Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Signatures of Social Structure: Petitioning for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in Manchester

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2019

Abstract

This article considers the problem of popular, collectively organized political action in the context of the abolition movement of the slave trade (1788–1807). Various primary sources, a petition, a trade directory, church records, and a self-built historic GIS are used to locate petitioners for abolition in the social fabric of Manchester. Through matching and computational experiments the article highlights which social structural forces led individuals to support the abolition movement by signing a petition. Specifically, gathering places that were historically involved in the movement, as well as those that housed traveling merchants from communities with successful abolitionist petitions from preceding campaigns shaped abolitionist petitioning—and the impact of these institutions remained important over and above family ties, active religious congregations, and the occupational groups. The article gives a new understanding of the role that early industrialization played in the abolition movement, building it from the bottom up, forging cohesion within and across communities through local institutions, rather than creating new boundaries and divides through processes of class formation.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

I thank Peter Bearman, Delia Baldassarri, Paul Chang, Seymour Drescher, Richard Huzzey, Byungkyu Lee, Henry Miller, Debra Minkoff, Sanaz Mobbasseri, Adam Reich, Peter Stamatov, Alix Winter, and Christopher Winship, along with the participants of the History, Culture and Society Workshop at Harvard University, and the participants of the Berkeley Mathematical, Analytical, and Experimental Sociology Working Group for valuable comments on prior drafts. The work was supported by the NSF (#1435138). The usual disclaimers apply.

References

Abbott, Andrew (1988) “Transcending General Linear Reality.Sociological Theory 6 (2): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, Weihua (2011) “Models and Methods to Identify Peer Effects,” in Scott, John and Carrington, Peter J. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications: 514–32.Google Scholar
Anstey, Roger (1972a) “A Re-Interpretation of the Abolition of the British Slave Trade, 1806–1807.The English Historical Review (87): 304–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, Roger (1972b) “Capitalism and Slavery: A Critique.The Economic History Review (21): 307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, Roger (1976) The Atlantic Slave Trade and British Abolition 1760–1810. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, John (1992) “Capitalism, Class and Antislavery,” in Bender, Thomas (ed.) The Antislavery Debate: Capitalism and Abolitionism as a Problem in Historical Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press: 263–89.Google Scholar
Aspinall, Arthur (1946) “The Circulation of Newspapers in the Early Nineteenth Century.The Review of English Studies (22): 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, Peter (1991) “Desertion as Localism: Army Unit Solidarity and Group Norms in the U.S. Civil War.Social Forces (70): 321–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Peter M. (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, John (1986) The Common People and Politics 1750–1790. Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey.Google Scholar
Brown, Christopher L. (2006) Moral Capital: Foundations of British Abolitionism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (2012) The Roots of Radicalism: Tradition, the Public Sphere and Early Nineteen-Century Social Movements. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel (2014) “When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Political Mobilization of American Women.American Political Science Review (108): 479–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, Elizabeth J., and Jeffrey, Julie Roy (2011) Women, Dissent and Anti-Slavery in Britain and America, 1790–1865. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Peter (1983) The English Alehouse: A Social History, 1200–1830. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Clark, Peter (2000) Title British Clubs and Societies, 1580–1800: The Origins of an Associational World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Thomas (1836) The History of the Rise, Progress, and Accomplishment of the Abolition of the African Slave-Trade, by the British Parliament. New York: John S. Taylor.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (2007) “Toward a Historicized Sociology: Theorizing Events, Processes, and Emergence.Annual Review of Sociology (33): 527–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, Linda (1992) Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, William R. (1994) “The Somerset Case and the Abolition of Slavery in England.History (79): 3156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Reginald (1923) Wilberforce: A Narrative. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
d’Anjou, Leo (1996) Social Movements and Cultural Change: The First Abolition Campaign Revisited. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion (1966) Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion (1975) The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion (1992) “Part 1: The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823,” in Bender, Thomas (ed.) The Antislavery Debate: Capitalism and Abolitionism as a Problem in Historical Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press: 15104.Google Scholar
Dean, R. W. (1807) Deans’ Manchester & Salford Directory for 1808 & 1809: Containing an Alphabetical List of the Merchants, Manufacturers, and Inhabitants in General … embellished with a New and Correct Map. Manchester, UK: R. & W. Dean.Google Scholar
Drescher, Seymour (1986) Capitalism and Antislavery: British Mobilization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, Seymour (1994) “Whose Abolition? Popular Pressure and the Ending of the British Slave Trade.Past and Present (143):136166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, Seymour ([1977] 2010) Econocide – British Slavery in the Era of Abolition. Chapel Hill: The University of North Caroline Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Emily, and Bearman, Peter (2006) “Malfeasance and the Foundations for Global Trade: The Structure of English Trade in the East Indies, 1601–1833.American Journal of Sociology (111): 195230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Emily, and Samila, Sampsa (2015) Social Networks and Port Traffic in Early-Modern Overseas Trade. Social Science History 39 (2): 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, Alan Milner (1973) “The English Urban Inn 1560–1760,” in Milner, Alan (ed.) Perspectives in English Urban History. London: Macmillan: 91137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Scott L. (1981) “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.American Journal of Sociology (86): 1015–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Roger (1993) “Trade Cohesion, Class Unity, and Urban Insurrection: Artisanal Activism in the Paris Commune.American Journal of Sociology (98): 721–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Roger (1995) Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Karen (2015) “Urban Innkeepers, Their Inns and Their Role in the Economic and Cultural Life of Leeds and York, 1720–1860.” Master’s Thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Grigoryeva, Angelina, and Ruef, Martin (2015) “The Historical Demography of Racial Segregation.American Sociological Review (83): 814–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hague, William (2007) William Wilberforce: The Life of the Great Anti-Slave Trade Campaigner. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L. (1992) “Capitalism and the Origins of the Humanitarian Sensibility, Part 1,” in Bender, Thomas (ed.) The Antislavery Debate: Capitalism and Abolitionism as a Problem in Historical Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press: 107–35.Google Scholar
Hedstrom, Peter, and Bearman, Peter (2009) “What Is Analytical Sociology All About? An Introductory Essay,” in Hedstrom, Peter and Bearman, Peter (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press: 514–32.Google Scholar
Hillmann, Henning (2008a) “Localism and the Limits of Political Brokerage: Evidence From Revolutionary Vermont.American Journal of Sociology (114):287331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillmann, Henning (2008b) “Mediation in Multiple Networks: Elite Mobilization Before the English Civil War.American Sociological Review (73):426454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Adam (2005) Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire’s Slaves. Boston and New York: A Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. M. (1977) “The Anti-Slave Trade Agitation in Manchester.” Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society (79): 4672.Google Scholar
Ingram, Paul, and Silverman, Brian S. (2016) “The Cultural Contingency of Structure: Evidence from Entry to the Slave Trade in and Around the Abolition Movement.American Journal of Sociology (122): 755–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennings, Judith (1997) The Business of Abolishing the British Slave Trade 1783–1807. Oxon, NY: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Jennings, Paul (2011) The Local: A History of the English Pub. Stroud, UK: The History Press.Google Scholar
Klingberg, Frank Joseph (1968 [1926]) The Anti-Slavery Movement in England: A Study in English Humanitarianism. Hamden, UK: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Liu, Kayuet, and Bearman, Peter S. (2015) “Focal Points, Endogenous Processes, and Exogenous Shocks in the Autism Epidemic.Sociological Methods and Research (44): 272305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Kayuet, King, Marissa, and Bearman, Peter (2010) “Social Influence and the Increased Prevalence of Autism Diagnosis.American Journal of Sociology (115): 13871434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug (1986) “Recruitment of High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.American Journal of Sociology (92): 6490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Paulsen, Ronnelle (1993) “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism.American Journal of Sociology (99): 640–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Miller, and Smith-Lovin, Lynn (1987) “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups.American Sociological Review (52): 370–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and James, M. Cook. (2001) “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.Annual Review of Sociology (27): 415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgley, Clare (1996) “Slave Sugar Boycotts, Female Activism and the Domestic Base of British Anti‐Slavery Culture.Slavery and Abolition (17): 137–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Money, John (1971) “Taverns, Coffee Houses and Clubs: Local Politics and Popular Articulacy in the Birmingham Area, in the Age of the American Revolution.The Historical Journal (14): 1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kenneth (2007) “Liverpool’s Dominance in the British Slave Trade, 1740–1807,” in Richardson, David, Schwarz, Suzanne, and Tibbles, Anthony (eds.) Liverpool and Transatlantic Slavery. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press: 1442.Google Scholar
Murtagh, Fionn, and Legendre, Pierre (2014) “Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion?Journal of Classification (31): 274–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony (1973) Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Oldfield, John R. (1995) Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery: The Mobilization of Public Opinion Against the Slave Trade 1787–1807. Manchester, UK, and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Parigi, Paolo, and Bergemann, Patrick (2016) “Strange Bedfellows: Informal Relationships and Political Preference Formation within Boardinghouses, 1825–1841.” Annual Journal of Sociology (122): 501–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Dale H. (1970) The Abolition of the Slave Trade in England, 1784–1807. Hamden, UK: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Quirk, Joel, and Richardson, David (2010) “Religion, Urbanisation and Anti-Slavery Mobilisation in Britain, 1787–1833.European Journal of English Studies (14): 263–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Gareth (1982) British Directories as Sources in Historical Geography. Norwich, UK: Geo Books.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Louis, A. Zurcher, and Ekland-Olson, Sheldon (1980) “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment.American Sociological Review (39): 787801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatov, Peter (2010) “Activist Religion, Empire, and the Emergence of Modern Long-Distance Advocacy Networks.American Sociological Review (75): 607–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatov, Peter (2013) The Origins of Global Humanitarianism: Religion, Empires, and Advocacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatov, Peter (2014) “Beyond and Against Capitalism: Abolitionism and the Moral Dimension of Humanitarian Practice.International Social Science Journal (65): 215–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Hugh (1997) The Slave Trade: The Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade 1440–1870. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1993) “Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834.Social Science History 17 (2): 253–80.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2005) Popular Contention in Great Britain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Joe H. (1963) “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function.Journal of the American Statistical Association (58): 236–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Eric (1994 [1944]) Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Winship, Christopher, and Morgan, Stephen L. (1999) “The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data.Annual Review of Sociology (25): 659706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makovi supplementary material

Makovi supplementary material 1

File 5 MB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 53
Total number of PDF views: 241 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th June 2019 - 19th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-9l59n Total loading time: 0.6 Render date: 2021-01-19T17:35:35.751Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Signatures of Social Structure: Petitioning for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in Manchester
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Signatures of Social Structure: Petitioning for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in Manchester
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Signatures of Social Structure: Petitioning for the Abolition of the Slave Trade in Manchester
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *