No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Neoliberal urban development, as a set of governance practices and regulationsintended to valorize cities as sites for capital accumulation, has increasedsocial polarization and produced enclaves or “cities withincities.” Local governments have relinquished administrative and legalcontrol to private corporations over how certain areas in the city are developedand used (or “consumed”) and by whom. In this article I examinethe emergence of governance strategies around urban fragmentation in Chester, anolder, former industrial city in southeastern Pennsylvania. My analysis focusesprimarily on modes of state (de)regulation and intervention in privatized urbanredevelopment, emphasizing how common patterns in governance have surfaceddespite changing definitions of “urban redevelopment” overdifferent time periods. In doing so, this analysis fits within critical studiesof actually existing neoliberalism, in which the forms and practices ofneoliberalism are examined as historically contingent and geographicallyspecific.