorst, H.W.M., Bergervoet, J.H.W., Groot, S.P.C. and Bino, R.J. (1998) Detection of b-tubulin in tomato seeds: optimisation of extraction and immunodetection procedures. Phytochemistry 47, 689–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deltour, R. (1985) Nuclear activation during early germination of the higher plant embryo. Journal of Cell Science 75, 43–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durrant, M.J. and Loads, A.H. (1990) Some changes in sugar beet seeds during maturation and after density grading. Seed Science and Technology 18, 11–21.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D.W., Harkins, K.R., Maddox, J.M., Ayres, N.M., Sharma, D.P. and Firoozabady, E. (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220, 1049–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Górnik, K., de Castro, R.D., Liu, Y., Bino, R.J. and Groot, S.P.C. (1997) Inhibition of cell division during cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) seed germination. Seed Science Research 7, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimwade, J.A., Grierson, D. and Whittington, W.J. (1987) The effect of differences in time to maturity on the quality of seed produced by different varieties of sugar beet. Seed Science and Technology 15, 135–145.Google Scholar
Hegarty, T.W. (1978) The physiology of seed hydration and dehydration, and the relation between water stress and the control of germination. Plant Cell Environment 1, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, K. and Yamamoto, R. (1977) The growth inhibitors in sugar beet seed balls. III. Changes of growth inhibitors contents in seed balls during maturity. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 46, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISTA, (International Seed Testing Association) (1985) International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Science and Technology 13, 322–447.Google Scholar
Job, C., Kersulec, A., Ravasio, L., Chareyre, S., Pepin, R. and Job, D. (1997) The solubilization of the basic subunit of sugarbeet seed 11-S globulin during priming. Seed Science Research 7, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lexander, K. (1969) Germination effects of low temperature during ripening of sugar beet seed. Proceedings of 32nd Winter Congress of IIRB, Report No. 2.4, Brussels.Google Scholar
Lexander, K. (1980) Seed composition in connection with germination and bolting of Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet). pp. 271–291in Hebblethwaite, P.D. (Ed.) Seed production. London-Boston, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Lexander, K. (1981) Physical and physiological seed characteristics influencing field emergence of sugar beet. pp. 21–36in Proceedings of 44th Winter Congress of IIRB.Google Scholar
Longden, P.C. (1971) Advanced sugar beet seed. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 77, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longden, P.C. (1986) Influence of the seed crop environment on the quality of sugar beet seed. pp. 1–16 in Proceedings of 49th Winter Congress of IIRB.Google Scholar
Redfearn, M. and Osborne, D.J. (1997) Effects of advancement on nucleic acids in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) seeds. Seed Science Research 7, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Śliwińska, E. (1996) Flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle of sugar beet seed during germination. Journal of Applied Genetics 37A, 254–257.Google Scholar
Śliwińska, E. (1997) Flow cytometric analysis of sugar beet seeds different in vigour. pp. 577–584in Ellis, R.H..; Black, M..; Hong, T.D. (Eds) Basic and Applied Aspects of Seed Biology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Śliwińska, E. (1998) Cell cycle activity during development of sugar beet seed. pp. 51–59in Maluszynska, J. (Ed.) Plant Cytogenetics. Katowice, Silesian University Publishers.Google Scholar
Snyder, F.W. (1963) Some physio-chemical factors of the fruit influencing speed of germination of sugar beet seed. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 12, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TeKrony, D.M. and Hardin, E.E. (1969) The problem of underdeveloped seeds occurring in monogerm sugarbeets. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 15, 625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.W., Scott, R.K. and Longden, P.C. (1980) The effects of mother-plant temperature on seed quality in Beta vulgaris L. (sugarbeet). pp. 257–270in Hebblethwaite, P.D. (Ed.) Seed production. London-Boston, Butterworths.Google Scholar