Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:58:01.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Petition-and-Response and Liminal Petitioning in Comparative/Historical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2019

David Zaret
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Before its deployment as a practice by insurgent social movements for mobilizing public opinion in the long nineteenth century, petitioning was a ubiquitous, relatively uniform practice with no connection to popular insurgency. It was nearly the inverse, though just as prominent, phenomenon: an instrument of state as opposed to an instrument of protest, occurring wherever rulership relied on administrative techniques for generating and deploying its authority. Humble subjects sought benevolent deployments of power in pursuit of goals that were within and not about the rules of the game. This mode of petitioning is aptly described as petition-and-response, a term of art from classical scholarship that is applicable to diverse patrimonial states across Eurasia with diverse ideological systems. The transition to modern petitioning as a repertoire for contentious politics was an extended, uneven process. It was facilitated initially by the unquestioned legitimacy of petitionary etiquette with regard to form and rhetoric, as opposed to explicit invocation of novel ideas about natural rights. Liminal petitioning had contradictory elements of deference to and defiance of power relations that diminished perceptions of novelty in novel activities that mobilized and invoked popular opinion on contentious political issues.

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 43 , Issue 3: The Transformation of Petitioning , Fall 2019 , pp. 431 - 451
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abisaab, Rula Jurdi (2004) Converting Persia: Religion and Power in the Safavid Empire. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Amanat, Abbas (1997) Pivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar and the Iranian Monarchy. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Anon. (1643) Remonstrans Redivivus: Or an Accompt of the Remonstrance and Petition. London: Rothwell and Underhill.Google Scholar
Anon. (1682) Vox Angliae, or, The Voice of the Kingdom Being a Collection of All Those Numerous Addresses Lately Presented to His Majesty from the Greatest Part of and Societies in England and Wales. London: J. Norris.Google Scholar
Anon. (1770) The State of the Nation, as Represented to a Certain Great Personage, by Junius and the Freeholder: And the Petition of the Citizens of London, for Redress of Grievances, with Their Address, Remonstrance, and Petition. London: H. W. Martin.Google Scholar
Bagnall, Roger S. (1995) Reading Papyri, Writing Ancient History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James (1913) The King’s Council in England during the Middle Ages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen (2008) Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, Robert (c. 1572). Formulary for a Clerk of the Council. MS 48150, Additional Manuscripts, London, British Library.Google Scholar
Beales, Derek (2007) “Joseph II, Petitions and the Public Sphere,” in Hamish, M. Scott (ed.) Cultures of Power in Europe during the Long Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 249–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Basat, Yuval (2013) Petitioning the Sultan: Protests and Justice in Late Ottoman Palestine. London: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercé, Yves-Marie (1987) Revolt and Revolution in Early Modern Europe: An Essay on the History of Political Violence. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bogin, Ruth (1988) “Petitioning and the New Moral Economy of Post-Revolutionary America.” William and Mary Quarterly 3rd series, 45: 392–425.Google Scholar
Boyar, Ebru, and Fleet, Kate (2010) A Social History of Ottoman Istanbul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, James E. (2007) “Parliament, Print Culture and Petitioning in Late Eighteenth-Century England.” Parliamentary History 26: 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briant, Pierre (2002) From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Warsaw, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Brown, Alfred L. (1989) The Governance of Late Medieval England, 1272–1461. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, James, 1st duke of Ormond (1643) Correspondence. MS 5, Carte Manuscripts, Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
Chambers, David, and Pullan, Brian (2004) Venice: A Documentary History, 1450–1630. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ch’u, T’ung-Tsu (1969) Local Government in China under the Ch’ing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, Serena (2009) “Petitioning in the Ancient World,” in Ormrod, Mark W., Dodd, Gwilym, and Musson, Anthony (eds.), Medieval Petitions: Grace and Grievance. London: Boydell & Brewer: 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Serena (2010) Lives behind the Laws: The World of the Codex Hermogenianus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Darke, Hubert (2002 [c.1090]) The Book of Government or Rules for Kings: The Siyar Al Muluk or SiyasatI. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darling, Linda T. (2013) A History of Social Justice and Political Power in the Middle East. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Robert C. (1991) Shipbuilders of the Venetian Arsenal: Workers and Workplace in the Preindustrial City. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, John P. (1950) “The Privy Council and Private Law in the Tudor and Stuart Period: II.” Michigan Law Review 48: 627–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, Horace W., and Kleimola, Ann Marie (1970) “The Petition (čelobitnaja) as an Old Russian Literary Genre.” Slavic and East European Journal 14: 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym (2007) Justice and Grace: Private Petitioning and the English Parliament in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym (2009) “Thomas Paunfield, the ‘heye Court of rightwisnesse’ and the Language of Petitioning in the Fifteenth Century,” in Ormrod, Mark W., Dodd, Gwilym, and Musson, Anthony (eds.) Medieval Petitions: Grace and Grievance. London: Boydell & Brewer: 222–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym (2011) “The Rise of English, the Decline of French: Supplications to the English Crown, c. 1420–1450,” Speculum 86(1), (January): 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym, and McHardy, A. K. (2010) Petitions to the Crown from English Religious Houses c. 1272–1485. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell.Google Scholar
Duindam, Jeroen (2014) “Toward a Comparative Understanding of Rulership: Discourses, Practices, Patterns,” in Duindam, Jeroen and Dabringhaus, Sabine (eds.) The Dynastic Centre and the Provinces: Agents and Interactions. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill: 225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Rongier, Louis (1980) “Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 42–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergene, Boğaç A. (2003) Local Court, Provincial Society and Justice in the Ottoman Empire: Legal Practice and Dispute Resolution in Çankiri and Kastamounu (1652–1744). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Qiang (2009) “Hot Potatoes: Chinese Complaint Systems from Early Times to the Late Qing (1898).” Journal of Asian Studies 68: 1105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floor, Wilem, ed. (2007 [c.1700]) Dastur al-Moluk: A Safavid State Manual. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers.Google Scholar
Foster, W., ed. (1899 [1615–19]) The Embassy of Sir Thomas Roe to the Court of the Great Mogul, 1615–1619. London: Hakluyt Society.Google Scholar
Fraser, Peter (1961) “Public Petitioning and Parliament before 1832.” History 46: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuess, Albrecht (2011) “Between dihlīz and dār al-‘adl: Forms of Outdoor and Indoor Royal Representation at the Mamluk Court in Egypt,” in Albrecht, Fuess and Jan-Peter, Hartung (eds.) Court Cultures in the Muslim World: Seventh to Nineteenth Centuries. London: Routledge: 149–67.Google Scholar
Haim, Heinz (1996) The Empire of the Mahdi: The Rise of the Fatamids. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hallo, William W. (1968) “Individual Prayer in Sumerian: The Continuity of a Tradition.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 88: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, William W. (1981) “Letters, Prayers and Letter-Prayers,” in World Congress of Jewish Studies (ed.) Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress of Jewish Studies. Jerusalem: Magnes Press: 17–27.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill (2001) Law and Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, James S. (1991) Justice upon Petition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haskett, Timothy S. (1996) “The Medieval English Court of Chancery.” Law and History Review 14: 245–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauken, Tor (1998) Petition and Response: An Epigraphic Study of Petitions to Roman Emperors. Bergen, Norway: Astra Books.Google Scholar
Hauken, Tor (2004) “Structure and Themes in Petitions to Roman Emperors,” in Denis, Feissel and Jean, Gascou (eds.) La Pétition à Byzance. Paris: Centre de recherché d’histoire et civilization de Byzance: 11–22.Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony (1994) Emperors and Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, R. A. (2014) Peasant Petitions. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Richard (2002) “Petitioning as Popular Politics in Sixteenth-Century England.” Historical Research 75: 365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, W. M. L., ed. (1915) Pliny Letters. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Imber, Colin (2002) The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650: The Structure of Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Imsen, Steinar, and Vogler, Günter (1997) “Communal Autonomy and Peasant Resistance in Northern and Central Europe,” in Peter, Blickle (ed.) Resistance, Representation, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 5–43.Google Scholar
James, I, King of England (1621) His Majesties Declaration, Touching His Proceedings in the Late Assemblie and Convention of Parliament. London: Norton and Bill.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Dennis P. (2007) Law and the Rural Economy in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Benjamin (2011) Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, William W. (1985) Deference and Defiance in Nineteenth-Century Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey (1990) “The Historical Development of the Structure of Medieval Arabic Petitions.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53: 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey (2006) Arabic Legal and Administrative Documents in the Cambridge Genizah Collections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiser, Edgar (1999) “Comparing Varieties of Agency Theory in Economics, Political Science, and Sociology.” Sociological Theory 17: 146–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, Edgar, and Linton, April (2002) “The Hinges of History: State-Making and Revolt in Early Modern France.” American Sociological Review 67: 889–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishlansky, Mark (1982) “Ideology and Politics in the Parliamentary Armies, 1645–1649,” in John, Morrill (ed.) Reactions to the English Civil War. London: Palgrave: 163–84.Google Scholar
Knights, Mark (2005) Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koziol, Geoffrey (1992) Begging Pardon and Favor: Ritual and Political Order in Early Medieval France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koziol, Geoffrey (2003) “The Early History of Rites of Supplication,” in Hélène, Millet Rome (ed.) Suppliques et requêtes: Le gouvernement par la grâce en Occident (XIIe–XVe siècle). Rome: Ecole Française de Rome: 21–36.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret (1989) Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Naphtali (1986) Greeks in Ptolemaic Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddy, Christian D., and Haemers, Jelle (2013) “Popular Politics in the Late Medieval City: York and Bruges.” English Historical Review 128: 771–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Tai-yung (1979) “The System of Direct Petition to the Throne in the Time of Ming Taizu.” Ming Studies 9: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linehan, Peter A., and Zutshi, Patrick (2007) “Fiat A: The Earliest Known Roll of Petitions Signed by the Pope (1307).” English Historical Review 122: 998–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebke, David M. (2004) “Signatures and Political Culture in Eighteenth-Century Germany.” Journal of Modern History 76: 497–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, John (2000) Antiochos III and the Cities of Western Asia Minor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macauley, Melissa Ann (1998) Social Power and Legal Culture: Litigation Masters in Late Imperial China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddicott, J. R. (1981) “Parliament and the Constituencies, 1272–1377,” in Davies, R. G. and Denton, J. H. (eds.) The English Parliament in the Middle Ages. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press: 61–87.Google Scholar
Mathisen, Ralph W. (2004) “Adnotatio and Petitio: The Emperor’s Favor and Special Exceptions in the Early Byzantine Empire,” in Feissel, Denis and Gascou, Jean (eds.) La Pétition à Byzance. Paris: Association des Amis du Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance: 23–32.Google Scholar
Mézeray, François Eudes de (1683) A General Chronological History of France, Beginning before the Reign of King Pharamond, And ending with the Reign of Henry the Fourth. London: Thomas Basset.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus (1977) The Emperor in the Roman World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus (1983) “Empire and City, Augustus to Julian: Obligations, Excuses and Status.” Journal of Roman Studies 73: 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Fergus (2006) A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II 408–450. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mookerji, Radha Kumud (1966) Chandragupta Maurya and His Times. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Necipoğlu, Gülru (1993) “Framing the Gaze in Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Palaces.” Ars Orientalis 23: 303–42.Google Scholar
Nichols, John (1828) The Progresses, Processions, and Magnificent Festivities, of King James the First. London: J. B. Nichols.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jørgen S. (1985) Secular Justice in an Islamic State: Maẓālim under the Baḥrī Mamlūks 662/1264–789/1387. Leiden, The Netherlands: Niederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.Google Scholar
Nubola, Cecilia (2001) “Supplications between Politics and Justice: The Northern and Central Italian States in the Early Modern Age.” International Review of Social History 46, Suppl. 9: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Steve (2000) The Politics of Regicide in England: 1760–1850: Troublesome Subjects. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ooms, Herman (1996) Tokugawa Village Practice: Class, Status, Power, Law. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ormrod, W. Mark (2009) “Introduction: Medieval Petitions in Context,” in Ormrod, Mark W., Dodd, Gwilym, and Musson, Anthony (eds.) Medieval Petitions: Grace and Grievance. London: Boydell & Brewer: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Paul A. (2001) “‘And Your Petitioners & c’: Chartist Petitioning in Popular Politics, 1838-1848.” English Historical Review 116: 368–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestwich, Michael (1997) Edward I. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rabbat, Nasser O. (1995) “The Ideological Significance of the Dār Al-Adl in the Medieval Islamic Orient.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 27: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinmuth, Oskar W. (1979) The Prefect of Egypt from Augusts to Diocletian. Aalen, Germany: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar
Richards, D. S., trans. (2002 [c. 1233]) The Annals of the Seljuk Turks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Luke S. (1994) “The Petition Box in Eighteenth-Century Tosa.” Journal of Japanese Studies 20: 423–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustow, Marina (2010) “A Petition to a Woman at the Fatimid Court (413-414 A.H./1022-23 C.E.).” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 73: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahai, Nandita Prasad (2006) Politics of Patronage and Protest: The State, Society, and Artisans in Early Modern Rajasthan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, Richard P. (2002) Personal Patronage under the early Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sang-kwŏn, Han (1998) “The Development of the Petition System in the Age of Chosŏn.” Seoul Journal of Korean Studies 11: 107–25.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sippel, Patricia (1998) “Abandoned Fields: Negotiating Taxes in the Bakufu domaink.” Monumenta Nipponica 53: 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohrabi, Nader (1999) “Revolution and State Culture,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 253–88.Google Scholar
Stern, Samuel M. (1962) “Three Petitions of the Fāţimid Period.” Oriens 15: 172–209.Google Scholar
Stern, Samuel M. (1964) “Petitions from the Ayyūbid Period.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 27: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Samuel M. (1966) “Petitions from the Mamlūk Period.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 29: 233–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Devin J. (1996) “The First Shaykh al-Islām of the Safavid Capital Qavin.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 116: 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1994) Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Te Brake, Wayne P. (1988) “Violence in the Dutch Patriot Revolution.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 30: 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1998) Durable Inequality. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2006) Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2008) Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Mark, ed. (1995) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ursinus, Michael (2005) Grievance Administration (Şikayet) in an Ottoman Province: The Kaymakam of Rumelia’s “Record Book of Complaints” of 1781–1783. London and New York: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Van den Boorn, G. P. F. (1988) The Duties of the Vizier: Civil Administration in the Early New Kingdom. London and New York: Kegan International.Google Scholar
Van der Toorn, Karol (1996) Family Religion in Babylonia, Syria and Israel: Continuity and Change in the Forms of Religious Life. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Nierop, H. F. K. (1997) “Popular Participation in Politics in the Dutch Republic,” in Blickle, Peter (ed.) Resistance, Representation and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 272–90.Google Scholar
Van Voss, Lex Heerma (2001) “Introduction,” in Lex Heerma van Voss (ed.) Petitions in Social History. International Review of Social History 46, Suppl. 9: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verner, Andrew (1995) “Discursive Strategies in the 1905 Revolution.” The Russian Review 54: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Stephen (1990) Peasant Protests and Uprisings in Tokugawa Japan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walter, John (2006) Crowds and Popular Politics in Early Modern England. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Walthall, Anne (1986) Social Protest and Popular Culture in Eighteenth-Century Japan. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Ian (2006) “Administration, Law, and Culture in Merovingian Gaul,” in Noble, Thomas F. X. (ed.) From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. New York: Routledge: 358–75.Google Scholar
Würgler, Andreas (2001) “Voices from among the ‘Silent Masses’: Humble Petitions and Social Conflicts in Early Modern Central Europe,” in Lex Heerma van Voss (ed.) Petitions in Social History. International Review of Social History 46, Suppl. 9: 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Eunjeong (2004) Guild Dynamics in Seventeenth-Century Istanbul. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaeske, Susan (2003) Signatures of Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery, and Women’s Political Identity. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Zaret, David (2000) Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaret, David (2009) “Petitioning Places and the Credibility of Opinion in the Public Sphere in Seventeenth-Century England,” in Kümin, Beat (ed.) Political Space in Pre-industrial Europe. Farnham, UK: Ashgate: 175–96.Google Scholar
Zarinebaf-Sharh, Fariba (1997) “Ottoman Women and the Tradition of Seeking Justice in the Eighteenth Century,” in Zilfi, Madeline C. (ed.) Women in the Ottoman Empire: Middle Eastern Women in the Early Modern Era. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill: 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar