Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults

  • Virginia Sánchez (a1), Noelia Muñoz-Fernández (a1) and Rosario Ortega-Ruiz (a2)

Recent studies suggest that the online and offline behaviors young people display in romantic relationships are closely related. However, the differential effects of the dimensions of couple quality in the online context have not yet been explored in depth. The aim of this study was to explore online couple quality in young-adult relationships, and its association with romantic relationship satisfaction, also looking at effects of gender, age, and length of the relationship. 431 university students currently in a romantic relationship (68.2% females; mean age = 21.57) participated in this study. They completed different self-report measures to tap the online quality of their romantic relationships (online intimacy, control, jealousy, intrusiveness, cyberdating practices, and communication strategies) and level of satisfaction with those relationships. Results showed that participants more often reported online intimacy (M men = 2.49; M women = 2.38) than the negative scales of online quality (mean ranged from .43 to 1.50), and all the online quality scales decreased with age (correlations ranged from –.12 to –.30) and relationship length (correlations ranged from –.02 to –.20). Linear regression analyses indicated that online intimacy (b = .32, p = .001) and intrusiveness (b = .11, p = .035) were positively related to relationship satisfaction, while cyberdating practices (b = –.20, p = .001) and communication strategies (b = –.34, p = .001) were negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction. Moreover, gender and relationship length moderated some of these associations. Results indicate that while online quality and relationship satisfaction are related, the impact of different online quality dimensions on relationship satisfaction differs depending on a participant’s sex, age, and relationship length.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Virginia Sánchez Jiménez. Departmento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Universidad de Sevilla. C/ Camilo José Cela, s/n. 41018. Seville (Spain). Phone: +34–954557650. Fax: +34–954557650. E-mail:
Hide All
Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 11811190.
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships II: A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217233.
Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 95113.
Carpenter, C. J., & Spottswood, E. L. (2013). Exploring romantic relationships on social networking sites using the self-expansion model. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 15311537.
Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873893.
Clayton, R. B. (2014). The third wheel: The impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 425430.
Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 717720.
Connolly, J., Craig, W., Goldberg, A., & Pepler, D. (2004). Mixedgender groups, dating, and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 185207.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Zuniga, De, , H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247253.
Cravens, J. D., Leckie, K. R., & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Facebook infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(1), 7490.
Dhariwal, A., Connolly, J., Paciello, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Adolescent peer relationships and emerging adult romantic styles: A longitudinal study of youth in an Italian community. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 579600.
Durán-Segura, M., & Martínez-Pecino, R. (2015). Ciberacoso mediante teléfono móvil e Internet en las relaciones de noviazgo entre jóvenes [Cyberharassment via cell phone and Internet in youth dating relationships]. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 22, 159167.
Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631635.
Espinoza, A. V., Correa, F. E., & García, L. F. (2014). Percepción social de la infidelidad y estilos de amor en la pareja [Social perception of infidelity and love styles in relationships]. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 19(1), 135147.
Ferrer, V., Bosch, E., Ramis, M. C., & Navarro, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos [Beliefs and attitudes about intimate partner violence against women: Sociodemographic, family, and educational determinants]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 251259.
Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2013). Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: An exploratory study of emerging adults’ perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 37.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63(1), 103115.
Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 207230.
Hurley, L., & Reese-Weber, M. (2012). Conflict strategies and intimacy: Variations by romantic relationship development and gender. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6, 200210.
Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). Intrusiveness from an attachment theory perspective: A dyadic diary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 972977.
Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2009). Intrusiveness in romantic relationships: A cross-cultural perspective on imbalances between proximity and autonomy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 9891008.
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the Internet, and social media: How American couples use digital technology to manage life, logistics, and emotional intimacy within their relationships. New York, NY: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
Madsen, S. D., & Collins, W. A. (2011). The salience of adolescent romantic experiences for romantic relationship qualities in young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 789801.
Morey, J. N., Gentzler, A. L., Creasy, B., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 17711778.
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 3550.
Rahaman, H. M. S. (2015). Romantic relationship length and its perceived quality: Mediating role of Facebook-related conflict. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11, 395405.
Rauer, A. J., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49, 21592171.
Rohman, E., Führer, A., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2016). Relationship satisfaction across European cultures: The role of love styles. Cross-Cultural Research, 50, 178211.
Sánchez, V., Muñoz, N., Nocentini, A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Menesini, E. (2014). Online intrusiveness, online jealousy and dating aggression in young adults: A cross-national study (Spain-Italy). Maltrattamento e Abuso all’Infanzia, 3, 4765.
Sánchez, V., Muñoz-Fernández, N., & Ortega-Ruíz, R. (2015). “Cyberdating Q_A”: An instrument to assess the quality of adolescent dating relationships in social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 7886.
Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 2739.
Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4(1), 7192.
Stewart, M. C., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27(1), 1326.
Strawhun, J., Adams, N., & Huss, M. T. (2013). The assessment of cyberstalking: An expanded examination including social networking, attachment, jealousy, and anger in relation to violence and abuse. Violence and Victims, 28, 715730.
Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital youth. New York, NY: Springer.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705713.
Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 511527.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Spanish Journal of Psychology
  • ISSN: 1138-7416
  • EISSN: 1988-2904
  • URL: /core/journals/spanish-journal-of-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed