Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T00:20:51.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Problem” of Interdisciplinarity in Theory, Practice, and History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Harvey J. Graff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interdisciplinarity is among the most talked about but most misunderstood topics in education on all levels today. Seen as the savior of research and teaching, especially in universities, and of society, or the seeds of destruction, interdisciplinarity's proponents and critics talk past each other. Seldom do they seek common terms; typically, they mean very different approaches when they refer to interdisciplinarity. They erroneously dichotomize disciplines and interdisciplines, confuse specialization and synthesis, and misconstrue “integration.” They also date the historical turn to interdisciplinarity too late. This article critically reviews the history, historiography, and sociology of knowledge of interdisciplinarity with a focus on etiology, epistemology, definitions, relationships among and between disciplines, intellectual and institutional locations, and the organization of knowledge. A new, more historical approach to the “problem” of interdisciplinarity is proposed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , Winter 2016 , pp. 775 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, Andrew (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aronowitz, Stanley (2000) The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Timothy R., Rauch, Alan, Blau, Herbert, Yudice, George, van DenBerg, Sara, Robinson, Lillian S., Henkel, Jacqueline, Murray, Timothy, Schoenfield, Mark, Traub, Valerie, and de Marco Torgovnick, Marianna (1996) “Defining interdisciplinarity.” PMLA 111 (2): 271–72.Google Scholar
Bok, Derek (2013) Higher Education in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brint, Steven (2001) “Professionals and the ‘knowledge economy’: Rethinking the theory of postindustrial society.” Current Sociology 49 (4): 101–32.Google Scholar
Brint, Steven (2002) “The rise of the ‘practical arts,’ in Brint, Steven (ed.) The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 61–89.Google Scholar
Brint, Steven (2005) “Creating the future: ‘New directions’ in American research universities.” Minerva 43: 23–50.Google Scholar
Brint, Steven, Riddle, Mark, Turk-Bicakci, Lori, and Levy, Charles S. (2005) “From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change.” Journal of Higher Education 76: 151–80.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (2000) “The specificity of American higher education.” Comparative Social Research 19: 48–81.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (2006) “The university and the public good.” Thesis Eleven 84: 7–43.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles Neil Gross, and Lamont, Michele, eds. (2011) Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin (1986) “Scholarly disciplines breaking out.” New York Times, April 25.Google Scholar
CERI (1972) “General conclusions,” in Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, report based the results of a Seminar on Interdisciplinarity in Universities, organized by CERI in Collaboration with the French Ministry of Education at the University of Nice, Sept 7–12, 1970: 285.Google Scholar
Change (2007) The Path to Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Change 36 (6): special issue.Google Scholar
Chronicle of Higher Education (2007) “Institutionalizing interdisciplinary study,” January 30.Google Scholar
Chronicle of Higher Education (2008a) University of Minnesota advertisement, May 2.Google Scholar
Chronicle of Higher Education (2008b) Claremont Graduate University advertisement, October 31.Google Scholar
Committee on a New Biology for the 21st Century (2009) Ensuring the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution, Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council, A New Biology for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Crow, Michael, Frodeman, Robert, Guston, David, Mitcham, Carl, Sarewitz, Daniel, and Zachary, G. Pascal (2013) The Rightful Place of Science: Politics. Tempe: Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard J. (2007) “A grand unified theory of interdisciplinarity.” Chronicle of Higher Education, June 8.Google Scholar
De Mey, Marc (1982) The Cognitive Paradigm: Cognitive Science, a Newly Explored Approach to the Study of Cognition Applied in an Analysis of Science and Scientific Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei, and Pahre, Robert (1990) Creative Marginalization: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, David (2010) The Lab: Creativity and Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1989) “Being interdisciplinary is so very hard to do.” Profession 89 (MLA): 15–22.Google Scholar
Fisher, Donald (1988) “Boundary work: A model of the relation between power and knowledge.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 10: 156–76.Google Scholar
Frank, Roberta (1988) “‘Interdisciplinarity’: The first half-century,” in Stanley, E. G. and Hoad, T. F. (eds.) Words for Robert Burchfield's Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Woodbridge, UK: D. S. Brewer: 91–101.Google Scholar
Frodeman, Robert (2014) Sustainable Knowledge: A Theory of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frodeman, Robert, Klein, Julie Thompson, and Mitcham, Carl, eds. (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steven (2003) “Interdisciplinarity: The loss of the heroic vision in the marketplace of ideas.” October 1, 2003, http://www.academia.edu/1161664/Rethinking_Interdisciplinarity, 1.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter (1992) “The many faces of big science,” in Galison, Peter and Hevly, Bruce (eds.) Big Science: The Growth of Large Scale Research. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 1–17.Google Scholar
Gershon, Diane (2000) “Laying a firm foundation for interdisciplinary research endeavours.” Nature 406: 107–8.Google Scholar
Gieryn Thomas, F. (1983) “Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.” American Sociological Review 48: 781–95.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander (2000) The Fortunes of the Humanities: Teaching the Humanities in the New Millennium. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. (2001) “The shock of the ‘“new” histories’: Social science histories and historical literacies,” Presidential Address, Social Science History Association, 2000, Social Science History 25 (1): 483–533.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. (2011) “LiteracyStudies@OSU as theory and practice,” in Graff, Harvey J. (ed.). Literacy Myths, Legacies, and Lessons: New Studies on Literacy. New Brunswick: Transaction: 141–78.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. (2015) Undisciplining Knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Jardine, Lisa (1986) From Humanism to the Humanities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guillory, John (2002) “The Sokal affair and the history of criticism.” Critical Inquiry 28: 470–508.Google Scholar
Gusdorf, Georges (1977) “Past, present, and future in interdisciplinary research.” International Social Science Journal 29: 580–600.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, Heinz (1972) “Discipline and interdisciplinarity,” in Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, report based the results of a Seminar on Interdisciplinarity in Universities: 83–89.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan (2008) “Disciplines, intersections, and the future of communication research.” Journal of Communication 58: 605–6.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn (1997) “Democratization and decline? The consequences of democratic change in the humanities,” in Kerman, Alvin (ed.). What's Happened to the Humanities? Princeton: Princeton University Press: 17–31.Google Scholar
Inside Higher Education (2007) “‘Institutionalizing’ interdisciplinary research,” July 25.Google Scholar
Inside Higher Education (2013) “Study finds that Ph.D.s who write interdisciplinary dissertations earn less,” October 31.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jerry (2013) In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jerry A., and Frickel, Scott (2009) “Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 35: 43–65.Google Scholar
Katsouleas, Tom (2011) “A Convergence science for today's problems.” Chronicle of Higher Education, August 14.Google Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson (1996) Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson (1999). Crossing Boundaries; Mapping Interdisciplinary Studies: The Academy in Transition. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson (2005) Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity: The Changing American Academy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Julie Thompson (2010) Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures: A Model for Strength and Sustainability. Association of American Colleges and Universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michele (2009) How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latucca, Lisa R. (2001) Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Roderick J., and Després, Carole (2004) “Futures of transdisciplinarity.” Futures 36 (4): 397–405.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2009) Disciplines in the Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markin, Karen M. (2005) “So happy together.” Chronicle of Higher Education, November 25.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011) The Third Revolution: The Convergence of the Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Engineering. Washington, DC: MIT.Google Scholar
Matthiasson, John S. (1968) “My discipline is better than your discipline: Some barriers to interdisciplinary research.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 5: 263–75.Google Scholar
Menand, Louis (2010) The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Moran, Joe (2002) Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newfield, Christopher (2009) Unmaking the Public University: The Forty-Year Assault on the Middle Class. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolescu, Basarab (2002) Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, trans. Voss, Karen-Claire. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nissani, Moti (1995) “Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinarity.” Journal of Educational Thought 29: 121–28.Google Scholar
Nissani, Moti (1997) “Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research.” Social Science Journal 34: 201–16.Google Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone (2005) “Law, literature, and the vanishing real: On the future of an interdisciplinary illusion.” PMLA 120: 442–53.Google Scholar
Pfirman, Stephanie L., Collins, James P., Lowes, Susan, and Michaels, Anthony (2005) “Collaborative efforts: Promoting interdisciplinary scholars.” Chronicle of Higher Education, February 7.Google Scholar
Readings, Bill (1996) The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas (2013) “Nikolas Rose interviewed by Todd Meyers.” Public Culture 25: 435–52.Google Scholar
Salter, Liora, and Hearn, Alison, eds. (1996) Outside the Lines: Issues in Interdisciplinary Research. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (2004) “Interdisciplinarity in theory and practice,” in Camic, Charles and Joas, Hans (eds.) The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield: 43–64.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (2011) “An experiment in interdisciplinarity: Proposals and promises,” in Camic, Charles, Gross, Neil, and Lamont, Michele (eds.) Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strober, Myra H. (2010) Interdisciplinary Conversations: Challenging Habits of Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Torgovnick, Marianna De Marco (1996) “Defining interdisciplinarity.” PMLA 111: 271–82.Google Scholar
Trow, Martin (1984–85) “Interdisciplinary studies as a counterculture: Problems of birth, growth and survival.” Issues in Integrative Studies 3: 1–16.Google Scholar
Turner, Steven (2000) “What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different?,” in Weingart, Peter and Stehr, Nico (eds.) Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto: 46–65.Google Scholar
University of Michigan News Service (2008) “Interdisciplinary faculty,” May 5.Google Scholar
Valenza, Robin (2009) Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, 1680–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Jeffrey (2006) “Expanding the I-Word.” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 20.Google Scholar
Weingart, Peter (2000) “Interdisciplinarity: The paradoxical discourse,” in Weingart, Peter and Stehr, Nico (eds.) Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 25–41.Google Scholar
Weingart, Peter, and Stehr, Nico, eds. (2000) Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar