Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:52:04.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mating system modulates degree of seed dormancy in Hypericum elodes L. (Hypericaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Angelino Carta ,
Gianni Bedini ,
Angela Giannotti ,
Laura Savio  and
Lorenzo Peruzzi
Angelino Carta*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Unit of Botany, University of Pisa, Via Luca Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Gianni Bedini
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Unit of Botany, University of Pisa, Via Luca Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Angela Giannotti
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Unit of Botany, University of Pisa, Via Luca Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Laura Savio
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Unit of Botany, University of Pisa, Via Luca Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Lorenzo Peruzzi
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Unit of Botany, University of Pisa, Via Luca Ghini 13, 56126, Pisa, Italy
*
*Correspondence E-mail: acarta@biologia.unipi.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Knowledge of processes responsible for seed dormancy can improve our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of reproductive systems. We examined the influence of the breeding system on primary seed dormancy in Hypericum elodes, an Atlantic–European softwater pools specialist plant that exhibits a mixed mating strategy (the ability to both self- and cross-pollinate) to set seeds. Seeds were obtained through hand pollination treatments performed in a natural population during three consecutive years. Primary dormancy of seeds recovered from each pollination treatment was measured by analysing the seed germination response at dispersal and after various periods of cold stratification. While all collected seeds exhibited physiological dormancy, the degree of primary dormancy was associated with the pollination treatments. Weak and rapid loss of primary dormancy characterized seeds recovered from self-pollinated flowers, while stronger dormancy was found in seeds obtained from cross-pollination. The association between pollination treatments and primary dormancy indicated that the mating system should be considered as a source of variation for dormancy degree, proportional to self- and cross-pollinations (selfing rate) within populations of this species. These results suggest that by shedding seeds with various degrees of dormancy, plants may distribute their offspring across time by means of polymorphism in germination response. We conclude that seed germination alone is not an appropriate fitness measure for inbreeding depression estimates, unless dormancy is removed.

Keywords

dormancy degreeinbreedinglife historymating systemseed germinationself–compatibility
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 299 - 305
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, L. and Milberg, P. (1998) Variation in seed dormancy among mother plants, populations and years of seed collection. Seed Science Research 8, 29–38.Google Scholar
Barrett, S.C.H. (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 274–284.Google Scholar
Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds: Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (2010) Effect of inbreeding depression and population size on seed germination: a review. pp. 8–9 in Pendleton, R.; Meyer, S.; Schultz, B. (Eds) Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. and Walker, S. (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package = lme4 (accessed accessed 20 March 2014).Google Scholar
Bewley, J.D., Bradford, K.J., Hilhorst, H.W.M. and Nonogaki, H. (2013) Seeds: Physiology of development, germination and dormancy. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. and White, J.S.S. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24, 127–135.Google Scholar
Brown, R.F. and Mayer, D.G. (1988) Representing cumulative germination 2. The use of the Weibull function and other empirically derived curves. Annals of Botany 61, 127–138.Google Scholar
Carta, A., Bedini, G., Müller, J.V. and Probert, R.J. (2013) Comparative seed dormancy and germination of eight annual species of ephemeral wetland vegetation in a Mediterranean climate. Plant Ecology 214, 339–349.Google Scholar
Carta, A., Probert, R., Puglia, G., Peruzzi, L. and Bedini, G. (2015a) Local climate explains degree of seed dormancy in Hypericum elodes L. (Hypericaceae). Plant Biology, doi: 10.1111/plb.12310.Google Scholar
Carta, A., Savio, L., Bedini, G., Peruzzi, L., Fisogni, A. and Galloni, M. (2015b) All in an afternoon: mixed breeding system in one-day lasting flowers of Hypericum elodes L. (Hypericaceae). Plant Biosystems, doi:10.1080/11263504.2014.1000421.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 18, 237–268.Google Scholar
Donohue, K., de Casas, R.R., Burghardt, L., Kovach, K. and Willis, C.G. (2010) Germination, postgermination adaptation, and species ecological ranges. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41, 293–319.Google Scholar
Eckert, C.G., Kalisz, S., Geber, M.A., Sargent, R., Elle, E., Cheptou, P.O., Goodwillie, C., Johnston, M.O., Kelly, J.K., Moeller, D.A., Porcher, E., Ree, R.H., Vallejo-Marín, M. and Winn, A.A. (2010) Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 35–43.Google Scholar
Fenner, M. and Thompson, K. (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch–Savage, W.E. and Footitt, S. (2012) To germinate or not to germinate: a question of dormancy relief not germination stimulation. Seed Science Research 22, 243–248.Google Scholar
Finch–Savage, W.E. and Leubner-Metzger, G. (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytologist 171, 501–523.Google Scholar
Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. and Eckert, C.G. (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36, 47–79.Google Scholar
Grime, J.P. (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Hoyle, G.L., Daws, M.I., Steadman, K.J. and Adkins, S.W. (2008) Pre-and post-harvest influences on physiological dormancy alleviation of an Australian Asteraceae species: Actinobole uliginosum (A. Gray) H. Eichler. Seed Science Research 18, 191–199.Google Scholar
Husband, B.C. and Schemske, D.W. (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50, 54–70.Google Scholar
Imbert, E. (2002) Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 5, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalisz, S., Vogler, D.W. and Hanley, K.M. (2004) Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430, 884–887.Google Scholar
Keller, L.F. and Waller, D.M. (2002) Inbreeding depression in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 230–241.Google Scholar
Kendall, S. and Penfield, S. (2012) Maternal and zygotic temperature signalling in the control of seed dormancy and germination. Seed Science Research 22 (S1), 23–29.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Y. and Yamamura, N. (2000) Evolution of seed dormancy due to sib competition: effect of dispersal and inbreeding. Journal of Theoretical Biology 202, 11–24.Google Scholar
Koornneef, M., Bentsink, L. and Hilhorst, H. (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5, 33–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. and Schemske, D.W. (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24–40.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D.G. and Schoen, D.J. (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. International Journal of Plant Science 153, 358–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesinos-Navarro, A., Picó, F.X. and Tonsor, S.J. (2012) Clinal variation in seed traits influencing life cycle timing in Arabidopsis thaliana . Evolution 66, 3417–3431.Google Scholar
Murphy, K.J. (2002) Plant communities and plant diversity in softwater lakes of northern Europe. Aquatic Botany 73, 287–324.Google Scholar
Picó, F.X. and Koubek, T. (2003) Inbreeding effects on fitness traits in the heterocarpic herb Leontodon autumnalis L. (Asteraceae). Acta Oecologica 24, 289–294.Google Scholar
Puglia, G., Grimaldi, S., Carta, A., Pavone, P. and Toorop, P. (2015) Pericarp structure of Glebionis coronaria (L.) Cass. ex Spach (Asteraceae) cypselae controls water uptake during germination. Seed Science Research 25, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.Rproject.org/ (accessed accessed 20 March 2014).Google Scholar
Ritz, C. and Streibig, J.C. (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software 12, 1–22.Google Scholar
Steadman, K.J. and Pritchard, H.W. (2004) Germination of Aesculus hippocastanum seeds following cold-induced dormancy loss can be described in relation to a temperature-dependent reduction in base temperature (Tb) and thermal time. New Phytologist 161, 415–425.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. and Ooi, M.K.J. (2010) To germinate or not: more than just a question of dormancy. Seed Science Research 20, 209–211.Google Scholar
Venable, D.L. (1985) The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. American Naturalist 126, 577–595.Google Scholar
Vleeshouwers, L.M., Bouwmeester, H.J. and Karssen, C.M. (1995) Redefining seed dormancy: an attempt to integrate physiology and ecology. Journal of Ecology 83, 1031–1037.Google Scholar
Weibull, W. (1951) A statistical distribution function of a wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 18, 293–297.Google Scholar
Willis, C.G., Baskin, C.C., Baskin, J.M., Auld, J.R., Venable, D.L., Cavender-Bares, J., Donohue, K. and Rubio de Casas, R. (2014) The evolution of seed dormancy: environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytologist 203, 300–309.Google Scholar
Winn, A.A., Elle, E., Kalisz, S., Cheptou, P.-O., Eckert, C.G., Goodwillie, C., Johnston, M.O., Moeller, D.A., Ree, R.H., Sargent, R.D. and Vallejo-Marin, M. (2011) Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating. Evolution 65, 3339–3359.Google Scholar