Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:34:36.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Politics of Time: The Political Origins of Working-Time Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Magnus Bergli Rasmussen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of South-Eastern Norway - Campus Drammen, Drammen, Norge

Abstract

Towards the end of the nineteenth century, leisure was reserved for the few. By the end of the twentieth century, however, most workers had a regulated normal working time of 40 or fewer hours per week, annual paid leave, and overtime compensation. In this paper, I investigate which political parties brought forth these changes – which party constellations supported or opposed working-time reforms and argue that sector and class differences drive party preferences. Lower-class and urban middle-class workers demanded regulation as demand for leisure increased with income. In contrast, employers and farmers opposed such reforms. Accordingly, the study argues that socialist and social-liberal parties were inclined to support leisure-securing working-time reforms, whereas conservative and farmer parties opposed them. Due to their linkages with workers and farmers, liberal parties may be divided into a rural constituency that tends to oppose working-time reforms and an urban constituency that supports them. I test these expectations using parliamentary data: 65 roll-call votes from Norway between 1880 and 1940, combined with analysis of major reforms and legislative appeals. Finally, I undertake a generalization test using country-level reform data from 33 democracies between 1880 and 2010. Results generally fall in line with expectations, and the pattern is stable over time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasland, T. (1961) Fra Arbeiderorganisasjon Til Mellomparti. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Alesina, A.F., Glaeser, E.L., and Sacerdote, B. (2005) “Work and leisure in the US and Europe: Why so different?NBER Macroeconomics Annual (20): 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, J.P., and Scruggs, L. (2004) “Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allern, E.H. (2010) Political Parties and Interest Groups in Norway. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., and Poschke, M. (2011) “Structural change out of agriculture: Labor push versus labor pull.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (3): 127–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2018) “Policy entrepreneurs and the origins of the regulatory welfare state: Child labor reform in nineteenth-century Europe.” American Sociological Review (83): 173211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardanaz, M., and Mares, I. (2014) “Labor shortages, rural inequality, and democratization.” Comparative Political Studies (47): 1639–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, P. (1990) The Politics of Social Solidarity: The Class Basis of the European Welfare State 1875–1975. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, E. (2019) “The Swedish Sonderweg in question: Democratization and inequality in comparative perspective, c. 1750–1920.” Past and Present (244): 123–61.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, E., and Molinder, J. (2017) “The economic effects of the 1920 eight-hour working day reform in Sweden.” Scandinavian Economic History Review (65): 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, S. (2006) The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, G., and Lehndorff, S. (2001) “Working-time reduction and employment: Experiences in Europe and economic policy recommendations.” Cambridge Journal of Economics (25): 209–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botero, J.C., Djankov, S., Porta, R.L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2004) “The regulation of labor.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (119): 1339–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, B., and Baxandall, P. (2004) “Three worlds of working time: The partisan and welfare politics of work hours in industrialized countries.” Politics and Society (32): 439–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, B., and Raess, D. (2009) “Globalization and working time: Working hours and flexibility in Germany.” Politics and Society (37): 554–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compston, H. (2001) “Social partnership, welfare state regimes and working time in Europe,” in Ebbinghaus, B. and Manow, P. (eds.) Comparing Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. New York: Routledge: 125–45.Google Scholar
Costa, D.L. (2000) “The wage and the length of the work day: From the 1890s to 1991.” Journal of Labor Economics (18): 156–81.Google Scholar
Cottini, E., and Lucifora, C. (2013) “Mental health and working conditions in Europe.” ILR Review (66): 958–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, G. (1985) “Les trois huits: Labor movements, international reform, and the origins of the eight-hour day, 1919–1924.” French Historical Studies (14): 240–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Danielsen, R. (1964) Det Norske storting gjennom 150 år, Bind 2: tidsrommet 1870–1908. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
De Sio, L., and Weber, T. (2014) “Issue yield: A model of party strategy in multidimensional space.” American Political Science Review (108): 870–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokument 1 (1936) Forskjellige forestillinger angående lovforslaget om tilsyn med arbeid (lov om arbeidervern). Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Dokument 1 (1939) Uttalelser angående lov om arbeidstiden på skib (jfr. ot.prp.nr. 63, 1938). Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Dokument 13 (1909) Fra socialkomiteen. utdalelser angaaende udkastet til ny fabriktilsynslov. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Dokument 49 (1915) Angående lov om arbeiderbeskyttelse I industrielle virksomheter. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, P. (2014) The Power to Dismiss: Trade Unions and the Regulation of Job Security in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, H. (1978) “World market, state, and family farm: Social bases of household production in the era of wage labor.” Comparative Studies in Society and History (20): 545–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J. (2006) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Golden, L. (2009) “A brief history of long work time and the contemporary sources of overwork.” Journal of Business Ethics (84): 217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.R., and Todaro, M.P. (1970) “Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis.” American Economic Review (60): 126–42.Google Scholar
Häusermann, S., Picot, G., and Geering, D. (2013) “Rethinking party politics and the welfare state: Recent advances in the literature.” British Journal of Political Science (43): 221–40.Google Scholar
Hicks, A., Misra, J., and Ng, T.N. (1995) “The programmatic emergence of the social security state.” American Sociological Review (60): 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E., and Stephens, J.D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, M. (2004) “Working hours of the world unite? New international evidence of worktime, 1870–1913.” Journal of Economic History (64): 9641001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, M. (2012) Odd Couple: International Trade and Labor Standards in History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huberman, M., and Lewchuk, W. (2003) “European economic integration and the labour compact, 1850–1913.” European Review of Economic History (7): 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, M., and Minns, C. (2007) “The times they are not changin’: Days and hours of work in Old and New Worlds, 1870–2000.” Explorations in Economic History (44): 538–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innst. O. I (1939) Innstilling fra den forsterkede socialkomite om lov om arbeidstiden på skib. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Innst. O. VI (1936) Innstilling fra socialkomiteen angående lov om arbeidervern. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Indst. O. IX (1909) Tillægsindstilling fra socialkomiteen angaaende lov om tilsyn med arbeide i fabriker m.v. Indst O. XIV 1908 og Dokument 13 med tillæg for 1909. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Indst. O. XXXII (1915) Indstilling fra den forsterkede socialkomite angaaende kongelige proposition om lov om arbeiderbeskyttelse i industrielle virksomheder. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., Rosenbluth, F.M., and Skorge, Ø. (2020) “The dilemma of gender equality: How labor market regulation divides women by class.” Daedalus (149): 8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T., and Soskice, D. (2006). “Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others.” American Political Science Review (100): 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersbergen, K., and Manow, P., eds. (2009) Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, C.H., and Rasmussen, M.B. (2020) “Majoritarian systems, rural groups, and (arrested) welfare state development.” International Political Science Review (41): 238–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (2006) “Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: Protagonists, consenters, and antagonists.” World Politics (58): 167206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W., and Palme, J. (2003) “New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–1995”, American Political Science Review, 97 (3): 425446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W.A. (1954) “Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour.” Manchester School (22): 139–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luebbert, G.M. (1991) Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. (2006) Age in the welfare state: The origins of social spending on pensioners, workers, and children. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, P. (2009) “Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping Andersen with Stein Rokkan.” Socio-Economic Review (7): 101–21.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2003) Politics of Social Risk Business and Welfare State Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, C.J., and Swank, D. (2012) The political construction of business interests: Coordination, growth, and equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, J.C., Lee, S., and McCann, D. (2007) Working Time around the World: Trends in Working Hours, Laws, and Policies in a Global Comparative Perspective. Geneva: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, D., Hansen, K., and Charlwood, A. (2001) “Unions and the sword of justice: Unions and pay systems, pay inequality, pay discrimination and low pay.” National Institute Economic Review (176): 6175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, W.C., and Strøm, K. (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijhuis, D.O. (2020) Business Interests and the Development of the Modern Welfare State. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norwegian Center for Research (2020) Politiker arkivet [dataset]. https://nsd.no/polsys/storting/politikerarkiv1814.html (accessed October 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Owen, J.D. (1971) “The demand for leisure.” Journal of Political Economy (79): 5676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ot. prp. 14 (19061907) Angaaende ufærdigelse av en lov om tilsyn med arbeide i fabriker. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Ot. prp. 31 (1935) Om å Utferdige en lov om tilsyn med arbeid. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Ot. prp. 35 (1914). Om utfærdigelse av Lov om arbeiderbeskyttelse i industrielle virksomheter. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Ot. prp. 63 (1938) Om lov om arbeidstiden på Skib. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996) “The new politics of the welfare state.” World Politics (48): 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribble, J. (2013) Welfare and party politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A., and Sprague, J. (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M.B. (2016) How Organized Labor Shaped the Origin and Structure of the Regulatory Revolution 1870-2000. Forlaget Politica. Politicas ph.d.-serie, http://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/ph.d.-afhandlinger/magnus_rasmussen.pdf Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M.B. (2022) “Farmers and the origin of the welfare state: Evidence from 308 roll call votes between 1882 and 1940.Scandinavian Political Studies (45): 202–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, M.B., and Knutsen, C.H. (2022) Reforming to Survive: The Bolshevik Origins of Social Policies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M.B., and Pontusson, J. (2018) “Working-class strength by institutional design? Unionization, partisan politics, and unemployment insurance systems, 1870 to 2010.” Comparative Political Studies (51): 793828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennwald, L., and Pontusson, H.J. (2020) “Paper stones revisited: Class voting, unionization and the electoral decline of the mainstream left.” Perspectives on Politics (19): 3654.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1987) Stat, nasjon, klasse. Oslo: Universitetsforslaget.Google Scholar
Sanne, C. (1998) “The working hours issue in Sweden.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research (4): 715–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, J., and Gerring, J. (2008) “Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options.” Political Research Quarterly (61): 294308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorge, Ø.S., and Rasmussen, M.B. (2021) “Volte-face on the welfare state: Social partners, knowledge economies, and the expansion of work-family policies.” Politics and Society 50 (2): 222254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stortingstidene (1909) Forhandlinger i stortinget. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Stortingstidene (1915) Forhandlinger i stortinget. Oslo: Stortinget.Google Scholar
Swenson, P. (2002) Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (2002) The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Western, B. (1991) “A comparative study of corporatist development.” American Sociological Review (56): 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, H.L. (1961) “The uneven distribution of leisure: The impact of economic growth on ‘free time’.” Social Problems (9): 3256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rasmussen supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Rasmussen supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 519.6 KB