Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Abstract Construal Level and its Link to Self-Control and to Cross-Situational Consistency in Self-Concept: Predicting Health-Risk Behavioral Intentions

  • Itziar Fernández (a1), Amparo Caballero (a2), Dolores Muñoz (a2), Pilar Aguilar (a3) and Pilar Carrera (a2)...

Abstract

From a dispositional perspective, we extend the action identification theory (Vallacher & Wegner, 1987) and construal level theory (Trope & Liberman, 2003) to cross-situational consistency of self and self-control. Two studies examined the relationships among the abstract mindset (Vallacher & Wegner, 1989), cross-situational consistency in self-concept (Vignoles et al., 2016), and self-control (Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone 2004). In Study 1, participants (N = 725) characterized by high cross-situational consistency showed more abstraction in their thinking (p < .001, ηp2 = .17). In Study 2 (N = 244) cross-situational consistency and self-control explained 10% of construal level, with self-control being a significant predictor (p < .001). Construal level and cross-situational consistency explained 17% of self-control; both were significant predictors (p < .001). Self-control explained 8% of cross-situational consistency (p < .001). Study 2 showed that participants with higher levels of abstraction, cross-situational consistency, and self-control reported a greater intention to control their future sugar intake (p < .001). Data supported relationships among abstract construal level, cross-situational consistency and self-control.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Amparo Caballero, Departamento de Psicología Social y de Metodología de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Calle Iván Pavlov, 6. 28049 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: amparo.caballero@uam.es

Footnotes

Hide All

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, PSI 2014–53321–P

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Carrera, P., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., & Muñoz, D. (2017). Abstractness leads people to base their behavioral intentions on desired attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 2733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.004
Carrera, P., Caballero, A., Muñoz, D., González-Iraizoz, M., & Fernández, I. (2014). Construal level as a moderator of the role of affective and cognitive attitudes in the prediction of health risk behavioural intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 773791, https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12058
Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., & Albarracín, D. (2012). The present projects past behavior into the future while the past projects attitudes into the future: How verb tense moderates predictors of drinking intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 11961200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.001
Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Gercek-Swing, B. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310373752
Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 3543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023
Fernández, I., Carrera, P., Páez, D., & Sánchez, F. (2008). Interdependent self-construal, competitive attitudes, culture and emotional reactions on sadness. Psychologia, 51, 214234. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2008.214
Fernández, I., Carrera, P., Páez, D., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Campos, M., & Basabe, N. (2014). Prototypical anger components: A multilevel study. Cross-Cultural Research, 48, 400424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397114523932
Fernández, I., Páez, D., & González, J. L. (2005). Independent and interdependent self-construals and socio-cultural factors in 29 nations. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale. International Review of Social Psychology, 18, 3563.
Freitas, A. L., Salovey, P., & Liberman, N. (2001). Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 410412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.410
Fujita, K. (2008). Seeing the forest beyond the trees: A construal level approach to self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 14751496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00118.x
Fujita, K., & Carnevale, J. J. (2012). Transcending temptation through abstraction: The role of construal level in self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 248252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412449169
Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 562572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005
Fujita, K., & Han, H. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses: The effect of construal levels on evaluative associations in self-control conflicts. Psychological Science, 20, 799804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02372.x
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 351367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal distance on level of construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
Magen, E., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Harnessing the need for immediate gratification: Cognitive reconstrual moderates the reward value of temptations. Emotion, 7, 415428. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.415
Maloney, P. W., Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2012). The multi-factor structure of the Brief Self-Control scale: Discriminant validity of restraint and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 111115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.10.001
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.485
Owe, E., Vignoles, V. L., Becker, M., Brown, R., Smith, P. B., Lee, S. W. S.Jalal, B. (2014, July). Deconstructing “independence vs. interdependence”: A multidimensional approach to cultural models of selfhood. Paper presented at the 17th EASP General Meeting. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you are in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
Spassova, G., & Lee, A. Y. (2013). Looking into the future: A match between self-view and temporal distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 159171. https://doi.org/10.1086/669145
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.3
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
van Boven, L., Kamada, A., & Gilovich, T. (1999). The perceiver as perceived: Everyday intuitions about the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 11881199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1188
Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., … Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the “East-West” dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 9661000. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000175
Watkins, E., Moberly, N. J., & Moulds, M. L. (2008). Processing mode causally influences emotional reactivity: Distinct effects of abstract versus concrete construal on emotion response. Emotion, 8, 364378. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.364
Wegner, D. M., Vallacher, R. R., Kiersted, G. W., & Dizadji, D. M. (1986). Action identification in the emergence of social behavior. Social Cognition, 4, 1838. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.1.18
Weisz, J. R., Rothbaum, F. M., & Blackburn, T. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in American and Japan. American Psychologist, 39, 955969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.955
White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It´s the mindset that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 472485. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.472

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed