Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:48:27.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed-bank dynamics in the invasive plant, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

B. Fumanal*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1210 Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, BP 86510, F-21065Dijon Cedex, France
I. Gaudot
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, UMR1210 Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, F-21065Dijon Cedex, France
F. Bretagnolle
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, UMR1210 Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, F-21065Dijon Cedex, France
*
*Correspondence Fax: +33 3 80 69 32 62boris.fumanal@u-bourgogne.fr

Abstract

The seed-bank dynamics of Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae), an annual invasive plant introduced from North America to Europe, were studied in nine French populations developing in field crops, set-asides or wastelands. The vertical distribution of seeds was studied in two different depth sections (0–5 cm and 5–20 cm), and the spatial horizontal pattern of distribution was analysed for two selected field-crop and set-aside populations. The proportions of dormant, non-dormant and dead seeds, as well as the changes in seed-bank dormancy over time, were evaluated. Natural seedling recruitment and its variation under different disturbance treatments in competitive set-asides were also studied. From 536 ± 194 to 4477 ± 717 seeds m− 2 were found in the living seed bank (0–20 cm). The majority of seeds in field crops was found in the lower soil layer, whereas the opposite pattern was observed in set-asides and wastelands. Dormant seed proportions were low (0–18%) before natural germination, but then regularly increased. The seed bank of A. artemisiifolia was spatially aggregated irrespective of the extent of soil disturbance. On average, 23 ± 12 to 292 ± 62 seedlings m− 2 were recorded, with densities lower in set-asides than in field crops and wastelands. Seedling densities were not correlated to upper seed densities except for two field crops. Soil disturbance and the removal of vegetation had positive effects on seedling recruitment in set-asides. Seed-bank dynamics appear to be crucial in the invasive success of A. artemisiifolia, and this knowledge will provide insights for the management of the species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskin, C.C. and Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. San Diego, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bassett, I.J. and Crompton, C.W. (1975) The biology of Canadian weeds: 11. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and A. psilostachya DC. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 463476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F.A. (1968) Succession on abandoned fields in the Shawnee Hills, Southern Illinois. Ecology 49, 924936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F.A. (1970) Secondary dormancy in the seeds of the common ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 97, 302305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F.A. (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10, 351371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begon, M., Harper, J.L. and Townsend, C.R. (1990) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities (2nd edition). Oxford, UK, Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Benoit, D.L., Derksen, D.A. and Panneton, B. (1992) Innovative approaches to seedbank studies. Weed Science 40, 660669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béres, I. and Hunyadi, K. (1984) Dormancy and germination of common ragweed (Ambrosia elatior L.) seeds in the field in Hungary. Acta Agronomica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 33, 383387.Google Scholar
Bigwood, D.W. and Inouye, D.W. (1988) Spatial pattern analysis of seed banks: an improved method and optimized sampling. Ecology 69, 497507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvel, B., Dessaint, F., Cardinal-Legrand, C. and Bretagnolle, F. (2006) The historical spread of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in France from herbarium records. Journal of Biogeography 33, 665673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G.W. (2004) Alien species and evolution: the evolutionary ecology of exotic plants, animals, microbes, and interacting native species. Washington, DC, Island Press.Google Scholar
Davis, A.S. (2006) When does it make sense to target the weed seed bank? Weed Science 54, 558565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déchamp, C. and Méon, H. (2002) Ambroisies, polluants biologiques. Lyon, Arppam Press.Google Scholar
Dessaint, F. (1991) The spatial distribution of the seedbank: comparison of statistical procedures. Weed Research 31, 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessaint, F., Chadoeuf, R. and Barralis, G. (1991) Spatial pattern analysis of weed seeds in the cultivated soil seed bank. Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 721730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, W.E. (1995) Exploiting weed seed dormancy and germination requirements through agronomic practices. Weed Science 43, 498503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, M. and Thompson, K. (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R.G., Renner, K.A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R.G., Alm, D.A., Buhler, D.D. and Cardina, J. (1992) Weed seedbanks of the United States corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Science 40, 636644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Benech-Arnold, R.L., Sanchez, R. and Ghersa, C.M. (2000) Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Research 67, 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumanal, B., Chauvel, B. and Bretagnolle, F. (2007) Estimation of pollen and seed production of common ragweed in France. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 14, 233236.Google ScholarPubMed
Gebben, A.I. (1965) The ecology of common ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., in southeastern Michigan. PhD Thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor..Google Scholar
Ghersa, C.M. and Martinez-Ghersa, M.A. (2000) Ecological correlates of weed seed size and persistence in the soil under different tilling systems: implications for weed management. Field Crops Research 67, 141148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J.P. (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
Gross, K.L. (1990) A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Journal of Ecology 78, 10791093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J.L. (1977) Population biology of plants. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holt, B.R. (1972) Effect of arrival time on recruitment, mortality, and reproduction in successional plant populations. Ecology 53, 668673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, M.A., Cowling, R.M. and Richardson, D.M. (1992) The invasive potential of Australian banksias in South African fynbos: a comparison of the reproductive potential of Banksia ericifolia and Leucadendron laureolum. Australian Journal of Ecology 17, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalamees, R. and Zobel, M. (2002) The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology 83, 10171025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krinke, L., Moravcova, L., Pysek, P., Jarosik, V., Pergl, J. and Perglova, I. (2005) Seed bank of an invasive alien, Heracleum mantegazzianum, and its seasonal dynamics. Seed Science Research 15, 239248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laaidi, M., Laaidi, K., Besancenot, J.P. and Thibaudon, M. (2003) Ragweed in France: an invasive plant and its allergenic pollen. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 91, 195201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legendre, P. and Fortin, M-J. (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80, 107138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maillet, J.andLopez-Garcia, C. (2000) What criteria are relevant for predicting the invasive capacity of a new agricultural weed? The case of invasive American species in France. Weed Research 40, 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcova, L., Pysek, P., Pergl, J., Perglova, I. and Jarosik, V. (2006) Seasonal pattern of germination and seed longevity in the invasive species Heracleum mantegazzianum. Preslia 78, 287301.Google Scholar
Muller, S. (2004) Plantes invasives en France. Paris, Muséum National d'histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
Munier-Jolain, N.M., Chauvel, B. and Gasquez, J. (2002) Long-term modelling of weed control strategies: analysis of threshold-based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities. Weed Research 42, 107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinzing, A., Durka, W., Klotz, S.andBrandl, R. (2002) Which species become aliens? Evolutionary Ecology Research 4, 385405.Google Scholar
Pyke, D.A. (1990) Comparative demography of co-occurring introduced and native tussock grasses: persistence and potential expansion. Oecologia 82, 537543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raynal, D.J. and Bazzaz, F.A. (1973) Establishment of early successional plant populations on forest and prairie soil. Ecology 54, 13351341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H.A. (1981) Seed banks in soils. Advances in Applied Biology 6, 155.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M.S. (2001) PASSAGE. Pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Tempe, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Rothrock, P.E., Squiers, E.R. and Sheeley, S. (1993) Heterogeneity and size of a persistent seedbank of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and Setaria faberi Herrm. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 120, 417422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. pp. 335352in Di Castri, F.; Hansen, A.J.; Debussche, M. (Eds) Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., Liu, W., Baskin, J.M., Baskin, C.C. and Cao, M. (2006) Persistent soil seed banks of the globally significant invasive species, Eupatorium adenophorum, in Yunnan Province, south-western China. Seed Science Research 16, 157162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, A.W., Shaw, R.H. and Sforza, R. (2006) Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: a review of opportunities, regulations and other barriers to adoption. Weed Research 46, 93117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Oden, N.L. (1978) Spatial autocorrelation in biology – I: Methodology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 10, 199228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York, W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Stoller, E.W. and Wax, L.M. (1974) Dormancy changes and the fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil. Weed Science 22, 151155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. and Grime, J.P. (1979) Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in 10 contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67, 893921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K., Bakker, J.P. and Bekker, R.M. (1997) The soil seed banks of northwest Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toole, A.H. and Brown, E. (1946) Final results of the Duvel buried seed experiment. Journal of Agricultural Research 72, 201210.Google Scholar
van Groenendael, J.M. (1988) Patchy distribution of weeds and some implications for modelling population dynamics: a short literature review. Weed Research 28, 437441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T.M., Cardina, J. and White, A.D. (2003) Weed seed rain, soil seedbanks, and seedling recruitment in no-tillage crop rotations. Weed Science 51, 569575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, L. and Schweizer, E. (2002) Spatial dependence of weed seed banks and strategies for sampling. Weed Science 50, 595606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. (1996) Biological invasions. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Yakimowski, S.B., Hager, H.A. and Eckert, C.G. (2005) Limits and effects of invasion by the non-indigenous wetland plant Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife): a seed bank analysis. Biological Invasions 7, 687698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamura, K. (1999) Transformation using (x+0.5) to stabilize the variance of populations. Researches on Population Ecology 41, 229234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar