Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T07:22:28.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Granivore seed-size preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Troy M. Radtke
Troy M. Radtke*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1-306-337-2410 Email: troymradtke@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although seed-size preference by granivores is relative to the sizes of seeds offered by researchers, preferences are often inappropriately discussed and interpreted as if they are for absolute seed sizes. Granivores often prefer relatively small seeds in forests and relatively large seeds in herbaceous communities, although the absolute size of preferred seeds in each is often similar. These results are consistent with predictions of optimal foraging theory. Researchers are encouraged to take heed of optimal foraging theory and both relative and absolute seed size when interpreting seed-size preferences.

Keywords

absolute seed sizegranivoreoptimal foragingrelative seed sizeseed massseed-size preference

Information

Type
Research Opinion
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 81 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Azcarate, F.M., Arqueros, L., Sanchez, A.M. and Peco, B. (2005) Seed and fruit selection by harvester ants, Messor barbarus, in Mediterranean grassland and scrubland. Functional Ecology 19, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H.G. (1972) Seed weight in relation to environmental conditions in California. Ecology 53, 997–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blate, G.M., Peart, D.R. and Leighton, M. (1998) Post-dispersal predation on isolated seeds: a comparative study of 40 tree species in a Southeast Asian rainforest. Oikos 82, 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boman, J.S. and Casper, B.B. (1995) Differential postdispersal seed predation in disturbed and intact temperate forest. American Midland Naturalist 134, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booman, G.C., Laterra, P., Comparatore, V. and Murillo, N. (2009) Post-dispersal predation of weed seeds by small vertebrates: interactive influences of neighbor land use and local environment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 129, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.W. (1977) Species diversity and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58, 712–724.Google Scholar
Fenner, M. (1983) Relationships between seed weight, ash content and seedling growth in twenty-four species of Compositae. New Phytologist 95, 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q., Thompson, K., Valone, T.J. and Brown, J.H. (1995) The effects of vertebrate granivores and folivores on plant community structure in the Chihuahuan desert. Oikos 73, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hau, H.C. (1997) Tree seed predation on degraded hillsides in Hong Kong. Forest Ecology and Management 99, 215–221.Google Scholar
Henderson, C.B. (1990) The influence of seed apparency, nutrient content, and chemical defenses on dietary preferences in Dipodomys ordii. Oecologia 82, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holl, K.D. and Lulow, M.E. (1997) Effects of species, habitat, and distance from edge on post-dispersal seed predation in a tropical rainforest. Biotropica 29, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H.F. and Brown, J.S. (2000) Early effects of rodent granivory on experimental forb communities. Ecological Applications 10, 917–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H.F., Zorn-Arnold, B., Sullivan, A. and Brown, J.S. (2006) Massive and distinctive effects of meadow voles on grassland vegetation. Ecology 87, 3007–3013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulme, P.E. (1998a) Post-dispersal seed predation and seed bank persistence. Seed Science Research 8, 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, P.E. (1998b) Post-dispersal seed predation: consequences for plant demography and evolution. Perspectives on Plant Ecology and Evolutionary Sytematics 1, 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, J.S. and Swihart, R.K. (2000) Selection of mast by granivorous rodents of the central hardwood forest region. Journal of Mammalogy 81, 549–562.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelrick, M.I., MacMahon, J.A., Parameter, R.R. and Sisson, D.V. (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationship of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerley, G.I.H. and Erasmus, T. (1991) What do mice select for in seeds? Oecologia 86, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kollmann, J., Coomes, D.A. and White, S.M. (1998) Consistencies in post-dispersal seed predation of temperate fleshy-fruited species among seasons, years and sites. Functional Ecology 12, 683–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marone, L., Rossi, B.E. and Lopez De Casenave, J. (1998) Granivore impact on soil-seed reserves in the central Monte desert, Argentina. Functional Ecology 12, 640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, E. and Dirzo, R. (2007) Seed-size variation determines interspecific differential predation by mammals in a neotropical rain forest. Oikos 116, 1841–1852.Google Scholar
Mittelbach, G.G. and Gross, K.L. (1984) Experimental studies of seed predation in old-fields. Oecologia 65, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moles, A.T. and Drake, D.R. (1999) Post-dispersal seed predation on eleven large-seeded species from the New Zealand flora: a preliminary study in secondary forest. New Zealand Journal of Botany 37, 679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, A.T., Warton, D.I. and Westoby, M. (2003) Do small-seeded species have higher survival through seed predation than large-seeded species? Ecology 84, 3148–3161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, A.T., Ackerly, D.D., Tweddle, J.C., Dickie, J.B., Smith, R., Leishman, M.R., Mayfield, M.M., Pitman, A., Wood, J.T. and Westoby, M. (2007) Global patterns in seed size. Global Ecology & Biogeography 16, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, A.A. and Cavieres, L.A. (2006) A multi-species assessment of post-dispersal seed predation in the central Chilean Andes. Annals of Botany 98, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nepstad, D.C., Uhl, C., Pereira, C.A. and da Silva, J.M.C. (1996) A comparative study of tree establishment in abandoned pasture and mature forest of eastern Amazonia. Oikos 76, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osunkoya, O.O. (1994) Postdispersal survivorship of north Queensland rainforest seeds and fruits: effects of forest, habitat and species. Austral Ecology 19, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, E.M., Weisz, M., Lau, P. and Bulla, L. (2006) Granivory, seed dynamics and suitability of the seed-dish technique for granivory estimations in a neotropical savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology 22, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, J.P. and Baker, R.H. (1992) Optimal foraging in Peromyscus polionotus: the influence of item-size and predation risk. Behaviour 121, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolsky, R.H. and Price, M.V. (1990) Patch use by Dipodomys deserti (Rodentia: Heteromyidae): profitability, preference, and depletion dynamics. Oecologia 83, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulliam, H.R. (1985) Foraging efficiency, resource partitioning, and the coexistence of sparrow species. Ecology 66, 1829–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, G.H., Pulliam, H.R. and Charnov, E.L. (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology 52, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reader, R.J. (1993) Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species. Journal of Ecology 81, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgerson, L. (1998) Mechanical defense in seeds adapted for ant dispersal. Ecology 79, 1669–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T.J. (1987) Seed predation in relation to tree dominance and distribution in mangrove forests. Ecology 68, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, W.L. (1984) Optimal diet model and rodent food consumption. Animal Behaviour 32, 340–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar