Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:08:56.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Pure Milk Is Better Than Purified Milk”

Pasteurization and Milk Purity in Chicago, 1908-1916

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Abstract

This article explains how pasteurization—with few outspoken political supporters during this period—first became a primary milk purification strategy in Chicago and why eight years passed between pasteurization’s initial introduction into law and the city’s adoption of full mandatory pasteurization. It expands the current focus on the political agreement to pasteurize to include the organizational processes involved in incorporating pasteurization into both policy and practice. It shows that the decision to pasteurize did not occur at a clearly defined point but instead evolved over time as a consequence of the interplay of political interest groups, state-municipal legal relations, and the merging of different organizational practices. Such an approach considerably complicates and expands existing accounts of how political interests and agreements shaped pasteurization and milk purification policies and practice.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew (2001) Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
American Association of Medical Milk Commissions (AAMMC) (1907) Proceedings of the First Conference of the Medical Milk Commissions in the United States. Cincinnati, OH: American Association of Medical Milk Commissions.Google Scholar
American Association of Medical Milk Commissions (AAMMC) (1908) Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the American Association of Medical Milk Commissions. Cincinnati, OH: American Association of Medical Milk Commissions.Google Scholar
American Association of Medical Milk Commissions (AAMMC) (1909) Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the American Association of Medical Milk Commissions: Held at the St. Charles Hotel, Atlantic City, New Jersey, Monday, June 17, 1909. Cincinnati, OH: American Association of Medical Milk Commissions.Google Scholar
American Association of Medical Milk Commissions (AAMMC) (1910) Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference of the Medical Milk Commissions, with a Manual of the Working Methods and Standards. St. Louis, MO: American Association of Medical Milk Commissions.Google Scholar
Apple, Rima D. (1980) “‘To be used only under the direction of a physician’: Commercial infant feeding and medical practice, 1870-1940.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 54: 402–17.Google Scholar
Block, Daniel Ralston (1999) “Purity, economy, and social welfare in the Progressive Era milk movement.” Journal for the Study of Food and Society 3: 2027.Google Scholar
Block, Daniel Ralston (2002) “Protecting and connecting: Separation, connection, and the U.S. dairy economy, 1840-2002.” Journal for the Study of Food and Society 6: 2230.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chicago Department of Health (1919) Report and Handbook of the Department of Health of the City of Chicago for the Years 1911 to 1918 Inclusive. Chicago: House of Severinghaus.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1909a) “Chicago must pay for model milk.” January 20.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1909b) “City bars milk with state OK.” February 19.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1909c) “Differ on safety of ‘Pasteur Milk.’” February 17.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1909d) “Fires a new shot at state board.” February 26.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1909e) “Pasteurized milk lauded by Evans.” February 4.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (1909f) “Price of milk is advanced.” February 27.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. (1972) “A garbage can model of institutional choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 125.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Kruif, Paul (1926) Microbe Hunters. New York: Blue Ribbon Books.Google Scholar
Duffy, John (1990) The Sanitarians: A History of American Public Health. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
DuPuis, E. Melanie (2002) Nature’s Perfect Food: How Milk Became America’s Drink. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, Sydney A. (1988) American Pediatrics: The Social Dynamics of Professionalism, 1880-1980. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Illinois General Assembly (1912) Evidence Taken before the Joint Committee on the Tuberculin Test, 1911. Springfield: Illinois State Journal Company.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M. (1998) “The theoretical core of the new institutionalism.” Politics and Society 26: 534.Google Scholar
Infant Welfare Society (1903) “Minutes (June 7, 1903).” Infant Welfare Society Papers, Chicago Historical Society, box 1, folder 7.Google Scholar
Infant Welfare Society (1904) “Yearly report, 1903-1904.” Infant Welfare Society Papers, Chicago Historical Society, box 1, folder 6.Google Scholar
Klaus, Alisa (1993) Every Child a Lion: The Origins of Maternal and Infant Health Policy in the United States and France, 1890-1920. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
La Berge, Ann F. (1991) “Mother and infants, nurses and nursing: Alfred Donné and the medicalization of childcare [sic] in nineteenth-century France.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 46: 2043.Google Scholar
Levenstein, Harvey (1983) “‘Best for babies’ or ‘preventable infanticide’? The controversy over artificial feeding of infants in America, 1880-1920.” Journal of American History 70: 7594.Google Scholar
McClary, Andrew (1979) “Germs are everywhere: The germ threat as seen in magazine articles, 1890-1920.” Journal of American Culture 3: 3346.Google Scholar
Olmstead, Alan L., and Rhode, Paul W. (2004a) “An impossible undertaking: The eradication of bovine tuberculosis in the United States.” Journal of Economic History 64: 734–72.Google Scholar
Olmstead, Alan L., and Rhode, Paul W. (2004b) “The ‘Tuberculous Cattle Trust’: Disease contagion in an era of regulatory uncertainty.” Journal of Economic History 64: 929–63.Google Scholar
Pegram, Thomas R. (1991) “Public health and progressive dairying in Illinois.” Agricultural History 65: 3650.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (2000) “Not just what, but when: Timing and sequence in political processes.” Studies in American Political Development 14: 7292.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric (2001) Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waserman, Manfred J. (1972) “Henry L. Coit and the certified milk movement in the development of modern pediatrics.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 46: 359–90.Google Scholar
Whitaker, George M. (1911) The Milk Supply of Chicago and Washington, DC. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Animal Industry.Google Scholar
Wolf, Jacqueline (1998) “Discarding nature’s plan: A social history of infant feeding in Chicago, 1892-1938.” PhD diss., University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar