Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-mhx7p Total loading time: 0.451 Render date: 2022-05-26T19:06:02.423Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Use-Based Welfare: Property Experiments in Chicago, 1895–1935

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2019


Use-based welfare achieves redistribution by reallocating rights to use and benefit from idle resources, rather than through tax and transfer. How and why has this form of welfare provision emerged as an urban institution, and what affects whether it endures? This article compares projects to grant poor and unemployed Chicagoans access to land for gardens and small farms between 1895 and 1935, explaining how this form of social support came about through experiments with rules, norms, and forms of property. While social policy is typically understood as emerging through the realization of rights to public support, use-based welfare turns instead on efforts to create a legal privilege for the needy to use idle resources. During the Progressive Era and the Great Depression, this form of relief was pitched as both an alternative and a complement to welfare based on tax and transfer. Yet efforts to establish it as a permanent institution repeatedly failed, due to implementation challenges, opposition from people committed to treating land and food as commodities, and the nonemergence of a social movement to defend land access. Recognizing the historical dynamics of use-based welfare offers a new perspective on the contemporary resurgence of urban farming as a strategy for addressing unemployment and poverty.

Research Article
© Social Science History Association, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Versions of this paper were presented at the American Sociology Association Economic Sociology Section’s 2016 preconference workshop and at a 2017 ASA session on the welfare state. I am grateful for comments at those gatherings, as well as from participants in the Economic Sociology Workshop at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and the Boston College Environmental Sociology Working Group, and from the anonymous reviewers. Special thanks are due to Meghan Morris and Erik Olin Wright. This research has received support from the Social Science Research Council, the National Science Foundation, and the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.


“A city full of gardens.” Country Life in America, May 1916: 90–96, 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Association of commerce as garden chief.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 2, 1917.Google Scholar
“A use for vacant lots.” Chicago Daily Tribune, October 21, 1909.Google Scholar
“‘Back to the soil’ cure.” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 5, 1910.Google Scholar
“Business men aid garden idea.” Chicago Herald, March 23, 1917.Google Scholar
“Chicago considers land colonization plan.” New York Times, April 9, 1933.Google Scholar
“Chicago to be just one park after another.” Chicago Daily Tribune, November 27, 1919.Google Scholar
“City ‘farms’ for the poor.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 26, 1912.Google Scholar
“City idle must go to country: F. D. Roosevelt.” Chicago Daily Tribune, January 17, 1933.Google Scholar
“City urged to conscript lots for gardeners.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 18, 1917Google Scholar
“Demand very great for gardening space.” Chicago Post, April 18, 1917.Google Scholar
“Gardening in the garden city.” Chicago Daily Tribune, January 4, 1910.Google Scholar
“Gardens for the poor lesson to women.” Chicago Daily Tribune, October 20, 1909.Google Scholar
“Gardens get mayor’s room.” Chicago News, March 21, 1917.Google Scholar
“Gardens given to the poor.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 4, 1910.Google Scholar
“Harvester’s relief and garden plans.” Industrial Relations 3 (8): 398–402, August 1932.Google Scholar
“Job committee named by Hoover will meet today.” Chicago Daily Tribune, September 28, 1931.Google Scholar
“Lack of funds may end garden bureau.” Chicago Herald, May 15, 1917.Google Scholar
“Mass meeting gives gardens a big boost.” Chicago News, March 16, 1917.Google Scholar
“Mayor asks city heads to be farmers.” Chicago American, April 18, 1917.Google Scholar
“Motorcycles to aid gardens.” Chicago Journal, April 2, 1917.Google Scholar
“Order WPA staff geared up for rush of work.” Chicago Daily Tribune, September 14, 1935.Google Scholar
“Poor of city get 90 acres to till.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March 24, 1909.Google Scholar
“Plan gardens for jobless in county forests.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 20, 1932.Google Scholar
“Predicts riots.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 14, 1917.Google Scholar
“Sanitary body quick to vote small farms.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March 19, 1915.Google Scholar
“Start plowing 3,000 acres for relief gardens.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 6, 1932.Google Scholar
“The People’s Friendly Club.” Hull House Bulletin VII (1): 14 (1905–6).Google Scholar
“Toilers to farm empty city lots.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 15, 1912.Google Scholar
“Uses small farm to lure city people to country.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March 21, 1910.Google Scholar
“US facing famine, is warning.” Chicago American, April 4, 1917.Google Scholar
“World improves, says Kropotkin.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 18, 1901.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, and Alstott, Anne (2000) The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory (2009) “The social-obligation norm in American property law.” Cornell Law Review 94 (4): 745819.Google Scholar
Allard, Scott W., and Small, Mario L. (2013) “Reconsidering the urban disadvantaged: The role of systems, institutions, and organizations.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 647 (1): 620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Patricia (2008) “Mining for justice in the food system: Perceptions, practices, and possibilities.” Agriculture and Human Values 25 (2): 157161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelo, Hillary, and Wachsmuth, David (2015) “Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (1): 1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David (2012) “John Locke: Theorist of empire?,” in Muthu, Sankar (ed.) Empire and Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 84111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avrich, Paul (1980) “Kropotkin in America.” International Review of Social History 25 (1): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, Tim (2007) “Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, Jeremy (2002) The Allotment Movement in England, 17931873. London: The Royal Historical Society.Google Scholar
Bureau of Associated Charities (1898) Fourth Annual Report.Google Scholar
Bynner, John, and Despotidou, Sofia (2001) “The effects of assets on life chances.” London: Center for Longitudinal Studies, Institute for Education.Google Scholar
Bynner, John, and Paxton, Will (2001) The Asset-Effect. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Carroll, Charles E. (1912) “Industrial peace through social justice.” Master’s thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Cho, Esther Y. (1999) “The effects of assets on the economic well-being of women after marital disruption.” Center for Social Development Working Paper No. 99-6, Saint Louis, MO: Center for Social Development, Washington University in Saint Louis.Google Scholar
Cialdella, Joseph Stanhope (2014) “A landscape of ruin and repair: Parks, potatoes, and Detroit’s environmental past, 1879–1900.” Michigan Historical Review 40 (1): 4972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Chicago (2013) “A recipe for healthy places.”Google Scholar
City of Chicago (2014) “Green healthy neighborhoods.”Google Scholar
City of Chicago Data Portal (2016) “Census data: Selected socioeconomic indicators in Chicago, 2008–2012.”Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. (1960) “The problem of social cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colcord, Joanna C., and Johnston, Mary (1933) Community Programs for Subsistence Gardens. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, US House of Representatives (1921–22) Hearings on H.R. 9049, H.R. 8648, and S. 3177, Declaring Portions of the Chicago River to be Non-Navigable. 67th Cong., 2d Sess., December 15, 192l; May 19, 1922; October 6 and 7, 1922.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. (1893) The Distribution of Wealth. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cook County Subsistence Garden Service (1935) Annual Report 1934. February 7.Google Scholar
Cronon, William (1983) Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Cronon, William (1991) Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dauber, Michele Landis (2013) The Sympathetic State: Disaster Relief and the Origins of the American Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davis, H. G. (1933) “Peasantry.” Chicago Daily Tribune, February 14.Google Scholar
de Soto, Hernando (2000) The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Dodd, William E. (1933) “Back-to-the-land?,” Chicago Daily Tribune, March 19.Google Scholar
Drake, St. Clair, and Caton, Horace R. (2015 [1945]) Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in a Northern City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, Jennifer, Martin, Andrew, McCarthy, John D., and Soule, Sarah A. (2004) “The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ela, Nate (2016) “Urban commons as property experiment: Mapping Chicago’s farms and gardens.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 43 (2): 247–94.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa (1997) “Manifesto for a relational sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Anderson, Gosta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, W. A. (1913) “Farming in the city.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 25.Google Scholar
Evans, W. A. (1915) “How to keep well.” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 25.Google Scholar
Fels, Mary (1920) Joseph Fels: His Life-Work. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Finegold, Kenneth (1988) “Agriculture and the politics of US social provision: Social insurance and food stamps,” in Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 88122.Google Scholar
Flyvberg, Bent (2006) “Five misunderstandings about case-study research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Cybelle (2010) “Three worlds of relief: Race, immigration, and public and private social welfare spending in American cities, 1929.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (2): 453502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, Mari (2006) “Examining the impact of food deserts on public health in Chicago.” Chicago: Mari Gallagher Research and Consulting Group.Google Scholar
Gardener, Virginia (1935) “Speed planting in 900 acres of relief gardens.” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 1.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Paul T. (1914) “Vacant lot gardening.” Western Christian Advocate, September 16.Google Scholar
Green, James (2006) Death in the Haymarket. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert Lee (1923) “Coercion and distribution in a supposedly non-coercive state.” Political Science Quarterly 38: 470–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Bolton (1908) A Little Land and a Living. New York: Arcadia Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, L.A. (n.d.) “Harvester employee garden project.” Wisconsin Historical Society, McCormick-International Harvester collection, Box 738.Google Scholar
Haydu, Jeffery (1998) “Making use of the past: Time periods as cases to compare and as sequences of problem solving.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (2): 339–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbard, Benjamin Horace (1933) “Back to the land?,” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 18.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley (1913) “Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning.” Yale Law Journal 23 (4): 1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, P. G. (1917) “Gardens on vacant lots could feed half of city.” Chicago Examiner, March 7.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha C. (2017) Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyn, and Stephens, John D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Henry M. (1913) “Sample gardens in public parks for city ‘farmer.’” Chicago Daily Tribune, October 3.Google Scholar
Hyde, Henry M. (1915a) “Plans to put idle on farms are under way.” Chicago Daily Tribune, February 18.Google Scholar
Hyde, Henry M. (1915b) “Sanitary body quick to vote small farms.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March 19.Google Scholar
Illinois Action for Children (2016) “Key indicators of need for Chicago communities,” (accessed July 6, 2018).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas (1986 [1785]) Letter to James Madison, October 28, 1785, in Kurland, Philip B. and Lerner, Ralph (eds.) The Founders’ Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Jens (1990 [1939]) Siftings. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael B. (1996) In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kinsley, Philip (1931) “Jobs not dole, slogan as Hoover group debates relief measures in Chicago.” Chicago Daily Tribune, September 29.Google Scholar
Kinsley, Philip (1933) “General Bolles offers plan for retreat to land.” Chicago Daily Tribune, February 10.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pëtr (1912 [1898]) Fields, Factories and Workshops. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons.Google Scholar
Lawson, Laura J. (2005) City Bountiful: A Century of Community Gardening in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley (1948) “Labor force, employment, and unemployment 1929-39: Estimating methods.” Monthly Labor Review 67 (1): 5053.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra (2014) Caring for Our Own: Why There Is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1980 [1690]) Second Treatise of Government, Macpherson, C. B. (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Logan, John, and Molotch, Harvey (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lyson, Helena C. (2014) “Social structural location and vocabularies of participation: Fostering a collective identity in urban agriculture activism.” Rural Sociology 79 (3): 310–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandell, Nikki (2002) The Corporation as Family: The Gendering of Corporate Welfare, 1890–1930. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Marwell, Nicole (2004) “Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors.” American Sociological Review 69 (2): 265–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl (1975 [1842]) “Proceedings of the sixth Rhine province assembly. Third article. Debates on the law on thefts of wood,” in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. 1. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
McClintock, Nathan (2013) “Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: Coming to terms with urban agriculture’s contradictions.” Local Environment 19 (2): 147–71 doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.752797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Cyrus Jr (1932) “Productive gardens for the unemployed.” House and Garden 63 (6): 5253, 63–64.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald (1932) “It’s harvest time for Chicago’s new army of city farmers.” Sunday Illustrated Times, October 9.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Dale T. (1988) “Matching: Finding a partner for life or otherwise.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): S215S240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, Micheline (2014) The Working Man’s Green Space: Allotment Gardens in England, France, and Germany, 1870–1919. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Julia S., Orloff, Ann Shola, and Shaver, Sheila (1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism, and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelham, Laura Dainty (1909) “The Chicago City Gardens Association.” The Survey: Social, Charitable, Civic 22 (1): 423–25.Google Scholar
Pingree, H. S. (1895) “Food for the poor.” Chicago Daily Tribune, April 1Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. (1977) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How they Fail. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (2014) The Economic Analysis of Law, 9th ed. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Potter, Paul (1931) “Home gardens again Favored as in war daysChicago Daily Tribune, May 3, p. A11.Google Scholar
President’s Organization on Unemployment Relief (1931) Press Release, October 29; reproduced in Monthly Labor Review 33 (6): 77–78.Google Scholar
Price, C. W. (1907) Outline of talk on “Opportunity for recreation and social life” at Chicago Institute of Social Science, April 15. Wisconsin Historical Society, McCormick-International Harvester collection.Google Scholar
Reider, Edith S. (1915) “With our Harvester gardeners.” Harvester World 6 (3): 23.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M. (1995) Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sanitary District of Chicago (1906) Proceedings of the Board of Trustees, March 14.Google Scholar
Satter, Beryl (2009) Family Properties: Race, Real Estate, and the Exploitation of Black Urban America. New York: Metropolitan.Google Scholar
Sherraden, Michael (1991) Assets and the Poor: A New American Welfare Policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph (2000) “Property and social relations: From title to entitlement,” in Geisler, Charles and Daneker, Gail (eds.) Property and Values: Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership. Washington, DC: Island Press: 319.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph (2001) The Edges of the Field: Lessons on the Obligations of Ownership. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Small, Mario Luis (2006) “Neighborhood institutions as resource brokers: Childcare centers, interorganizational ties, and resource access among the poor.” Social Problems 53 (2): 274–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Mario Luis (2007) “Is there such a thing as ‘the ghetto’?City 11 (3): 413–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. (2012) “Property as the law of things.” Harvard Law Review 125 (7): 16911726.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven, and Lipsky, Michael (1995) Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) “Social norms and social roles.” Columbia Law Review 96 (4): 903–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, William I., and Znaniecki, Florian (1920) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, Volume V: Organization and Disorganization in America. Boston: Richard D. Badger.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce (1932) “Subsistence Gardens.”Google Scholar
Urban Farm Pathways Project (2015) “Englewood community farms prospectus and business plan,” (accessed July 6, 2018).Google Scholar
Voicu, Ioan, and Been, Vicki (2008) “The effect of community gardens on neighboring property values.” Real Estate Economics 36 (2): 241–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walley, Christine J. (2013) Exit Zero: Family and Class in Postindustrial Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (2001 [1930]) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (1988) “Understanding American social politics,” in Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 327.Google Scholar
West Chicago Park Commissioners (1920) A Greater West Park System: After the Plans of Jens Jensen. Chicago: West Park Commission.Google Scholar
White, Monica M. (2011) “Sisters of the soil: Urban gardening as resistance in Detroit.” Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 5 (1): 1328.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond (1973) The Country and the City. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel H. (2018) “Seven ways to compute the relative value of a US dollar amount, 1774 to present,” (accessed July 3, 2018).Google Scholar
Winstanley, Gerrard (1649) “The true levellers standard advanced: Or, the state of community opened, and presented to the sons of men,” (accessed July 3, 2018).Google Scholar
Wolford, Wendy (2007) “Land reform in the time of neoliberalism: A many-splendored thing.” Antipode 39 (3): 550–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Arthur (1801) An Inquiry into the Propriety of Applying Wastes to the Better Maintenance and Support of the Poor. Angel Hill, UK: J. Rackham.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Use-Based Welfare: Property Experiments in Chicago, 1895–1935
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Use-Based Welfare: Property Experiments in Chicago, 1895–1935
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Use-Based Welfare: Property Experiments in Chicago, 1895–1935
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *